Psychological Strategies for Meaningful Conversations Reading Answers

Feb 11, 2025

Psychological Strategies for Meaningful Conversations Reading Answers is an academic topic for IELTS Reading Answers. Psychological Strategies for Meaningful Conversations Reading Answers, in total, consist of 14 IELTS questions. In the given set of questions (Questions No. 27-31), the candidate has to match each statement with the correct researcher. After that, from Questions No. 32-36, you have to fill in the blanks with the correct word (the answer should be in One Word only). Finally, choose the correct option from the given list of options on the remaining questions (Questions No. 37-40).

The IELTS Reading Answers section evaluates a candidate’s ability to understand and analyze academic and general texts. Practicing with IELTS Reading Practice Papers helps familiarize you with question types, and enhance your vocabulary and critical reading skills. Following all the exam instructions carefully and managing time effectively are some primary strategies to obtain a high band score in the IELTS Exam.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching — Join for a Free Trial Class Now

Section 1 Psychological Strategies for Meaningful Conversations Reading Answers

In the realm of human interaction, conversations possess tremendous influence, serving as a means to establish new connections and enrich existing relationships. However, not all conversations unfold smoothly, some result in conflict, harm, or resentment, while others never take off due to the fear of discomfort or rejection. The intricate nature of conversations has remained a puzzle for psychologists. According to Thalia Wheatley, PhD, a professor of psychological and brain sciences at Dartmouth College, dialogue serves as an age-old mechanism for synchronizing our minds, and facilitating a shared understanding. “It's the most ubiquitous social behavior that we do, yet we don't know much about it.” In recent years, new ideas and tools have emerged, offering insights into important social interactions, from everyday conversations to political debates and negotiations. Psychologists are using advanced methods like natural language processing and hyperscanning (scanning multiple brains at once) to gain fresh perspectives. Moreover, these findings are being shared to deepen day-to-day interactions among strangers, foster more constructive disagreements, and enhance results for professionals such as mediators and suicide crisis negotiators.

Michael Kardas, PhD, an assistant professor of management at Oklahoma State University's Spears School of Business, reported: “People's well-being is determined in large part by the quality of their social relationships, which rely heavily on conversations that they have with each other.” He believed that taking conversations to a slightly deeper level and acquiring the ability to navigate through disagreements can foster connections that contribute to heightened feelings of happiness. Kardas believed conversations, being the main form of social interaction, are crucial for our well-being. Yet, we often shy away from some of the most satisfying interactions, including deep conversations and the prospect of forming new connections with strangers.

Psychologist Juliana Schroeder, PhD, an associate professor at the University of California, Berkeley's Haas School of Business, pointed out that a contributing factor is people's inaccurate prediction that conversations will become less interesting over time. In an experiment on communication among strangers, Kardas and his team found that people frequently think of conversations as other enjoyable activities. Just as the fifth chocolate bar might not be as enjoyable as the first, there's a belief that conversation quality declines over time. Even after a positive conversation, participants preferred moments of silence in a 30-minute session rather than continuing to talk to a stranger, if given the choice. Interestingly, those randomly assigned to a 30-minute conversation reported a more positive overall experience than those who chose to end their conversations early. “People are ending conversations earlier than they might otherwise do because they expect enjoyment will go down and that they'll run out of things to say,” Schroeder explained. People tend to think that profound conversations, especially with strangers, will be more uncomfortable than they turn out to be. In an experiment, Kardas and his team paired individuals with strangers to discuss either light topics (e.g… How often do you come here?) or deep ones (e.g… Can you describe the last time you cried in front of another person?). Surveys conducted before and after the discussions revealed that deep conversations were less awkward and resulted in more connection and happiness than participants had expected.

To facilitate meaningful interactions, researchers propose certain strategies for holding effective conversations. Research conducted by social psychologist Julia Minson, PhD, an associate professor of public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, and their colleagues reveals that the quality of conversation improves when individuals use follow-up questions. In speed dating scenarios, those who asked more follow-up questions were more successful in getting a second date. “Questions make you more likable, but the key is showing that you're listening.” Addressing 34. Minson added. Another technique to minimize gaps in conversations is effective listening, according to research by Wheatley, her postdoctoral fellow Emma Templeton, PhD, and their research team. They showed that in interactions between friends and strangers, short pauses create an enhanced feeling of connection. Successful conversations not only bring about connection and happiness, but also effectively navigate disagreements, turning them into positive outcomes.

