There Should Be Fixed Punishments For Each Crime IELTS Writing Task 2

There Should Be Fixed Punishments For Each Crime IELTS Writing Task 2 has three sample answers provided below. It requires candidates to answer a simple question with argumentative statements. The sample answers have an introduction and body. The introduction provides a brief about the given topic. Body in each sample answer portrays argumentative statements to support the test-taker’s perspectives. IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching- Join Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Model Answer 1

Some people debate whether criminals should always receive a set sentence for a specific act. Or whether the circumstances surrounding the crime must be taken into account before punishing the offender. This essay will look at both sides of the debate, but I lean toward the position that argues punishment should take into account the circumstances of a crime.
In the course of human history, crime has, on the one hand, decreased dramatically over the centuries. Fixed sanctions for such horrific crimes as the death penalty and life in jail for drug trafficking serve as deterrents. Such brutal punishments ensure safety and stability in society because of their severity. For instance, as per a report on criminal justice from the C.I.A., many middle-income nations routinely rank close to the top in a low-crime index. Because of their tough laws that enforce fixed penalties for certain offences. To protect the defenceless and hold the guilty accountable, however, is the basic goal of law and order. The primary goal of civil society frequently conflicts with fixed punishment.
On the other hand, prosecuting a criminal violates human rights, frequently without taking into account the circumstances that led to the act. Take Saudi Arabia, which is the nation with the lowest crime rate in the entire globe. Many human rights organisations have criticised the authorities for using a rigorous fundamentalist approach to prosecuting convicts. Regardless of the circumstances of the crime. According to Amnesty International, even if offenders are wrongfully convicted, they are not entitled to fair trials. Last but not least, in my view, a convicted individual should only receive punishment depending on the specifics and seriousness of the offence. For instance, if someone kills in self-defence, the term should not be a life sentence.
In conclusion, I think that both sides of the debate—those in favour of and those opposed to set penalties—have valid points. However, I believe that punishments should be determined based on the individual circumstances of offenders. It should be based with the intention of deterring future offences.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Articles

Check: IELTS Actual Test ebooks Combo

Model Answer 2

Have you ever considered becoming a judge? In numerous circumstances during our daily lives, it may be necessary to convey our judgments. But when it comes to making decisions about major crimes, is it really that straightforward? The question of whether there should be standardised penalties for all crimes or whether the motivation should be taken into consideration has been up for debate. The latter viewpoint has my own support because many crimes include criminals who aren't actually at fault.
One side of the argument holds that, regardless of the criminal's motivation, the punishment for any offence should be fixed. They contend that if criminals are aware that even small offences carry harsh penalties, they will be deterred and never try to commit a crime. As a result, crime and violence rates significantly drop, which will lead to a better society. For instance, whether the thief took an apple or a Ferrari, in Saudi Arabia the robber will have his hands cut off as punishment.
The opposing group in society contends that while imposing a sentence on a criminal, the context of the crime must be examined as well as the offender's purpose. They use the fact that not all crimes are intentional or that the perpetrator is not always the true offender as justification. Because a robbery committed to feeding a family differs from one committed to making money, the killer in an involuntary homicide may end up being the victim. The judge, in this case, has the authority to select the appropriate punishment after taking into account all relevant circumstances.
Overall, the judicial system should be flexible enough to deal with some offences. And take the circumstances of the crime into account in order to render the most appropriate judgement. Even though fixed sentences can be incredibly helpful in reducing crime rates and may result in a safer society.

Model Answer 3

In today's modern society, we are continuously blasted with news about crime, which has recently risen at an alarming rate. Therefore, some people believe that every crime should have a specific punishment that is enacted by the government. Yet, a number of people opine that while deciding the punishment, one should take into account the situations that led the perpetrators to commit their crimes. We shall therefore consider both sides of the issue before drawing a valid decision.
For a number of reasons, each sort of crime requires a certain punishment. It first enables all criminals to get equal treatment for all crimes. Ensuring no one will experience discrimination or offence by the general population is crucial. Additionally, there won't be any inconsistencies in the prison terms of criminals who committed the same type of crime. Furthermore, a set penalty is essential for serving as a deterrent and turning potential offenders. For instance, the prospect of receiving severe punishment for crimes like murder will undoubtedly dissuade potential criminals. And cause them to reconsider committing a crime.
On the other hand, it's important to consider the motives behind criminal behaviour. The first is that many of them, especially teenagers who are more susceptible to those feelings of loneliness, are more easily swayed by their friends. They lack mature thought and are unaware of the potential consequences of committing crimes. Research from Columbia has revealed that when a misbehaving friend is discovered committing a crime, 58 per cent of young people are negatively impacted. The general public also feels that many offenders lack parental love, which eventually leads to their violent and aggressive behaviour. Therefore, in order to demonstrate their strength, they engage in criminal activity such as robberies and murders.
In conclusion, I believe that every jury should analyse the motives behind criminal behaviour when deciding what consequences to impose. Once the crime rates are properly decreased, our country will undoubtedly continue to progress and thrive in the years to come.