Three Dimensional Films Reading Answers

Dec 27, 2022

Three Dimensional Films Reading Answers is a topic of discussion about the evolution of third dimensional movies. The given IELTS topic has been originated from the book called “Cambridge IELTS 6 Audio CDs”. The topic named Painters of Three Dimensional Films Reading Answers comes with 13 sets of questions. There are two types of questions, that is, choose the correct heading, and matching the information. The candidates should read thoroughly the IELTS reading passage in order to recognize the synonyms and identify the keywords and for answering the questions below. Similar kinds of topics like Three Dimensional Films Reading Answers are included in the IELTS reading practice papers, which the candidates can take into their consideration for performing a good score in this section.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers

Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1

Read the Passage to Answer the Following Questions

Three Dimensional Films Reading Answers

In the theatre of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles, on the evening of 27 September 1922, a new form of film-making made its commercial debut: 3-D. The film – The Power of Love was then shown in New York City to exhibitors and press but was subsequently not picked up for distribution and is now believed to be lost. The following three decades were a period of quiet experimentation for 3-D pioneers, as they adapted to new technologies and steadily improved the viewing experience. In 1952, the “golden era” of 3-D is considered to have begun with the release of Bwana Devil, and over the next several years, audiences met with a string of films that used the technology. Over the following decades, it waxed and waned within the film-making circles, peaking in the 1970s and again in the 1990s when IMAX gained traction, but it is only in the last few years that 3-D appears to have firmly entered mainstream production.
Released worldwide in December 2009, the fantasy film Avatar quickly became the highest-grossing film ever made, knocking Titanic from the top slot. Avatar, set in 2154 on a planet in a distant solar system, went on to become the only film to have earned US$2 billion worldwide and is now approaching the $3 billion mark. The main reason for its runaway popularity appears to be its visual splendour; though most critics praised the film, it was mostly on account of its ground-breaking special effects. Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times praised Avatar’s “powerful” visual accomplishments, but suggested the dialogue was “flat” and the characterizations “obvious”. A film analyst at Exhibitor Relations has agreed, noting that Avatar has cemented the use of 3-D as a production and promotional tool for blockbuster films, rather than as a mere niche or novelty experiment. “This is why all these 3-D venues were built,” he said. “This is the one. The behemoth… The holy grail of 3-D has finally arrived .”
Those who embrace 3-D note that it spices up a trip to the cinema by adding a more active “embodied” layer of experience instead of the viewer passively receiving the film through eyes and cars only. A blogger on Animation Ideas writes, “…when 3-D is done well, like in the flying scenes in Up, How to Train Your Dragon, and Avatar, there is an added feeling of vertigo. If you have any fear of heights, the 3-D adds to this element…” Kevin Carr argues that the backlash against 3-D is similar to that which occurred against CGI several years ago, and points out that CGI is now widely regarded as part of the film-maker’s artistic toolkit. He also notes that new technology is frequently seen to be a “gimmick” in its early days, pointing out that many commentators slapped the first “talkie” films of the early 1920s with this same label.
But not everyone greets the rise of 3-D with open arms. Some ophthalmologists point out that 3-D can have unsettling physical effects for many viewers. Dr. Michael Rosenberg, a professor at Northwestern University, has pointed out that many people go through life with minor eye disturbances – a slight muscular imbalance, for example – that does not interrupt day-to-day activities. In the experience of a 3-D movie, however, this problem can be exacerbated through the viewer trying to concentrate on unusual visual phenomena. Dr. Deborah Friedman, from the University of Rochester Medical Center, notes that the perception of depth conjured through three dimensions are not complement the angles from which we take in the world. Eyestrains, headaches and nausea are, therefore, a problem for around 15% of a 3-D film audience.
Film critic Roger Ebert warns that 3-D is detrimental to good film-making. Firstly, he argues, the technology is simply unnecessary; 2~D movies are “already” 3-D, as far as our minds are concerned. Adding die extra dimension with technology, instead of letting our minds do the work, can actually be counter- purposeful and make the overall effect seem clumsy and contrived. Ebert also points out dial the special glasses dim the effect by soaking up light from the screen, making 3-D films a slightly duller experience than they might otherwise be. Finally, Ebert suggests that 3-D encourages film-makers to undercut drama and narrative in favour of simply piling on more gimmicks and special effects. “ Hollywood is racing headlong toward the kiddie market,” he says, pointing to Disney’s announcement that it will no longer make traditional films in favour of animation, franchises, and superheroes.
Whether or not 3-D becomes a powerful force for the film-maker’s vision and the film-going experience, or goes down in history as an over-hyped, expensive novelty, the technology certainly shows no signs of fading in the popularity stakes at the moment. Clash of the Titans, Alice in Wonderland, and How to Train Your Dragon have all recently benefited at the box office due to the added sales that 3-D provides, and with Avatar’s record set to last some time as a total of 3-D’s commercial possibilities, studios are not prepared to back down.

