The Impact of Environment to Children Reading Answers

Dec 13, 2022

The Impact of Environment to Children Reading Answers has 13 questions that must be answered in 20 minutes. The IELTS topic The Impact of Environment to Children Reading Answers –Choose no more than three words from the Reading Passage for each answer., True/False/Not Given and choose the correct option. Candidates must skim the paragraph for keywords, comprehend the topic, and say if the given assertion is true, false, or not given in True/False/Not Given. To answer the question of the other two types, applicants must read the reading passage, identify keywords, and recognize synonyms. They can get more IELTS Reading Tips online to excel in the examination. Candidates can get more such topics from IELTS Reading practice papers.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1

Read the passage to answer the following questions

The Impact of Environment to Children Reading Answers

What determines how a child develops? In reality, it would be impossible to account for each and every influence that ultimately determines who a child becomes. What we can look at are some of the most apparent influences such as genetics, parenting, experiences, friends, family relationships and school to help us understand the influences that help contribute to a child’s growth.
Think of these influences as building blocks. While roost people tend to have the same basic building blocks, these components can be put together in an infinite number of ways. Consider your own overall personality. How much of who you are today was shaped by your genetic inheritance, and how much is a result of your lifetime of experiences? This question has puzzled philosophers, psychologists and educators for hundreds of years and is frequently referred to as the nature versus nurture debate. Generally, the given rate of influence on children is 40 % to 50%. It may refer to all of siblings of a family. Are we the result of nature (our genetic background) or nurture (our environment)? Today, most researchers agree that child development involves a complex interaction of both nature and nurture, while some aspects of development may be strongly influenced by biology, environmental influences may also play a role. For example, the timing of when the onset of puberty occurs is largely the results of heredity, but environmental factors such as nutrition can also have an effect.
The From the earliest moments of life, the interaction of heredity and the environment works to shape who children are and who they will become. While the genetic instructions a child inherits from his parents may set out a road map for development, the environment can impact how these directions are expressed, shaped or event silenced. The complex interaction of nature and nurture does not just occur at certain moments or at certain periods of time; it is persistent and lifelong.
The shared environment (also called common environment) refers to environmental influences that have the effect of making siblings more similar to one another. Shared environmental influences can include shared family experiences, shared peer groups, and sharing the same school and community. In general, there has not been strong evidence for shared environmental effects on many behaviors, particularly those measured in adults. Possible reasons for this are discussed. Shared environmental effects are evident in children and adolescents, but these effects generally decrease across the life span. New developments in behavior genetic methods have made it possible to specify shared environments of importance and to tease apart familial and nonfamilial sources of shared environmental influence. It may also refer to all of siblings of a family, but the rate of influence is less than 10 per cent.
The importance of non-shared environment lay hidden within quantitative genetic studies since they began nearly a century ago. Quantitative genetic methods, such as twin and adoption methods, were designed to tease apart nature and nurture in order to explain family resemblance. For nearly all complex phenotypes, it has emerged that the answer to the question of the origins of family resemblance is nature-things run in families primarily for genetic reasons. However, the best available evidence for the importance of environmental influence comes from this same quantitative genetic research because genetic influence never explains all of the variances for complex phenotypes, and the remaining variance must be ascribed to environmental influences. Non-shared environment, it may refer to the part of siblings of a family, the rate of influence to children is 40 % to 50%.
Yet it took many decades for the full meaning of these findings to emerge. If genetics explains why siblings growing up in the same family are similar, but the environment is important, then it must be the case that the salient environmental effects do not make siblings similar. That is, they are not shared by children growing up in the same family-they must be ‘non-shared’. This implication about non-shared environmental import lay fallow in the field of quantitative genetics because the field’s attention was then firmly on the nature-nurture debate. ‘Nurture’ in the nature-nurture debate was implicitly taken to mean shared environment because, from Freud onwards, theories of socialization had assumed that children’s environments are doled out on a family-by-family basis. In contrast, the point of the non-shared environment is that environments are doled out on a child-by-child basis. Note that the phrase ‘non-shared environment’ is shorthand for a component of phenotypic variance-it refers to ‘effects’ rather than ‘events’, as discussed later. Research in recent years suggested that the impact from parents will be easy to be interrupted by the influence from the children of the same age. That also showed that variations of knowledge that children get from other culture are increasing. A number of interests between, whatever, fathers and mothers or parents and their children are conflicting.
Because siblings living in the same home share some but not all of the potential genetic and environmental factors that influence their behaviors, teasing apart the potential influences of genetic and non-genetic factors that differentiate siblings is very difficult. Turkheimer and Waldron (2000) have noted that non-shared environmental influences——which include all of the random measurement error——may not be systematic, but instead may operate idiosyncratically and in ways that cannot be ascertained. Thus, the question is whether or not quasi-experimental behavioral genetic designs can be used to actually identify systematic non-shared environmental mechanisms cross-sectionally and longitudinally. This is the impetus for the current study

