To Deal with Global Warming, the First Step is to do the Number Reading Answers

Jul 5, 2025

To Deal with Global Warming, the First Step is to do the Number Reading Answers is an academic reading answers topic. To Deal with Global Warming, the First Step is to do the Number Reading Answers has a total of 13 IELTS questions in total. In the question set given, complete the summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage. Use no more than two words from the Reading Passage for each. In the next question set given, you have to state whether the statement is true, false or not given with the information given in the text

The IELTS Reading section is an essential part of the test that evaluates a candidate's comprehension and analysis of various passage types. You will work through a number of IELTS reading practice problems in this section that resemble actual test situations. These questions are designed to help you improve your ability to recognise essential concepts, extract particular facts, and make inferences. Practising these IELTS reading problems can help you get comfortable with the structure and increase your confidence for the exam, regardless of whether you are studying for the Academic or General Training module.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1 TO DEAL WITH GLOBAL WARMING, THE FIRST STEP IS TO DO THE NUMBER.

A.Here's how it works. Before the Industrial Revolution, the Earth's atmosphere contained about 280 parts per million of carbon dioxide. That was a good amount, "good" defined as "what we were used to. " Since the molecular structure of carbon dioxide traps heat near the planet's surface that would otherwise radiate back out to space, civilisation grew up in a world whose thermostat was set by that number. It equated to a global average temperature of about 57 degrees Fahrenheit (about 14 degrees Celsius), which in turn equated to all the places we built our cines, all the crops we learned to grow and eat, all the crops we learned to grow and eat, all the water supplies we learned to depend on, even the passage of the seasons that at higher

latitudes, set our psychological calendars.

B.Once we started burning coal and gas, and oil to power our lives, that 280 number started to rise. When we began measuring in the late 1950s, it had already reached the 315 level. Now it's at 380, and increasing by roughly two parts per million annually. That doesn't sound like very much, but it turns out that the extra heat that CO2 traps, a couple of watts per square meter of the Earth's surface, is enough to warm the planet considerably. We've raised the temperature more than a degree Fahrenheit (0.56 degrees Celsius) already. It's impossible to precisely predict the consequences of any further increase in CO2 in the atmosphere. But the warming we've seen so far has started almost everything frozen on Earth to melting; it has changed seasons and rainfall patterns; it's set the sea to rising.

C.No matter what we do now, that warming will increase some there's for time before the heat fully plays out in the atmosphere. That is, we can't stop global warming. Our task is less inspiring; to contain the damage, to keep things from getting out of control. And even that is not easy. For one thing, until recently, there's been no clear data suggesting the point where catastrophe looms. Now we're getting a better picture- the past couple of years have seen a

series of reports indicating that 450 parts per million CO2 are a threshold we'd be wise to respect. Beyond that point, scientists believe future centuries Will likely face the melting of the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets and a subsequent rise in sea level of giant proportion. Four hundred fifty parts per million is still a best (and it doesn't include the witches' brew of other, lesser, greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide). But it will serve as a target

of sorts for the world to aim at. a target that's moving fast. If concentrations keep increasing by two parts p [per million per year, we're only three and a half decades away,

D.So the math isn't complicated-but that doesn't mean it isn't intimidating. So far, only the Europeans and Japanese have even begun to trim their carbon emissions, and they may not meet their own modest targets. Meanwhile, U.S. carbon emissions, a quarter of the world’s total, continue to rise steadily. China and India are suddenly starting to produce huge quantities of C02 as well.

E.Everyone involved knows what the basic outlines of a deal that could avert catastrophe would 100k like; rapid, sustained, and dramatic cuts in emissions by the technologically advanced countries, coupled with large-scale technology transfer to the developing world so that they can power up their emerging economies without burning up their coal. Everyone knows the big question, too; Are such rapid cuts even possible?

F.The question is it even possible? It is usually addressed by fixating on some single new technology (hydrogen! ethanol!) and imagining it will solve our troubles. But the scale of the problem means we'll need many strategies. Most people have heard of some of them; more fuel-efficient cars, better-built homes, wind turbines biofuels like ethanol. Others are newer and less Sure; plans for building coal-fired power plants that can separate carbon from the exhaust so it can be sequestered" underground.

