Therapeutic Jurisprudence Reading Answers

Apr 25, 2025

Therapeutic Jurisprudence Reading Answers is an academic reading answers topic. Therapeutic Jurisprudence Reading Answers has a total of 13 IELTS questions in total. In the first question set given you have to fill the blanks with the correct answer only with one word. In the next question set given you have to fill the blanks with the correct option in no more than three words for each.In the last question set you have to state whether the statement is true, false or not given with reference to the passage given.

The IELTS Reading section is an essential part of the test that evaluates a candidate's comprehension and analysis of various passage types. You will work through a number of IELTS reading practice problems in this section that resemble actual test situations. These questions are designed to help you improve your ability to recognize essential concepts, extract particular facts, and make inferences. Practicing Therapeutic Jurisprudence IELTS reading problem can help you get comfortable with the structure and increase your confidence for the exam, regardless of whether you are studying for the Academic or General Training module.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1 Therapeutic Jurisprudence

An Overview

Therapeutic jurisprudence is the study of the role of the law as a therapeutic agent. It examines the law's impact on emotional life and on psychological well-being, and the therapeutic and anti therapeutic consequences of the law. It is most applicable to the fields of mental health law, criminal law, juvenile law and family law.

The general aim of therapeutic jurisprudence is the humanizing of the law and addressing the human, emotional and psychological side of the legal process. It promotes the perspective that the law is a social force that produces behaviours and consequences. Therapeutic jurisprudence strives to have laws made or applied in a more therapeutic way as long as other values, such as justice and due process, can be fully respected. It is important to recognise that therapeutic jurisprudence does not itself suggest that therapeutic goals should trump other goals. It does not support paternalism or coercion by any means. It is simply a way of looking at the law in a richer way and then bringing to the table some areas and issues that previously have gone unnoticed. Therapeutic jurisprudence simply suggests that we think about the therapeutic consequences of law and see if they can be factored into the processes of law-making, lawyering, and judging.

The law can be divided into the following categories: (1) legal rules, (2) legal procedures, such as hearings and trials and (3) the roles of legal actors — the behaviour of judges, lawyers, and of therapists acting in a legal context. Much of what legal actors do has an impact on the psychological well-being or emotional life of persons affected by the law, for example, in the dialogues that judges have with defendants or that lawyers have with clients. Therefore, therapeutic jurisprudence is especially applicable to this third category.

Therapeutic jurisprudence is a relatively new phenomenon. In the early days of the law, attitudes were very different and efforts were focused primarily on what was wrong with various sorts of testimony. While there were good reasons for that early emphasis, an exclusive focus on what is wrong, rather than also looking at what is right and how these aspects could be further developed, is seriously shortsighted. Therapeutic jurisprudence focuses attention on this previously under-appreciated aspect, encouraging us to look very hard for promising development and to borrow from the behavioural science literature, even when this literature has nothing obviously to do with the law. It encourages people to think creatively about how promising developments from other fields might be brought into the legal system.

Recently, as a result of this multidisciplinary approach, certain kinds of rehabilitative programmes have begun to emerge that looks rather promising. One type of cognitive behavioural treatment encourages offenders to prepare relapse prevention plans which require them to think through the chain of events that lead to criminality. These reasoning and rehabilitation-type programmes teach offenders cognitive self-change, to stop and think and figure out consequences, to anticipate high-risk situations, and to learn to avoid or cope with them. These programmes, so far, seem to be reasonably successful.

From a therapeutic jurisprudence standpoint, the question is how these programmes might be brought into the law. In one obvious sense, these problem-solving, reasoning and rehabilitation-type programmes can be made widely available in correctional and community settings. A way of linking them even more to the law, of course, would be to make them part of the legal process itself. The suggestion here is that if a judge or parole board becomes familiar with these techniques and is about to consider someone for probation, the judge might say. 'I'm going to consider you but I want you to come up with a preliminary relapse prevention plan that we will use as a basis for discussion. I want you to figure out why I should grant you probation and why I should be comfortable that you're going to succeed. In order for me to feel comfortable, I need to know what you regard to be high-risk situations and how you're going to avoid them or cope with them.

If that approach is followed, courts will be promoting cognitive self-change as part and parcel of the sentencing process itself. The process may operate this way; an offender would make a statement like 'I realise I mess up on Friday nights; therefore, I propose that I will stay at home on Friday nights. ' Suddenly, it is not a judge imposing something on the offender. It's something that the offender has come up with him or herself, so he or she should think it is fair. If a person has a voice in his rehabilitation, then he is more likely to feel a commitment to it, and with that commitment, presumably, compliance will increase dramatically.

Questions 14-20

Choose NO MORE THAN ONE WORD for each answer.

NOTES: Therapeutic Jurisprudence

Therapeutic Jurisprudence:

study of the law as a therapeutic (14)........and the therapeutic and(15).......consequences of the law.

(14)........

Answer: AGENT

Supporting statement: Therapeutic jurisprudence is the study of the role of the law as a therapeutic agent.

Keywords: law, agent

Keyword Location: Para 1, Line 1

Explanation: According to the text, therapeutic jurisprudence is the study of the role of the law as a therapeutic agent. In thi,s the law is studied by keeping in mind the impact they have on the emotional and psychological well-being of a person with respect to the law.

(15)........

Answer: ANTI THERAPEUTIC

Supporting statement: and the therapeutic and anti therapeutic consequences of the law.

