The Secrets of Persuasion Reading Answers

The Secrets of Persuasion Reading Answers is a topic discussing about the science of persuasion. “E-ENG-school IELTS Reading Test With Answers Key (New Edition)” is the book from which the given IELTS topic has been taken. There are 13 questions in total in the topic named The Secrets of Persuasion Reading Answers, which should be answered within the time span of 20 minutes by the candidates. This particular topic comes with three different sorts of questions, like, choose the correct letter, True/False/Not Given, and match the category. The candidates should read thoroughly the IELTS reading passage in order to recognize the synonyms and identify the keywords and for answering the questions below. Similar kinds of topics like The Secrets of Persuasion Reading Answers are included in the IELTS reading practice papers, which the candidates can take into their consideration for performing a good score in this section.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check:
Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1

Read the Passage to Answer the Following Questions

The Secrets of Persuasion Reading Answers

  1. Our mother may have told you the secret to getting what you ask for was to say please. The reality is rather more surprising. Adam Dudding talks to a psychologist who has made a life’s work from the science of persuasion. Some scientists peer at things through high-powered microscopes. Others goad rats through mazes or mix bubbling fluids in glass beakers. Robert Cialdini, for his part, does curious things with towels and believes that by doing so he is discovering important insights into how society works.
  2. Cialdini’s towel experiments (more of them later), are part of his research into how we persuade others to say yes. He wants to know why some people have a knack for bending the will of others, be it a telephone cold-caller talking to you about timeshares, or a parent whose children are compliant even without threats of extreme violence. While he’s anxious not to be seen as the man who’s written the bible for snake-oil salesmen, for decades the Arizona State University social psychology professor has been creating systems for the principles and methods of persuasion and writing bestsellers about them. Some people seem to be born with the skills; Cialdini’s claim is that by applying a little science, even those of us who aren’t should be able to get our own way more often. “All my life I’ve been an easy mark for the blandishment of salespeople and fundraisers and I’d always wondered why they could get me to buy things I didn’t want and give to causes I hadn’t heard of,” says Cialdini on the phone from London, where his is plugging his latest book.
  3. He found that laboratory experiments on the psychology of persuasion were telling only part of the story, so he began to research influence in the real world, enrolling in sales-training programmes: “I learnt how to sell automobiles from a lot, how to sell insurance from an office, how to sell encyclopedias door to door.” He concluded there were six general “principles of influence” and has since put them to the test under slightly more scientific conditions. Most recently, that has meant messing about with towels. Many hotels leave a little card in each bathroom asking guests to reuse towels and thus conserve water and electricity and reduce pollution. Cialdini and his colleagues wanted to test the relative effectiveness of different words on those cards. Would guests be motivated to co-operate simply because it would help save the planet, or were other factors more compelling? To test this, the researchers changed the card’s message from an environmental one to the simple (and truthful) statement that the majority of guests at the hotel had reused their towel at least once. Guests given this message were 26% more likely to reuse their towels than those given the old message. In Cialdini’s book “Yes! 50 Secrets from the Science of Persuasion”, co-written with another social scientist and a business consultant, he explains that guests were responding to the persuasive force of “social proof”, the idea that our decisions are strongly influenced by what we believe other people like us are doing.
  4. So much for towels. Cialdini has also learnt a lot from confectionery. Yes! Cites the work of New Jersey behavioral scientist David Strohmetz, who wanted to see how restaurant patrons would respond to ridiculously small favors from their food server, in the form of after-dinner chocolate for each diner. The secret, it seems, is in how you give the chocolate. When the chocolates arrived in a heap with the bill, tips went up a miserly 3% compared to when no chocolate was given. But when the chocolates were dropped individually in front of each diner, tips went up 14%. The scientific breakthrough, though, came when the waitress gave each diner one chocolate, headed away from the table then doubled back to give them one more each as if such generosity had only just occurred to her. Tips went up 23%. This is “reciprocity” in action: we want to return favors done to us, often without bothering to calculate the relative value of what is being received and given.
  5. Geeling Ng, operations manager at Auckland’s Soul Bar, says she’s never heard of Kiwi waiting staff using such a cynical trick, not least because New Zealand tipping culture is so different from that of the US: “If you did that in New Zealand, as diners were leaving they’d say ‘can we have some more?” ‘ But she certainly understands the general principle of reciprocity. The way to a diner’s heart is “to give them something they’re not expecting in the way of service. It might be something as small as leaving a mint on their plate, or it might be remembering that last time they were in they wanted their water with no ice and no lemon. “In America, it would translate into an instant tip. In New Zealand, it translates into a huge smile and thanks to you.” And no doubt, return visits.