G.These approaches have one thing in common; They're more difficult than simply burning fossil fuel. They force us to realise that we've already had our magic fuel and that what comes next will be in the trillions of dollars. Of course, along the way, it will create myriad new jobs, and when it's complete, it may be a much more elegant system. And since we're wasting so much energy now, some of the first tasks would be relatively easy. If we replaced every incandescent bulb that burned out in the next decade anyplace in the world with a compact fluorescent, we'd make an impressive start on one of the 15 wedges. But in that same decade, we'd need to build 400000 large wind turbines clearly possible, but only with real commitment. We'd need to follow the lead of Germany and Japan and seriously subsidize rooftop solar panels; we'd need to get most of the world's farmers ploughing their fields less, to build back the carbon their soils have lost. We'd need to do everything all at once.

H.As precedents for such collective effort, people sometimes point to the Manhattan project to build a nuclear weapon or the Apollo Program to put a man on the moon. But those analogies don't really work. They demanded the intense concentration of money and intelligence on a single small niche in our technosphere. Now we need almost the opposite, a commitment to take what we already know how to do and somehow spread it into every corner of our economies, and indeed our most basic activities. It's as if NASA's goal had been to put all of us on the moon.

l.Not all the answers are technological, of course, maybe not even most of them. Many of the paths to stabilization run straight through our daily lives, and in every case, they will demand difficult changes. Air travel is one of the fastest-growing sources of carbon emissions around the world, for instance, but even many of us who are noble about changing lightbulbs and happy to drive hybrid cars chafe at the thought of not jetting around the country or the world. By now, we're used to ordering take-out food from every corner of the world every night of our lives according to one study, the average bite of food has travelled nearly 1500 miles (2414 kilometers) before it reaches an American's lips, which means it's been marinated in (crude) oil. drive alone, because it's more convenient than adjusting our schedules for public transit. We build ever bigger homes even as our family sizes shrink, and we watch ever bigger TVs and well, enough said. We need to figure out how to change those habits.

J.Probably the only way that will happen is if fossil fuel costs us considerably more. If what we paid for axon of gas reflected even a portion of its huge environmental cost, we'd be driving small cars to the train station, just like the Europeans. And we'd riding bikes when the sun shone.

K.The most straightforward way to raise the price would be to tax on carbon; but that's not easy. Since everyone needs to use fuel, it would be regressive -you'd have to figure out how to keep from hurting poor people unduly. And we'd need to be grown-up enough to have a real conversation about taxes -say, about switching away from taxes on a thing we like (employment) to taxes on things we hate (global warming),

L.In the end, global warming presents the greatest test we humans have yet faced. Are we ready to change, in dramatic and prolonged ways, in order to offer a workable future to subsequent generations and diverse forms of life? If we are, new technologies and new habits offer some promise. It's our coming-of-age moment, and there are no certainties or guarantees. Only a window of possibility, closing fast but still ajar enough to let in some hope.

Questions 1–8

Complete the following summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage.

Using NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the Reading Passage for each.

Several hundred years ago, the amount of carbon dioxide contained in the Earth's atmosphere 1......... was parts per million. However, with a growth of about 2......... parts per million every year, the number has risen from 3......... in the late 1950s to the current.4 ......... As scientists believe, the figure should exceed 5........... parts per million; otherwise, humans will be faced with a significant rise of sea level. Considering the severity of the problem, various approaches are needed to tackle it. Parts of the solutions are 6........., like fuel-efficient cars and wind turbines, but many other ways to cut down carbon dioxide emission lie in our 7......... In other words, it is necessary for us to change some of our habits, such as to reduce our reliance on air travel and car use. Perhaps the most direct way will be to impose a 8.........on carbon to discourage people to use fossil fuel by increasing the price.

1.........

Answer: 280

Supporting statement: Before the Industrial Revolution, the Earth's atmosphere contained about 280 parts per million of carbon dioxide.

Keywords: Revolution, 280 parts

Keyword Location: Para A, Lines 1-2

Explanation: As per the text, we can see that several hundred years ago, the amount of carbon dioxide contained in the Earth’s atmosphere was 280 parts per million.

2.........

Answer: 2

Supporting statement: Now it's at 380, and increasing by roughly two parts per million annually

Keywords: 380, two parts

Keyword Location: Para B, Line 3

Explanation: According to the text, after people started utilising fossil fuels, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere started to rise quickly. Since the late 1950s, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has been growing at a rate of approximately two parts per million per year.

3.........

Answer: 315

Supporting statement: When we began measuring in the late 1950s, it had already reached the 315 level.

Keywords: 1950s,315

Keyword Location: Para B, Line 2

Explanation: The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increased as a result of the usage of coal, gas, and oil for energy production. When scientists began measuring CO2 levels in the late 1950s, the concentration had already increased to 315 parts per million.

4.........