“Disagreement is inevitable, and our success or failure in relationships is often based on whether we can navigate that successfully, and build trust despite it,” Michael Yeomans, PhD, an assistant professor of strategy and organizational behavior at Imperial College London stated. Minson and her colleagues are researching a concept they call “conversational receptiveness” They explore ways to demonstrate openness to opposing views in discussions. Using a natural language processing algorithm, the researchers analyze words and phrases that indicate receptiveness in a listener, summarizing their findings with the acronym HEAR-hedging, emphasizing agreement, acknowledging, and reframing. Hedging statements means introducing some uncertainty to prevent your conversation partner from displaying reactions automatically. Emphasizing agreement about finding common ground. Acknowledgment means restating the other person's position to show you heard and understood them. Lastly, reframing involves using positive words and avoiding negative ones.

Section 2

Solutions and Explanations

Questions 27-31

Match each statement with the correct researcher, A-D. Write the correct letter A-D.

NB, YOU MAY USE ANY LETTER MORE THAN ONCE.

LIST OF RESEARCHERS

A. Thalia Wheatley

B. Juliana Schroeder

C. Julia Minson

D. Michael Yeomans

27. The critical aspect of posing questions is to demonstrate your engagement in conversation.

Answer: C (Julia Minson)

Supporting statement: “.........Questions make you more likable, but the key is showing that you're listening. Addressing 34. Minson added.........”

Keywords: Questions, Minson, Critical, Engagement

Keyword Location: para 4, Line 7-8

Explanation: Julia Minson emphasizes that asking follow-up questions improves the quality of conversations, making individuals more likable by actively listening and showing engagement.

28. Predicting a decline in enjoyment and running out of ideas, people often cut conversations short.

Answer: B (Juliana Schroeder)

Supporting statement: “.........People are ending conversations earlier than they might otherwise do because they expect enjoyment will go down and that they'll run out of things to say,” Schroeder explained..........”

Keywords: Schroeder, Enjoyment, Conversations, Ending

Keyword Location: para 3, Line 12-14

Explanation: Schroeder observed that people incorrectly assume that conversations will become less interesting over time, frequently ending them early out of fear of running out of ideas.

29. Asking more relevant questions will enhance the dialogue.

Answer: C (Julia Minson)

Supporting statement: “.........Research conducted by social psychologist Julia Minson, PhD, an associate professor of public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, and their colleagues reveals that the quality of conversation improves when individuals use follow-up questions.........”

Keywords: Research, Psychologist, Professor, Colleagues

Keyword Location: para 4, Line 2-5

Explanation: Julia Minson emphasizes that asking follow-up questions improves the quality of conversations and makes individuals more likable, as shown in speed dating experiments, where more questions lead to better results.

30. Conflicts should be handled well to build trust in a relationship.

Answer: D (Michael Yeomans)

Supporting statement: “.........Disagreement is inevitable, and our success or failure in relationships is often based on whether we can navigate that successfully, and build trust despite it,” Michael Yeomans, PhD, an assistant professor of strategy and organizational behavior at Imperial College London stated..........”

Keywords: Disagreement, Success, Failure, Relationships

Keyword Location: para 5, Line 1-4

Explanation: Michael Yeomans emphasizes that success in relationships depends on resolving disagreements respectfully and building trust despite conflicts.

31. There is little understanding of conversation despite its prevalence.

Answer: A (Thalia Wheatley)

Supporting statement: “........“It's the most ubiquitous social behavior that we do, yet we don't know much about it.” In recent years, new ideas and tools have emerged, offering insights into important social interactions, from everyday conversations to political debates and negotiations...........”

Keywords: Conversations, Behavior, Ideas, Interactions

Keyword Location: para 1, Line 9-12

Explanation: Wheatley noted that interactions are a fundamental social behavior, yet there is limited understanding of how they work.

Questions 32-36

Choose ONE WORD ONLY.

STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTIVE CONVERSATIONS

Harvard researchers discovered that incorporating follow-up questions enhances communication ____32____.

Answer: Quality

Supporting statement: “........Research conducted by social psychologist Julia Minson, PhD, an associate professor of public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, and their colleagues reveals that the quality of conversation improves when individuals use follow-up questions............”

Keywords: Harvard, Follow-up, Questions, Research

Keyword Location: para 4, Line 2-5

Explanation: The term “quality” is appropriate because follow-up questions have been described as improving the quality of conversation by making participants appear more likable and attentive.

Another method is through effective listening, which fosters a deeper ___33____ by the use of short pauses.

Answer: Connection

Supporting statement: “........They showed that in interactions between friends and strangers, short pauses create an enhanced feeling of connection.............”

Keywords: Connection, Interactions, Friends, Strangers

Keyword Location: para 4, Line 10-12

Explanation: As research by Wheatley and her team has shown, effective listening using short pauses promotes a deeper connection, which increases feelings of connectedness in both friends and strangers.