THE FIVE PRINCIPLES OF PERSUASION

  1. Reciprocity: People want to give back to those who have given to them. The trick here is to get in first. That’s why charities put a crummy pen inside a mailout, and why smiling women in supermarkets hand out dollops of free food. Scarcity: People want more of things they can have less of. Advertisers ruthlessly exploit scarcity (“limit four per customer”, “sale must end soon”), and Cialdini suggests parents do too: “Kids want things that are less available, so say ‘this is an unusual opportunity; you can only have this for a certain time’.”
  2. Authority: We trust people who know what they’re talking about. So inform people honestly of your credentials before you set out to influence them. “You’d be surprised how many people fail to do that,” says Cialdini. “They feel it’s impolite to talk about their expertise.” In one study, therapists whose patients wouldn’t do their exercises were advised to display their qualification certificates prominently. They did and experienced an immediate leap in patient compliance.
  3. Commitment/consistency: We want to act in a way that is consistent with the commitments we have already made. Exploit this to get a higher sign-up rate when soliciting charitable donations. First, ask workmates if they think they will sponsor you on your egg-and-spoon marathon. Later, return with the sponsorship form to those who said yes and remind them of their earlier commitment.
  4. Linking: We say yes more often to people we like. Obvious enough, but reasons for “linking” can be weird. In one study, people were sent survey forms and asked to return them to a named researcher. When the researcher gave a fake name resembling that of the subject (eg, Cynthia Johnson is sent a survey by “Cindy Johansen”), surveys were twice as likely to be completed. We favor people who resemble us, even if the resemblance is as minor as the sound of their name.
  5. Social proof: We decide what to do by looking around to see what others just like us are doing. Useful for parents, says Cialdini. “Find groups of children who are behaving in a way that you would like your child to, because the child looks to the side, rather than at you.” More perniciously, social proof is the force underpinning the competitive materialism of “keeping up with the Joneses”

Section 2

Solution and Explanation
Question 28-31
Choose the correct letter A,B,C,D

Question 28: The main purpose of Cialdini’s research of writing is to

  1. Explain the reason why the researcher should investigate in person
  2. Explore the secret that why some people become the famous salesperson
  3. Help people to sell the product
  4. Prove that maybe there is a science in the psychology of persuasion.

Answer: D
Supporting Sentence
:
“Cialdini’s towel experiments (more of them later), are part of his research into how we persuade others to say yes. ”
Keywords
:
 persuade
Keyword Location
:
para B line 1
Explanation
:
 As stated in the first line of paragraph B, Cialdini studied how we convince others to agree as part of his towel experiments, which will be discussed in more detail later.

Question 29: Which of the statements is correct according to Cialdini’s research methodology.

  1. He checked data in a lot of the latest book
  2. He conducted these experiments in the laboratory
  3. He interviewed and contract with many salespeople
  4. He made a lot of phone calls collecting what he wanted to know.

Answer: C
Supporting Sentence
:
“He wants to know why some people have a knack for bending the will of others, be it a telephone cold-caller talking to you about timeshares, or a parent whose children are compliant even without threats of extreme violence. ”
Keywords
:
telephoned, talked
Keyword Location
Para B, line 3
Explanation
:
 As per line 3 of paragraph B, Robert Cialdini is curious as to why certain people are so adept at swaying other people's opinions, whether it be a cold caller on the phone pitching you a timeshare or a parent whose kids are obedient even in the absence of severe threats of harm.

Question 30: Which of the following is correct according to the towel experiment in the passage.

  1. Different hotel guests act in a different response.
  2. Most guests act by the idea of environmental preservation.
  3. More customers tend to cooperate as the message required than simply act environmentally.
  4. People tend to follow the hotel’s original message more

Answer: C
Supporting Sentence
:
 To test this, the researchers changed the card’s message from an environmental one to the simple (and truthful) statement that the majority of guests at the hotel had reused their towel at least once.
Keywords
:
from an environmental one to the simple (and truthful) statement
Keyword Location
:
Para C, line 10
Explanation
Line 10 of paragraph C states that the content on the card was originally intended to be environmentally friendly, but the researchers revised it to simply reflect that most hotel customers had reused their towels at least once. This message's recipients were 26% more likely to reuse their towels than those who received the previous one.

Question 31: Which of the following is correct according to the candy shop [experiment in the passage]?

  1. Presenting way affects diner’s tips
  2. Regular customer gives tips more than irregulars
  3. People give tips only when offered chocolates
  4. Chocolate with bill got higher tips

AnswerA
Supporting Sentence
But when the chocolates were dropped individually in front of each diner, tips went up 14%. 
Keywords
heap with the bill, dropped individually, the waitress gave each
Keyword Location
Para D, line 6
Explanation
:
 The sixth line of paragraph D enhances that tips increased meagerly 3% when the chocolates were delivered with the bill as opposed to no chocolate. However, tips increased by 14% when the chocolates were placed one in front of each customer. The scientific discovery, however, occurred when the waitress gave each diner one chocolate, walked away from the table, then turned around and gave them each another, as if the idea of being so generous had just occurred to her.