Answer: 380

Supporting statement: in the late 1950s, it had already reached the 315 level. Now it's at 380, and increasing

Keywords: 380, increasing

Keyword Location: Para B, Line 3

Explanation: The use of fossil fuels by humans caused the concentration of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere to rise sharply. As a result, by the end of the 1950s, the level started increasing steadily, hitting 380 parts per million

5.........

Answer: 450

Supporting statement: Now we're getting a better picture- the past couple of years have seen a series of reports indicating that 450 parts per million CO2 are a threshold

Keywords: 450, CO2

Keyword Location: Para C, Line 6

Explanation: According to the text, recent reports and scientific discoveries indicate that we as humans should exercise caution to avoid exceeding the critical threshold of 450 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere.

6.........

Answer: TECHNOLOGY

Supporting statement: Not all the answers are technological, of course, maybe not even most of them.

Keywords: answers, technological

Keyword Location: Para I, Line 1

Explanation: The passages state that not all technical solutions to environmental issues are necessary; in fact, many of them call for adjustments to our day-to-day activities. These solutions require difficult adjustments in each of these scenarios.

7.........

Answer: DAILY LIVES

Supporting statement: Many of the paths to stabilisation run straight through our daily lives, and in every case, they will demand difficult changes.

Keywords: daily lives, difficult

Keyword Location: Para I, Line 2

Explanation: According to the texts, not all technical fixes for environmental problems are required; in fact, a lot of them include changes to our daily lives.

8.........

Answer: TAX

Supporting statement: The most straightforward way to raise the price would be to tax on carbon;

Keywords: tax, carbon

Keyword Location: Para K, Line 1

Explanation: A carbon tax would be the easiest and straightforward way to raise the cost of carbon emissions. However, it is not a simple or easy task to implement such a tax.

Questions 9-13

Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage I? In boxes on your answer sheet, write

True - If the statement is true.

False - If the statement is false

Not Given - If the information is not given in the passage.

9. There has already been explicit evidence showing 450 parts per million CO2 is the point beyond which disasters will take place.

Answer: FALSE

Supporting statement: Now we're getting a better picture- the past couple of years have seen a series of reports indicating that 450 parts per million CO2 are a threshold we'd be wise to respect.

Keywords: years, million

Keyword Location: Para C, Lines 5-6

Explanation: According to current reports and scientific discoveries, 450 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide (C02) in the atmosphere is a vital level that we should be careful not to cross, as these lines in the text imply. It's crucial to remember, though, that the statement opposes the author's view.

10. The developing countries have contributed the most to the total CO2 emission around the world.

Answer: NOT GIVEN

Explanation: According to the text, we know that the United States' carbon emissions, which account for 25% of global emissions, are gradually rising. Additionally, China and India have both lately begun to produce significant amounts of CO2. Nevertheless, it is unclear if developing countries make up the majority of global carbon dioxide emissions, as no clear information about the same is given in the text.

11. Humans will have to pay a heavy price for the awful mess after their ease to burn fossil fuel.

Answer: TRUE

Supporting statement: Probably the only way that will happen is if fossil fuel costs us considerably more.

Keywords: fossil fuel, costs

Keyword Location: Para J, Line 1

Explanation: According to the text, a major increase in the price of fossil fuels is the most likely scenario for reducing our usage of them. Therefore, the answer is true since the statement clearly states that humans will be paying significant costs for the disastrous mess caused by their ease of burning fossil fuels.

12. The collective effort to cut down carbon emission is just like that of the Manhattan Project or the Apollo Program.

Answer: FALSE

Supporting statement: As precedents for such collective effort, people sometimes point to the Manhattan project to build a nuclear weapon or the Apollo Program to put a man on the moon.

Keywords: Manhattan, Apollo Program

Keyword Location: Para H, Lines 1-2

Explanation: According to the passage, it is inaccurate and inappropriate to compare group attempts to address current problems, like climate change, to past initiatives like the Apollo Program or the Manhattan Project. These comparisons are, therefore, inappropriate and inaccurate.

13. Many people are reluctant to accept the idea of not travelling around by plane.

Answer: TRUE

Supporting statement: Air travel is one of the fastest-growing sources of carbon emissions around the world, for instance, but even many of us who are noble about changing lightbulbs and happy to drive hybrid cars chafe at the thought of not jetting around the country or the world.

Keywords: carbon emissions, country

Keyword Location: Para I, Lines 3-5

Explanation: Even though air travel is a significant source of carbon emissions and contributes to environmental problems, the text suggests that although many individuals are prepared to make eco-friendly decisions like switching to energy-efficient lightbulbs and driving hybrid automobiles, they could be unwilling to cut back on their air travel.

Read More IELTS Reading Related Samples