Section 2

Questions 1-6:

Reading Passage has six sections, A-F.
Choose the correct headings for sections A-F from the list of headings below.
Write the correct number i-x in boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet
List of Headings

Construction of special cinemas for 3-D
Good returns forecast for immediate future
The greatest 3-D film of all time
End of traditional movies for children
Early developments
New technology diminishes the art
The golden age of movies
In defence of 3-D
3-D is here to stay
Undesirable visual effects

1) Section A
2) Section B
3) Section C
4) Section D
5) Section E
6) Section F

(Guide: Candidates need to match the list of headings with the correct statements)

Question 1:

Answer: V

Supporting Sentence: In the theatre of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles, on the evening of 27 September 1922, a new form of film-making made its commercial debut: 3-D1.

Keyword: Ambassador Hotel, 27 September 1922, 3-D1

Keyword Location: Paragraph A, lines 1-6

Explanation: The first six lines of paragraph A implies that the evening of September 27, 1922, saw the commercial debut of 3-D filmmaking in the theatre of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. The Power of Love was subsequently exhibited to press and exhibitors in New York City, but it was not picked up for distribution and is currently thought to be lost. Pioneers of 3-D experimented quietly over the course of the next three decades as they adapted to new technologies and slowly enhanced the viewing experience.

Question 2:

Answer: III

Supporting Sentence: Released worldwide in December 2009, die fantasy film Avatar quickly became the highest-grossing film ever made, knocking Titanic from the top slot.

Keyword: worldwide, Avatar, highest-grossing film

Keyword Location: Paragraph B, Lines 1-4

Explanation: The first four lines of paragraph B suggests that Avatar, a fantasy movie that was released in all of its glory in December 2009, swiftly overtook Titanic as the highest-grossing movie ever created. The movie Avatar, which is set in the year 2154 on a planet in another solar system, went on to become the only one to gross US$2 billion worldwide and is now closing in on $3 billion.

Question 3:

Answer: VIII

Supporting Sentence: Kevin Carr argues that the backlash against 3-D is similar to that which occurred against CGI2 several years ago, and points out that CGI is now widely regarded as part of the film-maker’s artistic toolkit.

Keyword: argues, 3-D, artistic toolkit

Keyword Location: Paragraph C, Lines 5-9

Explanation: The fifth to ninth lines of paragraph C depicts that in his defence, Kevin Carr notes that CGI is now universally acknowledged as a component of the artistic arsenal of filmmakers and compares the backlash against 3-D to that which occurred against CGI2 a few years ago.

Question 4:

Answer: X

Supporting Sentence: Some ophthalmologists point out that 3-D can have unsettling physical effects for many viewers.

Keyword: ophthalmologists, 3-D, physical effects

Keyword Location: Paragraph D, Lines 1-4

Explanation: Lines 1-4 of paragraph D portrays that the physical impacts of 3-D for many viewers can be disconcerting, according to some ophthalmologists. Professor at Northwestern University Dr. Michael Rosenberg has noted that many people live with modest eye abnormalities, such as a little muscle imbalance, that do not interfere with daily tasks. However, in a 3-D movie experience, this issue might be made worse by the spectator trying to focus on strange visual phenomena.

Question 5:

Answer: VI

Supporting Sentence: Adding die extra dimension with technology, instead of letting our minds do the work, can actually be counter- purposeful and make the overall effect seem clumsy and contrived.

Keyword: dimension, technology, clumsy, contrived

Keyword Location: Paragraph E, Lines 1-3

Explanation:The first three lines of paragraph E implies that instead of letting our minds do the work, using technology to add an extra dimension might be counterproductive and make the total effect seem awkward and artificial.

Question 6:

Answer: II

Supporting Sentence: Whether or not 3-D becomes a powerful force for the film-maker’s vision and the film-going experience, or goes down in history as an over-hyped, expensive novelty, the technology certainly shows no signs of fading in the popularity stakes at the moment.

Keyword: film-maker’s vision, over-hyped, stakes at the moment

Keyword Location: Paragraph F, Lines 1-3

Explanation: Lines 1-3 of paragraph F suggests that whether or not 3-D transforms into a significant force for the filmmaker's vision and the movie-going experience, or goes down in history as an over-hyped, pricey novelty, the technology now shows no symptoms of losing its appeal.

Questions 7-13:

Look at the following statements (Questions 7-13) and the list of people below.
Match each statement with the correct person, A-G. Write the correct letter, A-G, in boxes 20-26 on your answer sheet.

NB. You may use any letter more than once.
NB. Some options may not be used.

7) 3-D conflicts with our mental construct of our surroundings.
8) 3-D encourages an over-emphasis on quick visual thrills.
9) Effective use of 3-D technology may increase our sensation of elevation.
10) 3-D viewing can worsen an existing visual disorder.
11) Avatar is the most powerful example of 3-D yet to arrive in cinemas.
12) Avatar’s strength is found in its visual splendor, not in aspects of story.
13) People already have the mental capacity to see ordinary movies in three dimensions.