Section 2

Solution and Explanation

Question 1-5:
Complete the table now.
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the Reading Passage for each answer.

Type of Impact to Children Range of Reference to Siblings Rate of Influence

1 _______________________

background from parents and family Including to all of siblings 40%-50%

Shared Environment to 2 __________________ less than 3 __________

4 ___________________ to part of siblings 5 _______________-50%

Question 1:

Answer: Genetic
Supporting Statement: How much of who you are today was shaped by your genetic inheritance, and how much is a result of your lifetime of experiences? Generally, the given rate of influence on children is 40 % to 50%.
Keywords: genetic inheritance, rate of influence, 40% to 50%, siblings
Keyword Location: Paragraph B, Line 3-5
Explanation: The author in lines 3-5 of Paragraph B clearly states that the rate of influence genetics inheritance has on children is 40 % to 50 %. Hence, genetic is the correct answer.

Question 2:

Answer: all of siblings
Supporting Statement: It may also refer to all of siblings of a family, but the rate of influence is less than 10 percent.
Keywords: shared environment, refer, all of siblings
Keyword Location: Paragraph D, Line 4-6
Explanation: Lines 4-6 of Paragraph D state that shared environment also refers to all siblings, which can be traced back to the question. here the rate of influence decrease but it also refers to all of the siblings.

Question 3:

Answer: 10 %
Supporting Statement: It may also refer to all of siblings of a family, but the rate of influence is less than 10 percent.
Keywords: shared environment, refer, all of siblings
Keyword Location: Paragraph D, Line 4-6
Explanation: The author in Paragraph D states that a shared environment also refers to all siblings. In this case, though the rate of influence is less than 10 %. We can backtrack the answer to the question.

Question 4:

Answer: Non-shared environment
Supporting Statement: Non-shared environment, may refer to the part of siblings of a family, the rate of influence to children is 40 % to 50%.
Keywords: non-shared environment, refer, part of sibling
Keyword Location: Paragraph E, line 5
Explanation: The passage states about the non-shared environment. This may refer to the part of a sibling, which can be traced back to the question. Hence non-shared environment is the correct answer.

Question 5:

Answer: 40 %
Supporting Statement: Non-shared environment, it may refer to the part of siblings of a family, the rate of influence to children is 40 % to 50%.
Keywords: non-shared environment, refer, part of sibling
Keyword Location: Paragraph E, line 5
Explanation: It is clearly stated in the passage that a non-shared environment refers to a part sibling and the rate of influence is 40% to 50%. As per the table, 40% should be the correct answer.

Questions 6-8:
Complete the following summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage.
Using NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the Reading Passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 6-8 on your answer sheet.

Research in recent years illuminated that the impact from parents will frequently be 6 _______ . by the peer’s pressure. It was also indicated that 7 _______ of knowledge that children learned from other cultures is increasing. The study has found quantities of competing 8 ______ between parents and children or even between parents themselves.

Question 6:

Answer: Interrupted
Supporting Statement: Research in recent years suggested that the impact from parents will be easy to be interrupted by the influence from the children of the same age.
Keywords: research, impact from parents, interrupted, influence from children
Keyword Location: Paragraph F, Line 8
Explanation: Paragraph F, line 8 says that the impact of parents is easy to be changed or interrupted by the influence of other children of the same age. Children of the same age means that they are their peers. Hence, as per the question, the impact of parents will frequently be interrupted by peer pressure.

