Zoos are Sometimes seen as Necessary but not Poor Alternatives to a Natural Environment IELTS Writing Task 2

Zoos are Sometimes seen as Necessary but not Poor Alternatives to a Natural Environment IELTS Writing Task 2 have three model answers. This IELTS topic requires candidates to provide an opinion based on zoo vs natural environment. Zoos are Sometimes seen as Necessary but not Poor Alternatives to a Natural Environment IELTS Writing Task 2 requires candidates to provide argumentative statements and support it with logical statements.

Candidates can score higher IELTS writing score with inclusion of an introduction, a logical and argumentative body and a potential conclusion. This can be attained with repeated practice from IELTS Writing practice papers that will help candidates to get familiar with several different types of topics. This particular topic Zoos are Sometimes seen as Necessary but not Poor Alternatives to a Natural Environment IELTS Writing Task 2 has been taken from the book 100 Ielts Writing Academic and General Task 2 - Band 8 - Volume 8

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment. Discuss some of the arguments for and against keeping animals in zoos.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Band 7.5 IELTS Essay

Sometimes, people think that zoological gardens are a must-have but poor substitute for a natural setting. Some people believe that zoos are necessary, while others disagree and oppose keeping animals in zoos. In the following passage, I go over both sides of the argument and which I strongly concur with.

It is our duty to protect animals because they are an essential component of nature. Animals on the verge of extinction benefit greatly from the conservation efforts undertaken by zoos.

They aid in the preservation of endangered animal species. Second, the animals at zoos are given complete care and attention. They get food, are cleaned, and have all the other necessities. Thirdly, they give people something to do that keeps them occupied. Seeing animals like lions and bears from such a short distance is very fascinating. They not only provide children with entertainment but also teach them about a wide variety of animals while keeping them completely anonymous. They are sparked to learn more about the animal kingdom as a result. Most importantly, they are shielded from the barbaric human activities of hunting and poaching.

However, zoos' drawbacks should never be overlooked. The animals spend their entire lives in chains. Their freedom of movement is restricted. Since elephants and monkeys live in groups, they ought to be released into the wild. Second, because they are unable to hunt, animals completely forget their instincts and may even die as a result. They are completely dependent on others and may become lethargic.

In conclusion, zoos must be visited because they protect the animal kingdom from extinction. Additionally, they provide knowledge. However, herding and group-dwelling animals should remain in their natural habitat.

Band 7 IELTS Essay

For centuries, zoos have entertained visitors and educated them about animals. However, the issue of animal confinement in zoos is becoming increasingly contentious. While others refute this, some argue that keeping animals in cages at zoos is both necessary and beneficial to their health. Before drawing a logical conclusion, this essay will examine both sides of the debate.

On one hand, a lot of people think that keeping animals in a fake zoo is a good way to keep many species from going extinct. For instance, numerous breeding programs are in place at the Auckland Zoo to enable animals to mate and reproduce. It's possible that these animals won't be able to mate in the wild, which could result in the extinction of their species. Using this example, it is easy to see why this position is popular.

On the other hand, a lot of people say that keeping animals in a zoo is bad for these primates. For instance, a recent survey revealed that visitors to the Karachi, Pakistan, zoo gave toxic substances to the animals, which was bad for their health. If appropriate safety measures are not taken, animals in zoos can be abused, as this example demonstrates. Therefore, it is clear why this viewpoint has gained support.

When both sides of this argument are considered, it is concluded that keeping animals in zoos has more advantages than disadvantages, provided that safety precautions are taken. Zoos are hoped to continue halting the extinction of endangered species.

Band 6 IELTS Essay

Poaching animals, destroying their natural habitats, and destroying their peace of mind are all barbaric acts. Animals and other living things were closely coordinated by humans from very ancient times. They have been keeping them as pets, growing them, and even eating them in a variety of ways. Therefore, depending on how one looks at the situation, keeping animals in zoos can be seen as both beneficial and detrimental.

Regarding the positive aspects, climate change is rapidly causing disastrous effects on animals' lives, such as wildfires and intense cold. With the assistance of an artificial ecosystem like the zoo, endangered animal species can be saved from such calamitous situations where millions of species are dead or in danger. In addition, zoos are thought to be a place where children can enjoy and learn about a variety of rare species, as well as a location for research.

On the other hand, environmentalists frequently dismiss a zoo as an unsafe location for animals and birds due to the confinement and artificial ecosystem to which animals must adapt. While small iron cages are used to confine the otherwise free animals and birds, zoos frequently serve as the sole location where men can view the animals and enjoy themselves. Additionally, the authority makes cruel attempts to extort money from the animals and entertain visitors.

It is possible to say that zoos can sometimes be seen as necessary, but they are a rather poor alternative to a natural environment.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Samples

• The Young Today Spend A Large Amount Of Their Leisure Time In Shopping Centers IELTS Writing Task 2
• Tourism Should Be Banned In Some Areas To Protect Culture IELTS Writing Task 2
• In Some Countries More and More People Becoming Interested in Finding Out About the History of the House IELTS Writing Task 2
• Increasing Business and Cultural Contact between Countries is a Positive Development IELTS Writing Task 2
• It is Impossible to Help All People in the World IELTS Writing Task 2
• Students Perform Better In School When They Are Rewarded Rather Than Punished IELTS Writing Task 2
• Celebrities Earn More Money than Other Professionals. Is this Justified? IELTS Writing Task 2
• In Today’s World Private Companies Rather Than Government Pay for and Conduct Scientific Research IELTS Writing Task 2
• An International Car Free Day Is A Solution To Air Pollution IELTS Writing Task 2
• Space Travel Has Been Made Possible for Some Time IELTS Writing Task 2
• Advantages and Disadvantages of Tourism in the Modern World IELTS Writing Task 2
• Happiness is Considered Very Important in Life IELTS Writing Task 2
• Employers Nowadays Put More Emphasis on Social Skills IELTS Writing Task 2
• Global Warming is One of the Biggest Threats to Our Environment IELTS Writing Task 2
• It is Becoming Popular to Research the History of One’s Own Family IELTS Writing Task 2
• More And More Plastic Waste Is Polluting Cities, Country Sides And Oceans IELTS Writing Task 2
• Some Students Work While Studying IELTS Writing Task 2
• In Many Countries Spend More Time Far Away From Their Families IELTS Writing Task 2
• The Increase in People’s Life Expectancy IELTS Writing Task 2
• Every Country has Different Ways of Dealing with the Poor IELTS Writing Task 2