Undergraduates and Postgraduates Were asked about a Range of Books in their Library IELTS Writing Task 1

Both groups have distinct viewpoints when comparing the survey findings for the books that are easily accessible. With regard to the books that are offered, a sizable portion of undergraduate students are either pleased (37%) or satisfied (35%). Approximately 28% of students believe that books are bad. The situation is different for postgraduate students, where 50% of the students have expressed criticism of the texts. While two-thirds of students said that the number of books available was either good or satisfactory. However, when it comes to the outcome of non-printed materials, there is a stark disparity. Most students (68%) thought the digital versions of the course material were excellent, while only 12% reported problems. However, only 16% of senior students offered good feedback, and 62% of them felt that the non-printed information had not helped them. In conclusion, we can state that, as shown by the pie charts, the majority of student votes were quite favourable toward non-print materials. Although the contrary was true for postgraduates, as they were quite dissatisfied with printed and non-printed material, both.

On one side, 28% of undergraduates thought that the library had a wide selection of books, while 50% of postgraduates said that the choice of books was poor. A large variety of books had a 37 percent satisfaction rate, followed by a 35 percent satisfaction rate among students. Postgraduates made up 22% of those who said they were extremely satisfied with the selection of books, compared to a satisfaction rate of 28%. The majority of postgraduates (62%) and undergraduates (68%), respectively, held the opinion that non-print material was not excellent. Graduates and postgraduates made up 20% and 22%, respectively, of those who were happy with the non-printed material. Finally, just 16 percent of postgraduates thought non-print content was very good, compared to 12 percent of undergraduates who thought it was poor. In summary, we can say that the majority of student votes were overwhelmingly in favour of non-print resources, as evidenced by the pie charts. The opposite, however, was true for postgraduates, who were quite unsatisfied with both printed and non-printed materials.

The books were deemed to be satisfactory by 35% of students while being deemed to be very good by 37% of them. Only 28% of the participants believed the printed materials were poor. With as much as 68% of undergraduates giving non-printed products a very good or excellent rating, they obtained significantly better evaluations. 12% of undergraduates were apparently dissatisfied with the electronic study resources in their library, compared to 20% who were satisfied with them. It's interesting to note that either printed or non-printed study materials didn't exactly make postgraduates pleased. However, 62% of them felt the same way about non-printed goods, whereas just 50% of them gave books a bad rating. Postgraduates were more satisfied with printed materials than non-printed ones (22% versus 16% respectively). Only 22% of them felt the same way about non-print materials, while 28% of them said books were adequate. The pie charts show that, in general, students strongly preferred non-print resources, which is what can be concluded from the results. Postgraduates, on the other hand, found both printed and non-printed materials to be of low quality, which was the exact reverse of what undergraduates found.