List of people

Kenneth Turan
Exhibition Relations’ analyst
Animation Ideas’ blogger
Kevin Carr
Dr. Michael Rosenberg
Dr. Deborah Friedman
Roger Elbert

(Guide: Candidates need to answer questions 20 to 26 and answer each of them by selecting the correct person from the list of people )

Question 7:

Answer: F

Supporting Sentence: Dr. Deborah Friedman, from the University of Rochester Medical Center, notes that the perception of depth conjured through three dimensions docs not complement die angles from which we take in the world. Eyestrains, headaches and nausea are, therefore, a problem for around 15% of a 3-D film audience.

Keyword: 3-D, Conflicts, mental construct, surroundings.

Keyword Location: Paragraph D, Lines 6-9

Explanation: According to Dr. Deborah Friedman of the University of Rochester Medical Center, our impression of depth does not match the angles from which we view the world. Therefore, about 15% of moviegoers who see 3-D films experience eye strain, headaches, and nausea.

Question 8:

Answer: G

Supporting Sentence: Finally, Ebeit suggests that 3-D encourages film-makers to undercut drama and narrative in favour of simply piling on more gimmicks and special effects.

Keyword: 3-D, Encourages, visual, thrills

Keyword Location: Paragraph E, 7-9 Lines.

Explanation: In addition, Roger Elbert contends that 3-D pushes filmmakers to forgo drama and narrative in favour of merely packing on more gimmicks and amazing effects.

Question 9:

Answer: C

Supporting Sentence: A blogger on Animation Ideas writes, “…when 3~D is done well, like in the flying scenes in Up, How to Train Your Dragon, and Avatar, there is an added feeling of vertigo. If you have any fear of heights, the 3-D really adds to this element…”

Keyword: Effective use, 3-D, technology, increase, sensation, elevation

Keyword Location: Paragraph C, 3-5 Lines

Explanation: A blogger with Animation Ideas claims that when 3D is done correctly, like in the flying scenes in Up, How to Train Your Dragon, and Avatar, there is an extra sense of dizziness. If you're afraid of heights in any way, the 3-D dramatically amplifies this element.

Question 10:

Answer: E

Supporting Sentence: Dr. Michael Rosenberg, a professor at Northwestern University, has pointed out that many people go through life with minor eye disturbances – a slight muscular imbalance, for example – that does not interrupt day-to-day activities. In the experience of a 3-D movie, however, this problem can be exacerbated through the viewer trying to concentrate on unusual visual phenomena.

Keyword: 3-D, viewing, worsen, existing, visual, disorder.

Keyword Location: Paragraph D, lines 2-6

Explanation: Many people live with modest eye abnormalities, such as a little muscle imbalance, that do not interfere with daily activities, according to Dr. Michael Rosenberg, a professor at Northwestern University. However, in a 3-D movie experience, this issue might be made worse by the spectator trying to focus on strange visual phenomena.

Question 11:

Answer: B

Supporting Sentence: A film analyst at Exhibitor Relations has agreed, noting that Avatar has cemented die use of 3-D as a production and promotional tool for blockbuster films, rather than as a mere niche or novelty experiment. “This is why all these 3-D venues were built,” he said. “This is the one. The behemoth… The holy grail of 3-D has finally arrived.”

Keyword: Avatar, most powerful, 3-D, cinemas.

Keyword Location: Paragraph B, 8-11 lines

Explanation: Lines 8-11 of paragraph B depicts that the usage of 3-D in production and promotion for big-budget movies, as opposed to just as a niche or novelty venture, has been reinforced by blockbuster movies like Avatar, according to a film analyst at Exhibitor Relations. This is the reason that every 3-D arena was created, he stated. The one is this. The enormous... Finally, the pinnacle of 3-D has been attained.

Question 12:

Answer: A

Supporting Sentence: Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times praised Avatar’s “powerful” visual accomplishments, but suggested the dialogue was “flat” and the characterizations “obvious”.

Keyword: Avatar, strength, visual, splendour, aspects of story.

Keyword Location: Paragraph B, Lines 7 & 8

Explanation: The seventh and eighth lines of paragraph B explains that the speech in Avatar, according to Los Angeles Times critic Kenneth Turan, is "flat," and the characters are "obvious," despite the film's "powerful" visual achievements.

Question 13:

Answer: G

Supporting Sentence: Film critic Roger Ebert warns that 3-D is detrimental to good film-making. Firstly, he argues, the technology is simply unnecessary; 2~D movies are “already” 3-D, as far as our minds are concerned.

Keyword: People, mental capacity, ordinary, movies, three dimensions

Keyword Location: Paragraph E, Lines 1-2

Explanation: The first two lines of paragraph E portrays that film critic Roger Ebert cautions that 3-D is bad for producing quality movies. First of all, he contends, the technology is pointless because, in our thoughts, 2D movies are "already" 3-D.

Read more IELTS Reading Samples