Addressing ____34_____ is equally crucial. Minson and her team are delving into the concept of “conversational receptiveness,” summarized with the acronym HEAR:

Answer: Disagreement

Supporting statement: “........“Disagreement is inevitable, and our success or failure in relationships is often based on whether we can navigate that successfully, and build trust despite it,” Michael Yeomans, PhD, an assistant professor of strategy and organizational behavior at Imperial College London stated..............”

Keywords: Disagreement, Strategy, Organizational

Keyword Location: para 5, Line 1-4

Explanation: Minson and his team emphasize the importance of resolving disagreements in conversation to build trust and maintain positive relationships.

Hedging (H): Introduces uncertainty to prevent immediate_____35____.

Answer: Reactions

Supporting statement: “.........Hedging statements means introducing some uncertainty to prevent your conversation partner from displaying reactions automatically............”

Keywords: Hedging, Uncertainty, Prevent, Introducing

Keyword Location: para 5, Line 9-11

Explanation: Hedging introduces uncertainty to prevent the conversation partner's immediate reactions, allowing for a more thoughtful exchange.

Emphasizing (E): Agreement finds common ground.

Acknowledgment (A): Restates the partner's position.

Reframing (R): Properly uses 36. ________.

Answer: Words

Supporting statement: “.........Acknowledgment means restating the other person's position to show you heard and understood them. Lastly, reframing involves using positive words and avoiding negative ones............”

Keywords: Words, Positive, Negative, Position

Keyword Location: para 5, Line 12-14

Explanation: The passage explains reframing as “using positive words and avoiding negative ones,” thus the missing word is “words.”

Questions 37-40

Choose the correct letter.

37. In the first paragraph, what information about conversations does the writer mention?

A. Psychologists have not made enough effort to discover the complicated nature of conversations.

B. The major reason for ineffective conversations is the fear of discomfort or rejection.

C. Conversations serve as effective means to handle conflicts.

D. Psychologists still have not fully understood the complex characteristics of communication

Answer: D (Psychologists still have not fully understood the complex characteristics of communication)

Supporting statement: “.........“It's the most ubiquitous social behavior that we do, yet we don't know much about it.” In recent years, new ideas and tools have emerged, offering insights into important social interactions, from everyday conversations to political debates and negotiations.............”

Keywords: Social, Interactions, Debates, Negotiations

Keyword Location: para 1, Line 9-12

Explanation: The author says that psychologists are still discovering the nature of the interaction, highlighting it as “an age-old mechanism” that is not fully understood.

38. Which information is mentioned by Michael Kardas about deep conversations?

A. There is a common reluctance to have in-depth discussions.

B. Conversations have consistently served as the main form of social interaction.

C. Deep conversations help people handle disagreements better.

D. Quality conversations are the most effective way to enhance people's well-being.

Answer: A (There is a common reluctance to have in-depth discussions)

Supporting statement: “.........Yet, we often shy away from some of the most satisfying interactions, including deep conversations and the prospect of forming new connections with strangers.............”

Keywords: Shy, Interactions, Connections, Prospect

Keyword Location: para 2, Line 8-10

Explanation: Michael Kardas discusses people's tendency to shy away from deep conversations, despite their potential benefits, due to the discomfort or fear of rejection.

39. What information did Kardas and his team mention regarding the experiment on communication among strangers?

A. Time is believed to be the major factor in quality conversation.

B. Conversations are considered favorite activities.

C. A higher sense of positivity was reported among participants assigned to a brief conversation.

D. After a positive experience, participants in their study chose to maintain the conversation with a stranger.

Answer: D (After a positive experience, participants in their study chose to maintain the conversation with a stranger.)

Supporting statement: “.........Interestingly, those randomly assigned to a 30-minute conversation reported a more positive overall experience than those who decided to end their conversations early. ...........”

Keywords: Positive, Experience, Conversation, Decided

Keyword Location: para 3, Line 10-12

Explanation: Participants assigned to a 30-minute conversation reported a more positive experience than those who chose to end early.

40. What information is mentioned about Kardas's survey on deep conversations?

A. Contrary to expectations, less discomfort and more connection and happiness were gained from deep conversations.

B. Participants were paired with strangers to discuss daily topics more deeply.

C. People tend to think that profound conversations, especially with strangers, are more uncomfortable than they turn out

D. Thorough surveys were conducted at the stage of the discussions.

Answer: A (Contrary to expectations, less discomfort and more connection and happiness were gained from deep conversations.)

Supporting statement: “........Surveys conducted before and after the discussions revealed that deep conversations were less awkward and resulted in more connection and happiness than participants had expected............”

Keywords: Surveys, Connection, Deep Conversations

Keyword Location: para 3, Line 19-21

Explanation: The survey revealed that deeper conversations led to greater engagement and happiness for participants than expected.

Read More IELTS Reading Related Samples