Question 32-35
Does the following statement agree with the information given in reading passage?
In boxes 32-35 on your answer sheet write

TRUE if the statement is true
FALSE if the statement is false
NOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage

Question 32: Robert Cialdini experienced principles of influence himself in real life.

Answer: TRUE
Supporting Sentence
:
“All my life I’ve been an easy mark for the blandishment of salespeople and fundraisers and I’d always wondered why they could get me to buy things I didn’t want and give to causes I hadn’t heard of,” says Cialdini on the phone from London, where he is plugging his latest book.”
Keywords
Cialdini
Keyword Location
:
Para B, last line
Explanation
:
 The last line of paragraph B explains that when Cialdini calls from London, where he is promoting his most recent book, he says, "I've been an easy target for the blandishment of marketers and fundraisers my entire life and I've always wondered how they could get me to buy goods I didn't want and give to causes I hadn't heard of. So, the statement is TRUE. 

Question 33: The principle of persecution has different types in different countries.

Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation: No available information to support this sentence has been given in the passage.

Question 34: In New Zealand, people tend to give tips to attendants after being served chocolate

Answer: FALSE
Supporting Sentence
:
“If you did that in New Zealand, as diners were leaving they’d say ‘can we have some more?”
Keywords
:
they’d say ‘can we have some more?”
Keyword Location
Para E, line 4
Explanation
The fourth line of paragraph E states that the operations manager at Auckland's Soul Bar, Geeling Ng, claims she has never heard of Kiwi wait staff utilising such a cynical ruse, in part because New Zealand tipping culture is so dissimilar from that of the US. Tipping in New Zealand is equivalent to a huge smile and a heartfelt thank you. Moreover, future visits. Hence, it is a FALSE statement.

Question 35: The elder generation of New Zealand is easily attracted by extra service of restaurants by the principle of reciprocity.

Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation
No available information to justify this answer is provided in the passage.

Question 36-40
Use this information in the passage to match the category (listed A-E) with the correct description below.
Write the appropriate letter A-E in boxes 36-40 on the answer sheet.
NB: You may use any letter more than once.

  1. Reciprocity of Scarcity
  2. Authority
  3. Previous Commitment
  4. Linking
  5. Social Proof

Question 36: Some experts may reveal qualifications in front of clients

Answer: B
Supporting Sentence
:
“So inform people honestly of your credentials before you set out to influence them.”
Keywords
:
credentials
Keyword Location
:
Para G, line 2
Explanation
:
 The second line of paragraph G suggests that according to the idea of authority, we put our trust in those we know. It is crucial to tell people of one's credentials before attempting to influence them.

Question 37: Parents tend to say something that other kids are doing the same.

Answer: E
Supporting Sentence
:
“Find groups of children who are behaving in a way that you would like your child to, because the child looks to the side, rather than at you”
Keywords
:
group of children, behaving in a way that you would like,
Keyword Location
:
Para J, line 3
Explanation
:
According to the principle of Social Proof, parents always tend to tell their child to look up to some other children who are doing the activities that the parent wants their child to do.

Question 38: Advertisers ruthlessly exploit the limitation of chances.

AnswerA
Supporting Sentence
:
“Advertisers ruthlessly exploit scarcity (“limit four per customer”, “sale must end soon”), and Cialdini suggests parents do too: ”
Keywords
:
limitation
Keyword Location
:
Para F, line 4
Explanation
The fourth line of paragraph F explains that the reciprocity of scarcity principle states that if an advertisement states that a product is limited to four per customer or that a sale is about to end, more people will purchase it since they like to purchase more rare goods.

Question 39: Use a familiar name in a survey.

Answer: D
Supporting Sentence
:
“When the researcher gave a fake name resembling that of the subject (eg, Cynthia Johnson is sent a survey by “Cindy Johansen”), surveys were twice as likely to be completed.”
Keywords
:
fake name resembling the subject
Keyword Location
Para I, line 4
Explanation
:
 The fourth line of paragraph I implies that according to the concept of liking, more answers should be anticipated when the subject is given a fictitious name that sounds similar to the real name; in this case, the subject is given the name Cynthia Johnson rather than Cindy Johansen.

Question 40: Ask colleagues to offer a helping hand.

Answer: C
Supporting Sentence
:
 “Exploit this to get a higher sign-up rate when soliciting charitable donations. First, ask workmates if they think they will sponsor you on your egg-and-spoon marathon. Later, return with the sponsorship form to those who said yes and remind them of their earlier commitment”
Keywords
:
workmates
Keyword Location
:
 Para H, line 3
Explanation
:
 The third line of paragraph H explains that Colleagues can be taken advantage of in accordance with the commitment concept. Asking the coworkers if they would be willing to sponsor you for the egg and spoon marathon first, and then go back to them with the scholarship application to confirm their commitment.

Read more IELTS Reading Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show