News
About Us
Contact Us

The Myth of Learning Styles Reading Answers

Bhaskar Das

Jul 17, 2025

The Myth of Learning Styles Reading Answers contains 14 questions and belongs to the assessment system of the IELTS General Reading test. The Myth of Learning Styles reading section must be answered within 20 minutes. In this IELTS reading passage, you'll encounter question types like Choose one word only, Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage? and Complete the summary using the list of words. Also, The Myth of Learning Styles Reading Answers explores why the popular learning styles theory lacks scientific support and how it may hinder students’ academic growth, despite widespread belief among teachers and students. To practice reading comprehension passages like this one, candidates are encouraged to explore the IELTS Reading Practice Test section.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic:

The idea that teaching methods should match a student's particular learning style — their personal way of learning — is popular with teachers and students alike. But the evidence suggests it may not be helpful. The concept of learning styles is one of the most influential

- and widely criticized - theories in education. It is the idea that each person finds it easier to learn through a particular method of instruction. Some people, for example, are thought to learn better when they're taught visually; others, when instruction is auditory, or through movement, and so on.

The idea is popular in part because it reflects the intuition of teachers and students. Everyone knows from personal experience that some kinds of learning feel easier than others, and that they may prefer one way of learning over another. And it is also popular because it claims to be based on science. The idea of learning styles was developed in the 1970s, as psychologists and educational theorists were trying to understand how people learn. The idea that different people learn information in different ways was appealing, and it soon became clear that many people had strong preferences about how they liked information to be presented. In a typical research study, one group of students might be classified as 'visual learners', while another group would be classified as 'auditory learners'. All the students would then be asked to learn something, with half the visual learners being taught visually, and half being taught aurally. The auditory learners would also be split into the two groups. If the theory was correct, the visual learners should do better when taught visually, and the auditory learners should do better when taught aurally.

But that's not what psychologists found. As early as 2004, a review of the evidence by cognitive scientists found that the great majority of studies did not provide any evidence supporting the idea that matching the material to a student's particular learning style was helpful. More recently, a team of psychologists led by Daniel Willingham at the University of Virginia has examined the evidence for learning styles again. They found that the vast majority of studies either found no evidence for the theory, or actually contradicted it.

As the researchers point out, people may have preferences about how they learn, but that doesn't mean that they will learn better when the teaching matches those preferences.

There are several possible explanations for these findings. One is that some students might not actually have a 'style' that is strong enough to affect their learning. Another possibility is that students do have preferences about how they learn, but these preferences don't affect their learning. A third possibility is that students do have preferences, and these preferences do affect their learning, but only because they have learned less well through other methods in the past. But the most likely explanation is that different ways of learning are useful for learning different things. For example, learning to drive a car involves a mix of visual learning (such as watching the instructor), auditory learning (listening to instructions), and hands-on learning (actually driving the car). In a 2009 article in the journal Psychological Science in the Public Interest, psychologists Harold Pashler, Mark McDaniel, Doug Rohrer and Robert Bjork argued that the learningstyles approach is not only unsupported by science, but may actually be harmful, because it leads teachers to teach students in ways that are not very effective. For example, a student who is a 'visual learner' might be encouraged to learn only through visual materials, and never to practice learning by listening, reading or acting.

The idea of learning styles is also harmful because it can give students the impression that they have fixed, or fixed amounts of, intelligence. In recent years, a great deal of research has shown that people's attitudes to learning can have a large impact on how much they learn. For example, students who believe that intelligence is fixed, and that they are either smart or stupid and there is nothing they can do about it, tend to do less well than students who believe that intelligence can change, and that they can become smarter by working hard at their studies. Similarly, students who have been told that they are 'visual learners' might put less effort into tasks that are based on reading or listening. This is particularly worrying because research has shown that students who use a mix of learning methods often learn more effectively than those who stick to their 'style'.

Despite the lack of evidence for learning styles, the idea is still very popular. A 2014 study of more than 400 teachers in the UK and the Netherlands found that more than 90 percent of them believed that people learn better if they are taught in their preferred learning style, and that the majority of them used learning styles as a method of instruction. In the US, a 2017 survey of more than 300 teachers found that 96 percent of them agreed with the idea of learning styles, and 24 percent of them used it to guide their teaching. The idea of learning styles is also popular among students. In a 2018 study, researchers asked more than 600 students in the US about their beliefs about learning. They found that 93 percent of them agreed with the idea of learning styles, and that 78 percent of them said that they had a particular learning style. The evidence is clear: matching teaching to a student's particular learning style is unlikely to lead to better learning. It may in fact be holding students back.

Questions 27-31

Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 3?

YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer

NO if the statement contradicts the views of the writer

NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

27. Teachers and students' personal experiences contribute to the popularity of the learning styles concept.

Answer: YES

Supporting statement: "The idea is popular in part because it reflects the intuition of teachers and students. Everyone knows from personal experience…"

Keywords: teachers, students, personal experience

Keyword Location: Paragraph 2, lines 1–2

Explanation: The passage confirms that teachers and students' personal experiences support the popularity of the learning styles theory.

28. Research into learning styles was popular in the 1970s.

Answer: YES

Supporting statement: "The idea of learning styles was developed in the 1970s…"

Keywords: developed, 1970s, learning styles

Keyword Location: Paragraph 2, line 3

Explanation: The author states that research into learning styles gained traction in the 1970s.

