The Unselfish Gene Reading Answers

Jul 3, 2025

The Unselfish Gene Reading Answers is an academic reading answers topic. The Unselfish Gene Reading Answers has a total of 13 IELTS questions in total. The question asked in the Unselfish Gene Reading Answers is as follows: Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D. Choose ONE WORD ONLY for each. And to state whether the statement is yes, no or not given according to the passage

The candidate's understanding and assessment of academic and general texts are examined in the IELTS Reading Section. By using IELTS Reading Practice Questions, you can increase your vocabulary, sharpen your critical reading skills, and become more familiar with the various question types in reading tasks. Furthermore, practice enhances vocabulary and improves analytical reading skills, both of which are necessary for success. It's critical to comprehend the guidelines for every question type and create effective ways to manage time if you wish to receive excellent band scores.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1 THE UNSELFISH GENE

A psychologist gives his view on how humans became self-centred

There has long been a general assumption that human beings are essentially selfish. We're apparently ruthless, with strong impulses to compete against each other for resources and to accumulate power and possessions. If we are kind to one another, it's usually because

we have ulterior motives. If we are good, it's only because we have managed to control and transcend our innate selfishness and brutality. This bleak view of human nature is closely associated with the science writer Richard Dawkins, whose 1976 book The Selfish Gene

became popular because it fitted so well with - and helped to justify - the competitive and individualistic ethos that was so prevalent in late 20th-century societies. Like many others, Dawkins justifies his views with reference to the field of evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary

psychology theorises that present-day human traits developed in prehistoric times, during what is termed the ‘environment of evolutionary adaptedness'.

Prehistory is usually seen as a period of intense competition, when life was such a brutal battle that only those with traits such as selfishness, aggression and ruthlessness survived. And because survival depended on access to resources - such as rivers, forests and animals - there was bound to be conflict between rival groups, which led to the development of traits such as racism and warfare. This seems logical. But, in fact, the assumption on which this all rests - that prehistoric life was a desperate struggle for survival - is false. It's important to remember that in the prehistoric era, the world was very sparsely populated. According to some estimates, around 15,000 years ago, the population of Europe was only 29,000, and the population of the whole world was less than half a million. Humans at that time were hunter-gatherers: people who lived by hunting wild animals and collecting wild plants.

With such small population densities, it seems unlikely that prehistoric hunter-gatherer groups had to compete against each other for resources or had any need to develop ruthlessness and competitiveness, or to go to war. There is significant evidence to back this notion from contemporary hunter-gatherer groups, who live in the same way as prehistoric humans did. As the anthropologist Bruce Knauft has remarked, hunter-gatherers are characterized by 'extreme political and sexual egalitarianism'. Knauft has observed that individuals in such groups don't accumulate property or possessions and have an ethical obligation to share everything. They also have methods of preserving egalitarianism by ensuring that disparities of status don't arise.

The !Kung people of Southern Africa, for example, swap arrows before going hunting and when an animal is killed, the acclaim does not go to the person who fired the arrow, but to the person the arrow belongs to. And if a person becomes too domineering, the other members of the group ostracise them, exiling the offender from society. Typically in such groups, men do not dictate what women do. Women in hunter-gatherer groups worldwide often benefit from a high level of autonomy, being able to select their own marriage partners, decide what work they do and work whenever they choose to. And if a marriage breaks down, they have custody rights over their children.

Many anthropologists believe that societies such as the !Kung were normal until a few thousand years ago, when population growth led to the development of agriculture and a settled lifestyle. In view of the above, there seems little reason to assume that traits such as racism, warfare and male domination should have been selected by evolution — as they would have been of little benefit in the prehistoric era. Individuals who behaved selfishly and ruthlessly would be less likely to survive, since they would have been ostracised from their groups. It makes more sense. then, to see traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness as innate characteristics of human beings. These were the traits that were prevalent in human life for tens of thousands of years. So, presumably these traits are still strong in us now.

But if prehistoric life wasn't really as brutal as has often been assumed, why do modern humans behave so selfishly and ruthlessly? Perhaps these negative traits should be seen as a later development, the result of environmental and psychological factors. Research has shown repeatedly that when the natural habitats of primates such as apes and gorillas are disrupted, they tend to become more violent and hierarchical. So, it could well be that the same thing has happened to us. I believe that the end of the hunter-gatherer lifestyle and the advent of farming was connected to a psychological change that occurred in some groups of people. There was a new sense of individuality and separateness, which led to a new selfishness, and ultimately to hierarchical societies, patriarchy and warfare. At any rate, these negative traits appear to have developed so recently that it doesn't seem feasible to explain them in adaptive or evolutionary terms.

Questions 27–30 Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

27 What is the writer doing in the first paragraph?

A. setting out two opposing views about human nature

B. justifying his opinion about our tendency to be greedy

C. describing a commonly held belief about people's behaviour

D. explaining why he thinks that humans act in a selfish manner

Answer: C

Supporting statement: There has long been a general assumption that human beings are essentially selfish.

Keywords: human beings, selfish

Keyword Location: Para 1, Line 1

Explanation: In the first paragraph of the given text, an assumption about human beings' behaviour being selfish is given by the writer

28. What point is made about Richard Dawkins' book The Selfish Gene?

A. Its appeal lay in the radical nature of its ideas.

B. Its success was due to the scientific support it offered.

C. It presented a view that was in line with the attitudes of its time.

D. It took an innovative approach to the analysis of human psychology.

Answer: C

Supporting statement: because it fitted so well with - and helped to justify - the competitive and individualistic ethos that was so prevalent in late 20th-century societies.