Question 7:

Answer: Variations
Supporting Statement: That also showed that variations of knowledge that children get from other culture are increasing.
Keywords: variations, knowledge, children, culture, increasing
Keyword Location: Paragraph F, Line 9
Explanation: Paragraph F, Line 9 says that children get variations of knowledge that they get from each other’s culture. The summary talks about the knowledge that they attain from various cultures. Hence, variations is the correct answer.

Question 8:

Answer: interests
Supporting Statement: A number of interests between, whatever, fathers and mothers or parents and their children are conflicting.
Keywords: number of interests, between, fathers and mothers, conflicting
Keyword Location: Paragraph F, Line 10
Explanation: As per the passage, we can see that there are a number of interests between parents and children. This is including both fathers and mothers. Hence, interests is the correct answer.

Questions 9-12:
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage?
In boxes 9-12 on your answer sheet, write

YES if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

Question 9: The more children there are in a family, the more impact it has on the environment.

Answer: NOT GIVEN
Supporting Statement: The shared environment (also called common environment) refers to environmental influences that have the effect of making siblings more similar to one another.
Keywords: more, effect, environment
Keyword Location: Paragraph D, Line 1
Explanation: As per the supporting statement, we can conclude that a shared environment has the influence of making siblings similar to one another. There is nothing mentioned about more children having an effect on the environment. Hence, it is not Given in the paragraph.

Question 10: Methods based on twin studies still meet unexpected differences that cannot be ascribed to be a purely genetic explanation.

Answer: YES
Supporting Statement: Quantitative genetic methods, such as twin and adoption methods, were designed to tease apart nature and nurture in order to explain family resemblance.
Keywords: twin, tease apart, nature and nurture, family resemblance
Keyword Location: Paragraph E, Line 2-4
Explanation: Paragraph E, Line 2-4 says that genetic methods like twin methods, get unexpected results which cannot be purely based on genetics. The best evidence comes from the same quantitative genetic research because genetic influence never explains all of the variances for complex phenotypes.

Question 11: Children prefer to speak the language from the children of the same age to the language spoken by their parents.

Answer: NOT GIVEN
Supporting Statement: Research in recent years suggests that the impact from parents will be easily interrupted by the influence from the children of the same age.
Keywords: parents, influence
Keyword Location: Paragraph F, 3rd last line
Explanation: The statement says that the children will have an impact from parents and will be influenced by children of the same age. However, this is not mentioned about the language they speak. Hence, the answer is Not Given.

Question 12: The Study of non-shared environment influence can be a generally agreed idea among researchers in the field.

Answer: NO
Supporting Statement: Turkheimer and Waldron (2000) have noted that non-shared environmental influences——which include all of the random measurement error——may not be systematic, but instead may operate idiosyncratically and in ways that cannot be ascertained.
Keywords: noted, non-shared, environmental influences,systematic, ascertained
Keyword Location: Paragraph G,Line 3-5
Explanation: Paragraph G,Line 3-5 says that non-shared environmental influences may not be systematic and cannot be ascertained. This also shows that it is GENERALLY an idea which can be agreed upon.

Question 13:
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C, or D.
Write your answers in box 13 on your answer sheet
According to this passage, which comment is TRUE about the current Study of non-shared environment influence on children?

a little biased in nature
not sufficiently proved
very systematic
can be workable

Answer: B
Supporting Statement: Turkheimer and Waldron (2000) have noted that non-shared environmental influences——which include all of the random measurement error——may not be systematic, but instead may operate idiosyncratically and in ways that cannot be ascertained.
Keywords: noted, non-shared, environmental influences,systematic, ascertained
Keyword location: Paragraph G,Line 3-5
Explanation: Paragraph G,Line 3-5 says that non-shared environmental influences may not be systematic and cannot be ascertained which shows that it is not sufficiently proved

Read More IELTS Reading Samples