Keywords: therapeutic, anti

Keyword Location: Para 1, Lines 2-3

Explanation: According to the passage, therapeutic jurisprudence is the study done by a therapeutic agent to study therapeutic and antitherapeutic consequences of the law.

Goal:

the (16)...............of the law, but not at the expense of (17)................and due process.

(16)........

Answer: HUMANISING

Supporting statement:The general aim of therapeutic jurisprudence is the humanizing of the law

Keywords: general aim, humanizing

Keyword Location: Para 2, Line 1

Explanation: According to the text humanising the law and addressing the emotional, psychological, and human aspects of the legal process are the main goals of therapeutic jurisprudence.

(17)........

Answer: JUSTICE

Supporting statement: therapeutic way as long as other values, such as justice and due process,

Keywords: justice, process

Keyword Location: Para 2, Line 5

Explanation: The text states that as long as other ideals, including justice and due process, can be properly upheld, therapeutic jurisprudence aims to have laws established or applied in a more therapeutic manner.

Applicable to:

especially applicable to the role of legal (18).................such as judges and lawyers

Answer: ACTORS

Supporting statement:Therefore, therapeutic jurisprudence is especially applicable to this third category.

Keywords: applicable, third category

Keyword Location: Para 3, Line 6

Explanation: According to the text the Law is divided into three categories, one of them being the duties of legal actors, as well as the behaviour of judges, lawyers, and therapists working in the field of law. A lot of decisions taken by legal actors have an effect on the emotional or psychological health of those who are impacted by the law. For this reason, therapeutic jurisprudence is particularly important to this category.

Therapeutic jurisprudence = new attitude

1. It asks people to seek out(19)................developments, not problems.

Answer: PROMISING

Supporting statement :encouraging us to look very hard for promising development and to borrow from the behavioural science literature,

Keywords: promising, behavioural

Keyword Location: Para 4, Lines 6-7

Explanation: According to the text ,Therapeutic jurisprudence is a relatively new phenomenon as it encourages people to look at the promising development it offers instead of looking at the wrong aspects of the offered testimony with no importance about the right.

2. It urges people to think(20)................and borrow from other fields.

Answer: CREATIVELY

Supporting statement:It encourages people to think creatively about how promising developments

Keywords: encourages, creatively

Keyword Location: Para 4, Line 8

Explanation: The text states that Therapeutic jurisprudence encourages people to look at the development it offers and think of a creative way to include other fields that can be included in the legal system.

Questions 21-23

Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS for each answer.

21. One aspect of cognitive behavioural treatment includes the preparation of……………By offenders.

Answer: RELAPSE PREVENTION PLANS

Supporting statement:One type of cognitive behavioural treatment encourages offenders to prepare relapse prevention plans

Keywords: cognitive, offenders

Keyword Location: Para 5, Lines 2-3

Explanation: Therapeutic jurisprudence encourages to inclusion of other fields in the law has resulted in the start of a multidisciplinary approach and certain kinds of rehabilitative programs, which look rather promising, as one of their approaches includes cognitive behavioural treatment, which encourages the offenders to prepare a relapse prevention plan.

22. The treatment requires offenders to consider the……………… that lead to a crime being committed.

Answer: CHAIN of EVENTS

Supporting statement: relapse prevention plans which require them to think through the chain of events that lead to criminality.

Keywords: plans, criminality

Keyword Location: Para 5, Lines 3-4

Explanation: According to the text the cognitive behavioural treatment which encourages the offenders to prepare a relapse prevention plan allows them to think about the chain of events that led them to commit the crime in the first place.

23. Treatment programmes encourage offenders to before they happen, and know recognise……………… what to do in case they do happen.

Answer: HIGH- RISKS SITUATIONS

Supporting statement: I need to know what you regard to be high-risk situations and how you're going to avoid them or cope with them.

Keywords: high-risk, cope

Keyword Location: Para 6, Lines 10-11

Explanation: According to the text relapse prevention plan will make the offenders more aware about themselves and it will offer them an insight on the high risk situations which usually leads them to commit a crime or offence. Through this treatment, a judge might encourage the offender to come up with a suitable course of prevention they can follow in case a similar situation arises in the future.

Questions 24-26

Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 2?

TRUE - if the statement agrees with the information

FALSE - if the statement contradicts the information

NOT GIVEN - if there is no information on this

24. The use of rehabilitative programmes has been proved to greatly reduce the chance of a criminal re-offending.

Answer: NOT GIVEN

Explanation: The text contains no information regarding the use of rehabilitative programs as a way to prove the chances of criminal re- offending.

25. Therapeutic jurisprudence aims to make cognitive behavioural treatment a part of the legal process itself

Answer: TRUE

Supporting statement:A way of linking them even more to the law, of course, would be to make them part of the legal process itself.

Keywords: linking, legal process

Keyword Location: Para 6, Lines 4-5

Explanation: According to the tex,t the aim of therapeutic jurisprudence is to make a link between cognitive behavioural treatment and the laws itself by making it a part of the legal process itself.

26. offenders might be encouraged by judges to take part in deciding what their punishment should be.

Answer: FALSE

Supporting statement:the judge might say. 'I'm going to consider you but I want you to come up with a preliminary relapse prevention plan that we will use as a basis for discussion.

Keywords: judge. prevention

Keyword Location: Para 6, Lines 6-7

Explanation: According to the text, the judges in case will ask the offenders to come up with suitable punishment that they will get instea,d they will ask them to prepare a prevention plan so they can overcome the same situation if encountered in the future to avoid a re-offense.

Read More IELTS Reading Related Samples