Under British and Australian Laws a Jury in a Criminal Case Has no Access to Information IELTS Writing Task 2

Nov 28, 2022

Under British and Australian Laws a Jury in a Criminal Case Has no Access to Information IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answers have been provided below. This is an opinion oriented topic raising points of discussion. Candidates are required to address the legal aspects in this essay associated with British and Australia. Answers below begin with an opinion and follow a brief explanation to justify the statement. It has been divided into two parts; introduction and body. Introduction highlights the opinion of the candidates on the given topic. It also provides examples of real life situations. The body in the essay has three paragraphs that highlight statements to justify the opinion.

IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant’s past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

Band 6 IELTS Essay

In Australia and England, the tribunal is not informed of the accused's prior criminal history. Some attorneys contend that having access to all of the defendant's prior records helps courts render just verdicts. I firmly believe that the jury should be made aware of the background of the accused because doing so will benefit both the board and the defendant.

The fact that it stops the bench from making prejudiced decisions is one compelling argument in favour of changing your procedure. The severity of the penalties is influenced by the criminal history of the accused. Repeat offenders, like serial killers or rapists, should be subject to harsher punishments. On the other hand, offenders who commit crimes while under the influence of alcohol or drugs should be treated more leniently. Therefore, a fair judgement or stance from the board would result from having a holistic viewpoint of the defendant as a whole.

Furthermore, if records are taken into consideration, innocent people will benefit because their innocence won't be misinterpreted. A female could kill someone to prevent being raped. Because of her spotless criminal record, the girl may be spared harsh punishments like the death penalty or life in prison. In the past, it has also been made known about the criminal's social background, upbringing, education, moral character, and state of health. Because of this, the jury's decision-making panel will be able to understand the convict's point of view and reach a clear-cut, logical choice.

The accused's extensive prior criminal history must also be disclosed to the tribunal in order for the verdict to be accurate.

Band 8 IELTS Essay

A jury in a criminal case has no access to the data of the defendant's previous criminal records. Under the legal system, particularly in the United Kingdom and Australia. This is an unnecessary advantage for the alleged criminal. However, a few lawyers suggested that this practice be changed and that a jury be made aware of all prior facts before passing judgment. In this essay, I would like to express my support for the idea that all necessary information should be provided to the jury to achieve a better outcome.

First and foremost, the perpetrator of a crime usually has a criminal history. Tracking their previous records can provide a vital thread for current criminal investigations. For example, a recent article in a newspaper revealed that a person who was teasing a young woman was a serial killer. Who in the past, targeted young working ladies out of jealousy because a woman had cheated on him. Because of this valuable information, he was apprehended quickly, and further harm to society was successfully avoided. If the judge was unaware of it, the criminal would not be harshly punished for his actions, so it must be mandatory.

Second, the judicial system has a variety of punishments that vary depending on the crime. When it comes to a single crime, it is far less serious than a series of crimes. In this case, if the judge is unaware of the previous criminal records. He may simply impose a simple form of punishment for the current crime, leaving a massive iceberg unnoticed. If this occurs, many guilty people will be able to walk around confidently and continue with their crimes because they will go unnoticed. For example, a minor thief becomes a bank robber after being released on parole several times for a less serious crime. As a result, it should be mandatory for the jury to review all of the guilty person's prior information.

Finally, to conclude, I wholeheartedly agree and strongly support the fact. That the judicial system should be supported with crystal clear information before final judgment. This will be enormously beneficial to humanity.

Band 7 IELTS Essay

As per British and Australian laws, a criminal case has no access to the defendant's previous criminal records. This is an unnecessary advantage for the accused individual. However, a few lawyers suggested that this practice be changed. The authorities should be made aware of all prior facts before proceeding with the judgment.

Mostly, the perpetrator of a crime usually has a criminal history. Criminal investigations will have a vital lead if the prior history can be tracked. According to a recent article in a newspaper, a cab driver was found guilty of morder. On checking his previous criminal records, he was found reported for teasing young women who used to board the cab. Because of this valuable information, he was apprehended quickly. If the judge was unaware of it, the criminal would not be punished harshly for his actions. He would also continue to do crimes without the fear of being caught.

The judiciary system has a variety of punishments depending on the severity of the crime. When it comes to a single crime, there are far fewer than many. If the judge is unaware of the previous criminal records, he may punish the convict based on one simple crime. The bucket of crimes committed previously gets unnoticed. If this occurs, many guilty people will be able to walk around confidently and continue with their crimes because they will go unnoticed. For example, a person is caught because he committed theft in the market. This person also committed a bank robbery before that. If the information is not provided to the judges, the person gets a small punishment just for the theft.

Finally, to conclude, I agree and strongly support the fact that the judicial system should be provided with clear information before final judgment. This will enormously be beneficial to society and humanity.

Check – IELTS Writing Samples