Forgetting Reading Answers

Feb 26, 2025

Forgetting Reading Answers is an academic reading answers topic. Forgetting Reading Answers has a total of 14 IELTS questions in total. In the first question set you have to complete the summary by writing the correct answer. In the next question set you have to state whether the statement is given in the passage. In the last question set you have to answer in no more than three words.

The IELTS Reading section is an essential part of the test that evaluates a candidate's comprehension and analysis of various passage types. You will work through a number of IELTS reading practice problems in this section that resemble actual test situations. These questions are designed to help you improve your ability to recognize essential concepts, extract particular facts, and make inferences. Practicing these IELTS reading problems can help you get comfortable with the structure and increase your confidence for the exam, regardless of whether you are studying for the Academic or General Training module.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1 Forgetting

When a memory of a past experience is not activated for days or months, forgetting tends to occur. Yet it is erroneous to think that memories simply fade over time—the steps Involved are far more complex. In seeking to understand forgetting In the context of memory, such auxiliary phenomena as differences in the rates of forgetting for different kinds of information also must be taken into account.

It has been suggested that, as time passes, the physiological bases of memory tend to change. With disuse, according to this view, the neural engram (the memory trace in the brain) gradually decays or loses its clarity. While such a theory seems reasonable, it would, if left at this point, do little more than restate behavioral evidence of forgetting at the nervous-system level. Decay or deterioration does not seem attributable merely to the passage of time; some underlying physical process needs to be demonstrated. Until a neurochemical basis for memory can be more explicitly described, any decay theory of forgetting must await detailed development.

A prominent theory of forgetting at the behavioral level is anchored in the phenomenon of interference, or inhibition, which can be either retroactive or proactive. In retroactive inhibition, new learning interferes with the retention of old memories; in proactive inhibition, old memories interfere with the retention of new learning. Both phenomena have great implications for all kinds of human learning.

In a typical study of interference, subjects are asked to learn two successive verbal lists. The following day some are asked to recall the first list and others to recall the second. A third group learns only one list and is asked to recall it a day later. People who learn two lists nearly always recall fewer words than those in the other group. Theorists attribute the loss produced by these procedures to interference between list-learning tasks. When lists are constructed to exhibit varying differences, the degree of interference seems to be related to the amount of similarity. Thus, loss in recall will be reduced when two successive lists have no identical terms. Maximum loss generally will occur when there appears to be heavy (but not complete) overlap in the memory attributes for the two lists. One may recall parts of the first list in trying to remember the second and vice versa. (This breakdown in discrimination may reflect the presence of dominant attributes that are appropriate for items in both lists.) Discrimination tends to deteriorate as

the number of lists increases, retroactive and proactive inhibition increasing correspondingly, suggesting interference at the time of recall.

In retroactive inhibition, however, not all of the loss need be attributed to competition at the moment of recall. Some of the first list may be lost to memory in learning the second; this is called unlearning. If one is asked to recall from both lists combined, first-list items are less likely to be remembered than if the second list had not been learned. Learning the second list seems to act backward in time (retroactively) to destroy some memory of the first. Much effort has been devoted to studying the conditions that affect unlearning, which has become a major topic in interference theory.

Retroactive and proactive effects can be quite gross quantitatively. If one learns a list one day and tries to recall it the next, learns a second list and attempts recall for it the following day, learns a third, and so on, recall for each successive list tends to decline. Roughly 80 percent recall may be anticipated for the first list: this declines steeply to about 20 percent for the 10th list. Learning the earlier lists seems to act forward in time (proactively) to inhibit retention of later lists. These proactive phenomena indicate that the more one learns, the more rapidly one forgets. Similar effects can be demonstrated for retroactive inhibition within Just one laboratory session.

Such powerful effects have led some researchers to speculate that all forgetting is produced by interference. Any given memory is said to be subject to Interference from others established earlier or subsequently. Interference, theoretically, may occur When memories conflict through any attributes. With a limited group of attributes and an enormous number of memories, it might seem that ordinary attempts at recall would be chaotic. Yet, even if all of the memories shared some information, other attributes not held in common could still serve to distinguish them. For example, every memory theoretically is encoded at a different time, and temporal attributes might serve to discriminate otherwise conflicting memories. Indeed, when two apparently conflicting lists are learned several days apart, proactive inhibition is markedly reduced. Assuming that memories are multiply encoded, interference theory need not predict utter confusion in remembering.

Sources of interference are quite pervasive and should not be considered narrowly. For example, all memories seem to be established in specific surroundings or contexts. and subsequent efforts to remember tend to be less effective when the circumstances differ from the original. Alcoholics, when sober, tend to have trouble finding bottles they have hidden while intoxicated; when they drink again, the task is much easier. Some contexts aIso may be associated with other memories that interfere with whatever it is that one is trying to remember.

Questions 27 — 31

Complete the summary using the list of words

and phrases, A-J, below.

People tend to forget their past experiences if they do not think of those experiences often.

27.In fact, the forgetting process is, however, much more 27…………. than that.

Answer: H

Supporting statement:the steps Involved are far more complex.

Keywords: steps, complex

Keyword Location: Para 1, Lines 2-3

Explanation:Forgetting often happens when a recollection of a former event is not recalled for days or months. However, it is incorrect to believe that memories only deteriorate with time; there are many more complicated factors at work.

28.One theory suggests that the neural engram will decay if it is 28…...... for a long time, so we forget things.

