The Government Should Make A Better Network For Public Transport IELTS Writing Task 2

Sayantani Barman

Sep 20, 2022

The Government Should Make A Better Network For Public Transport IELTS Writing Task 2 consists of three sample answers provided below. The task requires the candidates to provide a tentative and argumentative answer for the question. The sample answers comprises two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description about the topic. The body contains argumentative statements and tentative answers to support the test-taker's perspective.

IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check:
Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Cities are now expanding; should the government make a better network for public transport or should they build more roads to facilitate car ownership? To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Band 6.5 IELTS Essay

People are currently discussing the relationship between public and private transit systems in the modern day. While some people think that the government should prioritize improving public transportation's connectivity. Rather than giving precedence to facilitating private highways, the opposing school of thinking disagrees. I fully believe that the government should pay attention to the infrastructure for public transportation.

The expansion of public transportation infrastructure like the metro train and bus has many benefits. First of all, it will aid cities and nations in lessening traffic congestion issues that arise during working hours. Second, because it will drastically reduce fuel use, it is also a green strategy. Additionally, by using public transportation more frequently, one might save a significant sum of money by reducing their monthly travel expenses.

However, building roads solely for individual car owners won't yield much benefit until those resources can be used by the city's transportation department. In actuality, the expansion of such highways and roads will increase toll charges. And other costs for owners of cars and trucks. In addition, the municipality must maintain such roads and highways by awarding hugely expensive contracts to the maintenance providers. An express motorway that runs for around 100 miles between two cities would be a prime example and would cost a fortune to maintain over the years. So, the city's traffic jams get better. However, I must also accept the presence of private automobiles. Road expansion would reduce traffic, but harmful gas emissions from vehicles contribute to global warming. Which has led to an increase in pollution over the previous few decades. As a result of the government using mass transit like the metro and buses to limit the number of vehicles on the road. There is no longer any traffic congestion. For instance, Australia boasts the most extensive network of metro trains. And buses in the world, and these vehicles not only offer their citizens real-time service at all stops but also Internet access.

Finally, I want to draw the conclusion that, as I've already stated, improving public transportation is better for the environment overall.

Band 8 IELTS Essay

It is becoming more widely accepted that one of the main problems the government is now dealing with is the traffic situation. While some individuals think that expanding the road system will solve the problem. Others argue that what the government should focus on is promoting public transportation. In my opinion, improving the public transportation system will be more advantageous with regard to this issue. Some contend that enhancing transportation infrastructure is the best way to address this problem. Others contend that the government must build more roads to handle the growing number of private vehicles. I believe that both strategies are required to deal with the traffic problems that beset big cities.

Unquestionably, enhancing public transit is the best way to make cities more livable. If trains and buses are reliable and connect the entire city, few people will want to drive their own automobiles.

People who stress the necessity of more motorways in cities are mainly concerned with reducing urban congestion. However, there is no merit to this defense. This is due to the fact that most people reside in a suburb close to where they work. Therefore, congestion is a problem in urban regions rather than rural ones where freeways may be involved.

Evidently, it makes sense for me to think that public transportation offers more advantages. First off, it lessens traffic congestion and pollution. There will be fewer automobiles on the road as more people choose to take the train, tram, or bus instead of driving. Additionally, it uses less land than road infrastructure does. Additionally, using public transportation to get to work promotes a sense of community. For instance, those who travel in groups are more likely to have a sense of belonging than those who drive alone. This means that accessible transportation is offered by public transportation for all users, irrespective of their demographics.

In a nutshell, even though this contentious issue consistently grabs the public's attention. We may fairly draw the conclusion that governments should invest money in expanding public transportation systems rather than expanding their road network.

Band 9 IELTS Essay

People are moving to cities in greater numbers in quest of better lifestyle options and employment prospects. Unfortunately, there are a lot of issues brought on by urban growth. One of them is a traffic jam. Some claim that the best solution to this issue is to improve transportation infrastructure. Others maintain that more roads need to be constructed by the government to accommodate the increasing number of private vehicles. Both approaches, in my opinion, are necessary to address the traffic issues that plague big cities.

Unquestionably, the most effective approach to make cities more livable is to improve public transportation. Few individuals will want to drive their own cars if trains and buses are reliable and connect the entire city. As a result, there will be fewer private vehicles on the road. There won't be any traffic bottlenecks when there are less vehicles on the road. Another benefit of fewer cars on the road is that air quality will inevitably get better. Nearly everyone who lives in a city experiences respiratory issues brought on by air pollution. And a dependable public transportation system will make it easier for everyone to breathe.

The government is able to minimize the number of vehicles on the road by using mass transit like the metro and buses. And as a result, the streets are no longer congested. For instance, Australia has the most metro trains. And buses in the entire globe that not only offer real-time service to their citizens at each and every stop. But also provide Internet access in public transportation.

It's crucial to expand the infrastructure and build new highways. More roads improve connection and, in most situations. They also shorten the distance separating two urban areas, hence reducing travel time. The fact that constructing additional roads would result in fewer accidents and more lives saved is another benefit.

In conclusion, increasing the frequency and dependability of public transportation is unquestionably. One strategy to address the traffic problems that metropolises have. Adding new roadways is another action that should be taken.

Check- IELTS Writing Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show