29. Psychologists found evidence for the idea of learning styles as early as 2004.

Answer: NO

Supporting statement: "…a review of the evidence… found that the great majority of studies did not provide any evidence supporting the idea…"

Keywords: review, 2004, no evidence

Keyword Location: Paragraph 3, line 2

Explanation: The review in 2004 did not support the learning styles theory; it refuted it.

30. The team of psychologists led by Daniel Willingham found evidence for the idea of learning styles.

Answer: NO

Supporting statement: "They found that the vast majority of studies either found no evidence for the theory, or actually contradicted it."

Keywords: Daniel Willingham, contradicted

Keyword Location: Paragraph 3, line 3

Explanation: Willingham’s team did not find supporting evidence; they found the opposite.

31. Students may learn better when they are taught using methods they are not familiar with.

Answer: YES

Supporting statement: "...students who use a mix of learning methods often learn more effectively..."

Keywords: mix, learning methods, effectively

Keyword Location: Paragraph 6, last line

Explanation: The author suggests students may learn better with unfamiliar or varied methods, rather than sticking to a preferred one.

Questions 32-33

Complete the summary using the list of words, A-F.

EXPLANATIONS FOR THE FINDINGS

One explanation is that some students might not have a strong enough 32...........

Answer: E (preference)

Supporting statement: "…students might not actually have a 'style' that is strong enough to affect their learning."

Keywords: style, strong enough

Keyword Location: Paragraph 4, line 1

Explanation: The lack of strong preference is given as a reason why learning style doesn't influence learning.

to affect their learning. Another possibility is that students may have preferences about how they learn, but these do not affect their 33……………….

Answer: D (learning)

Supporting statement: "...students may have preferences… but these preferences don't affect their learning."

Keywords: preferences, affect, learning

Keyword Location: Paragraph 4, line 2

Explanation: It is directly stated that preferences may exist but don’t influence actual learning outcomes.

A. harmful

B. ability

C. hands-on learning

D. learning

E. preference

F. useful

Questions 34-35

Complete the summary using the list of words, A-F.

A third possibility is that students' preferences do affect their learning, but only because they have learned less well through other methods in the past. The most likely explanation is that different ways of learning are useful for learning different things. For example, learning to drive a car involves visual learning, auditory learning and 34……….

Answer: C (hands-on learning)

Supporting statement: "…a mix of visual learning…, auditory learning…, and hands-on learning (actually driving the car)."

Keywords: driving, hands-on

Keyword Location: Paragraph 4, line 5

Explanation: The author describes how driving combines all three methods, including hands-on learning.

. The learning-styles approach is not only unsupported by science, but may actually be 35……………..

Answer: A (harmful)

Supporting statement: "…learning-styles approach… may actually be harmful…"

Keywords: harmful, learning styles

Keyword Location: Paragraph 5, line 1

Explanation: It is explicitly said that learning styles may be harmful, not just ineffective.

A. harmful

B. ability

C. hands-on learning

D. learning

E. preference

F. useful

Questions 36-40

Choose ONE WORD ONLY for each answer.

The idea of learning styles can give students the wrong idea about their level of 36………..;

Answer: intelligence

Supporting statement: "...learning styles is also harmful because it can give students the impression that they have fixed... intelligence."

Keywords: wrong idea, intelligence

Keyword Location: Paragraph 6, line 1

Explanation: The passage mentions students forming false beliefs about their level of intelligence.

Students who believe that intelligence can 37……………

Answer: change

Supporting statement: "...students who believe that intelligence can change… tend to do better…"

Keywords: intelligence, change, better

Keyword Location: Paragraph 6, line 3

Explanation: The author states that students who believe in change perform better.

tend to do better than other students. Students who have been told that they are 38……………….

Answer: visual

Supporting statement: "...students who have been told that they are 'visual learners' might put less effort…"

Keywords: visual learners, less effort

Keyword Location: Paragraph 6, line 4

Explanation: Visual learners might avoid other learning forms, leading to poorer outcomes.

Learners might not try so hard to learn by reading or listening. Research has shown that students who use a 39……………

Answer: mix

Supporting statement: "...students who use a mix of learning methods often learn more effectively…"

Keywords: mix, more effectively

Keyword Location: Paragraph 6, last line

Explanation: The passage promotes using a variety or mix of methods for better learning.

of learning methods often learn more effectively. In a 2018 study, 78 percent of students said that they had a particular 40………………

Answer: style

Supporting statement: "...78 percent of them said that they had a particular learning style."

Keywords: 78 percent, particular learning style

Keyword Location: Final paragraph, last lines

Explanation: The students identified themselves with a specific learning style.

Check IELTS reading samples:

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show
Practice Paper
Also Check
IELTS Overview
IELTS IELTS Exam Dates
IELTS IELTS Results
IELTS IELTS Writing Task 2
IELTS IELTS Reading
IELTS IELTS Speaking Topics
IELTS IELTS Preparation
IELTS IELTS Listening
IELTS IELTS Exam Pattern
IELTS IELTS Practice Papers
IELTS IELTS Coaching in India
IELTS IELTS Cutoff
IELTS News