Answer: D

Supporting statement:With disuse, according to this view, the neural engram (the memory trace in the brain) gradually

Keywords:neural engram, gradually

Keyword Location: Para 2, Line 2

Explanation:According to certain beliefs, the physiological foundations of memory tend to alter with time. According to this theory, the neural engram—the brain's memory trace—gradually deteriorates or becomes less clear with inactivity.

29.Another theory attributes the forgetting to the phenomenon of inhibition, in which our memory is 29……… by that established earlier or later,

Answer: C

Supporting statement:A prominent theory of forgetting at the behavioral level is anchored in the phenomenon of interference, or inhibition,

Keywords: theory, behavioral

Keyword Location: Para 3, Line 1

Explanation:The phenomena of interference, or inhibition, which can be either proactive or retroactive, is the foundation of a well-known behavioral theory of forgetfulness.

In terms of retroactive inhibition, old memory is forgotten to memorize new knowledge, but this is not 30………. to the conflicts taking place at the moment when we recall.

Answer: G

Supporting statement: In retroactive inhibition, however, not all of the loss need be attributed to competition at the moment of recall.

Keywords: retroactive, attributed

Keyword Location: Para 5, Line 1

Explanation: Retroactive inhibition is the process by which we forget previous information in order to memorize new information, however this is not explained by the conflicts that occur when we recollect

It is just when we learn something new. Regarding proactive inhibition, things are31………..

Answer: F

Supporting statement:These proactive phenomena indicate that the more one learns, the more rapidly one forgets.

Keywords: proactive phenomena, rapidly

Keyword Location: Para 6, Line 6

Explanation: In proactive inhibition when one learns something new they tend to forget things more quickly.

A. Simple

B. Lost

C. Interfered

D. Disused

E. Predictable

F. Contrary

G. Attributed

H. Complicated

Questions 32-37

Do the following statements agree with the

information given in the Reading Passage ?

YES If the statements agree with the claims

NO If the statements contradict with the claims

NOT GIVEN If it iS impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

32. In our brains, the memory trace deteriorates mainly when a long time has passed.

Answer: NO

Supporting statement:Decay or deterioration does not seem attributable merely to the passage of time

Keywords: Decay, time

Keyword Location: Para 2, Lines 4-5

Explanation: According to the text decay or deterioration of the memory does not happen only due to the passage of time.

33. When humans acquire new knowledge the existing one is negatively impacted as a result of a phenomenon called inhibition.

Answer: YES

Supporting statement:A prominent theory of forgetting at the behavioral level is anchored in the phenomenon of interference, or inhibition

Keywords: prominent, inhibition

Keyword Location: Para 3, Lines 1-2

Explanation: Forgetting the existing knowledge after acquiring new one is due to the phenomenon called inhibition.

34. In the study of interference, volunteers who learned one verbal list could remember more words than those asked to learn two lists.

Answer: YES

Supporting statement:In a typical study of interference, subjects are asked to learn two successive verbal lists.

Keywords: interference, lists

Keyword Location: Para 4, Lines 1-2

Explanation: In the study of interference subjects who learned two lists could only recall a few words in comparison to those who only were asked to learn only one list.

35. To minimize the number of words forgotten, more similar words should be added in the

list-learning task.

Answer: NO

Supporting statement:loss in recall will be reduced when two successive lists have no identical terms.

Keywords: reduced, lists

Keyword Location: Para 4, Line 7

Explanation: The subjects asked to learn the lists in the study of interference will have less words forgotten if both the lists have no similar words.

36. The more lists of words people learn within one day, the faster they can recall them.

Answer: NOT GIVEN

Explanation: No information is given in the passage about people being able to recall the words given in a list faster if they are given more than list in one day.

37. People can better remember past experiences when the contexts are slightly modified.

Answer: NO

Supporting statement:subsequent efforts to remember tend to be less effective when the circumstances differ from the original.

Keywords: remember, less effective

Keyword Location: Para 8, Line 3

Explanation: Any individual will not be able to remember a past experience properly if any of the context differs from the original.

Questions 38-40

Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS.

38. Apart from time, what else needs to be present to result in the deterioration of the neural engram?

Answer: UNDERLYING PHYSICAL PROCESS

Supporting statement:deterioration does not seem attributable merely to the passage of time; some underlying physical process

Keywords: passage, physical process

Keyword Location: Para 2, Lines 5-6

Explanation: The text states that the memory trace in the brain does not deteriorate merely due to the passage of time but it can also be caused to some underlying physical process

39. In retroactive inhibition, what is the name of the process of forgetting old things to absorb new knowledge?

Answer: UNLEARNING

Supporting statement:Some of the first list may be lost to memory in learning the second; this is called unlearning.

Keywords: learning, unlearning

Keyword Location: Para 5, Lines 2-3

Explanation: The text mentions that unlearning is the process in which a person might forget old things to allow the brain to acquire new knowledge.

40. What can be avoided when people learn two conflicting lists of words In two different times?

Answer: PROACTIVE INHIBITION

Supporting statement: Indeed, when two apparently conflicting lists are learned several days apart, proactive inhibition is markedly reduced

Keywords: conflicting, proactive

Keyword Location: Para 7, Line 9

Explanation: The text states that proactive inhibition can be avoided by learning two conflicting lists of words in some gap.

Read More IELTS Reading Related Samples