Keywords: competitive, 20th-century

Keyword Location: Para 1, Lines 7-8

Explanation: The Selfish Gene, a book by Richard Dawkins, gained popularity because it aligned so well with and served to validate the competitive and individualistic mentality that shaped late 20th-century societies.

29. What does the writer suggest about the prehistoric era in the second paragraph?

A. Societies were more complex than many people believe.

B. Supplies of natural resources were probably relatively plentiful.

C. Most estimates about population sizes are likely to be inaccurate.

D. Humans moved across continents more than was previously thought.

Answer: B

Supporting statement: This seems logical. But, in fact, the assumption on which this all rests - that prehistoric life was a desperate struggle for survival - is false.

Keywords: prehistoric, struggle

Keyword Location: Para 2, Line 6

Explanation: According to the second paragraph, natural resources were not scarce during the prehistoric era.

30. The writer refers to Bruce Knauft's work as support for the idea that

A. selfishness is a relatively recent development in human societies.

B. only people in isolated communities can live in an unselfish manner.

C. very few lifestyles have survived unchanged since prehistoric times.

D. hunter-gatherer cultures worldwide are declining in number.

Answer: A

Supporting statement: Perhaps these negative traits should be seen as a later development, the result of environmental and psychological factors.

Keywords: development, psychological

Keyword Location: Para 6, Lines 2-3

Explanation: According to the text, the writer uses Bruce Knauft's work to support the idea that the selfish trait of humans might have developed recently due to environmental and psychological factors.

Questions 31-35

Choose ONE WORD ONLY for each.

CONTEMPORARY HUNTER-GATHERER SOCIETIES

Bruce Kauft's research shows that contemporary hunter-gatherer societies tend to exhibit a high level of 31…………in all areas of life. In these cultures, distributing resources fairly among all members is a moral obligation. These societies also employ strategies to prevent differences in 32………… occurring: for example, the !Kung follow a custom whereby the credit for one person's success at 33………… is given to another member of the group. Individuals who behave in a 34…………manner are punished by being excluded from the group, and women have a considerable amount of 35…………choices regarding work and marriage.

31…………

Answer: EGALITARIANISM

Supporting statement: Bruce Knauft has remarked, hunter-gatherers are characterized by 'extreme political and sexual egalitarianism'.

Keywords: Bruce Knauft, egalitarianism

Keyword Location: Para 3, Lines 5-6

Explanation: According to Bruce Kauft's research, modern hunter-gatherer tribes typically display a high degree of sexual and political equality in every aspect of life.

32…………

Answer: STATUS

Supporting statement: They also have methods of preserving egalitarianism by ensuring that disparities of status don't arise.

Keywords: preserving, status

Keyword Location: Para 3, Line 8

Explanation: According to the text, the hunter-gatherer tribes had a method which helped them to ensure that egalitarianism is preserved, to ensure that no issue arises in the status of people.

33…………

Answer: HUNTING

Supporting statement: The !Kung people of Southern Africa, for example, swap arrows before going hunting and when an animal is killed,

Keywords: Southern Africa, hunting

Keyword Location: Para 4, Line 1

Explanation: As per the text, when an animal is killed, the !Kung people of Southern Africa exchange arrows before hunting and give credit to the owner of the arrow rather than the person who shot it.

34…………

Answer: DOMINEERING

Supporting statement: And if a person becomes too domineering, the other members of the group ostracise them, exiling the offender from society.

Keywords: domineering, exiling

Keyword Location: Para 4, Line 3

Explanation: According to the text, any person who starts to dominate the other gets exiled from the group as a part of the punishment.

35…………

Answer: AUTONOMY

Supporting statement: Women in hunter-gatherer groups worldwide often benefit from a high level of autonomy,

Keywords: Women, autonomy

Keyword Location: Para 4, Lines 5-6

Explanation: As per the paragraph, women in the hunter-gatherer groups were given autonomy, which allowed them to choose who they wished to marry, select what work they wanted to do and when they wanted to do it. They also have the right to custody of their children in the event of a divorce.

Questions 36-40

Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage 3? Write

YES - if the statement agrees with the views of the writer

NO - if the statement contradicts the views of the writer

NOT GIVEN - if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

36. Some anthropologists are mistaken about the point when the number of societies such as the !Kung began to decline.

Answer: NOT GIVEN

Explanation: No information is given in the text regarding the above-asked statement.

37. Humans who developed warlike traits in prehistory would have had an advantage over those who did not.

Answer: NO

Supporting statement: Individuals who behaved selfishly and ruthlessly would be less likely to survive,

Keywords: selfishly, survive

Keyword Location: Para 5, Line 5

Explanation: According to the text, any individual who behaved arrogantly and selfishly they were driven out of the group as a punishment, so it was less likely for them to survive all alone by themselves.

38. Being peaceful and cooperative is a natural way for people to behave.

Answer: YES

Supporting statement: It makes more sense. then, to see traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness as innate characteristics of human beings.

Keywords: cooperation, peacefulness

Keyword Location: Para 5, Line 7

Explanation: According to the text, people in the prehistoric era used to have traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness.

39. Negative traits are more apparent in some modern cultures than in others.

Answer: NOT GIVEN

Explanation: No information about negative traits being more apparent in some modern cultures as compared to others.

40. Animal research has failed to reveal a link between changes in the environment and the emergence of aggressive tendencies.

Answer: NO

Supporting statement: Research has shown repeatedly that when the natural habitats of primates such as apes and gorillas are disrupted, they tend to become more violent and hierarchical.

Keywords: primates, violent

Keyword Location: Para 6, Lines 4-5

Explanation: According to the text, research shows that if an animal's natural habitat is disrupted, it becomes more violent and starts showing hierarchical changes.

Read More IELTS Reading Related Samples