The First Man To Walk On The Moon Said It Was A Giant Leap For Mankind IELTS Writing Task 2

The First Man To Walk On The Moon Said It Was A Giant Leap For Mankind IELTS Writing Task 2 has three sample answers provided below. It requires candidates to answer a simple question with argumentative statements. The sample answers have an introduction and body. The introduction provides a brief about the given topic. The body in each sample answer portrays argumentative statements to support the test-taker’s perspectives.
IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching- Join Free Trial Class Now

Topic: The first man to walk on the moon said it was “a giant leap for mankind”. However, some people think it has made little difference to our daily lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Model Answer 1

Unquestionably, in the last few decades, space exploration has revolutionised our world. Since Neil Armstrong first set foot on the moon, humanity's lifestyles have undergone a significant transformation. In my opinion, the advantages that humans can derive from this part may outweigh the minor disadvantages.
On the one hand, spending money on space missions is not as critical as other issues facing people today. The first is providing food for the underprivileged. Many affluent nations consider investing billions of dollars in this area each year. Additionally, international organisations ought to devote more attention to refugees rather than concentrating on the space mission. In the Middle East, thousands of people are forced to flee their homes every year. As a result, solving more pressing problems than sending a man to the moon should be humanity's top priority.
On the other hand, I believe that the advantages of space travel may be much greater than any minor disadvantages. It has inspired other technologies to advance further, which is the initial explanation for it. Passengers might not have arrived at their destination as quickly if scientists had not utilised space navigation systems in aircraft. For instance, modern planes' bodies are made of materials that were used in the shuttle, which increases their speed and reduces the amount of fuel they need.
Additionally, it will aid in the search for a new home planet for humans. As we cannot tell how long our planet will live, scientists will benefit from learning more about space and other planets. Especially as they search for alternatives to Earth. To learn more about Mars' environment and potential options for human habitation in the future, NASA scientists recently decided to send a few volunteers there. Without a well-thought-out plan, the safety of future generations may be more at risk from unforeseen natural disasters that devastate our planet.
In conclusion, even though space exploration may be pointless in comparison to other significant issues that countries face. Its advantages should not be overlooked. I think it has helped people live in a more contemporary society, and this advancement may have helped people find a safer planet.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Articles

Check: IELTS Actual Test ebooks Combo

Model Answer 2

Since Neil Armstrong's first moonwalk, the globe has witnessed notable advancements and discoveries in a variety of sectors. As time goes on, people have a tendency to forget about revolutions and let their daily concerns overshadow the greater picture of their lives. I agree with the statement and this essay will clarify the reasons why landing on the moon did not bring a significant advancement for the average individual.
First off, ardent proponents of space exploration think that this accomplishment was a significant turning point for the field. And it has created new opportunities for studying life on other planets and satellites. Despite the fact that this is a significant achievement in space research, it has had no negative or positive effects on people's daily lives. This explains why people don't seem to care too much. For instance, people might be more interested in signing up for a visit to Mars than learning about its topology. Humans are much more entranced by personal experiences than by reading about them. This further explains the discrepancy between astronomers' claims and the real changes that occur in people's lives.
Adding to this, it should be noted that despite the passage of a few decades since this trip, no ground-breaking findings have been made. With technological breakthroughs, the focus has switched from studying the moon to demystifying other solar system objects farther from the moon. To travel closer to the sun and mercury, for example, recent space missions have focused on employing robotics in orbit. Because humans cannot survive such climatic extremes. This shows that stepping foot on the moon was a very important milestone for the first man to do so. But its value has declined in the eyes of the general public and the greater space community.
To sum up, I restate the aforementioned tenet that the general public will value any innovation if they can personally experience it or profit from it. Although the march on the moon represents a significant victory for astronomers and the space community, its benefits are neither obvious nor universal.

Model Answer 3

Many times I am reminded of the debates around the huge budget that was given and spent on space research in numerous nations worldwide. The debate is on whether the funds should be used for astronomical research or to address current, urgent issues that cannot wait to be addressed. I vehemently agree with the latter viewpoint, and I'll explain why below with some supporting arguments.
First and foremost, global warming is the most frightening issue we face today and requires immediate action to be stopped. In order to accomplish this, the government must also budget money for green product research, development, and distribution. Second, it is asserted that consumable water won't endure for the next 50 years if it isn't adequately recycled and reused. Indeed, this is a serious issue that necessitates the creation of technologies for the wise use and recycling of water. Clearly, finding solutions to these pressing problems and assigning funds to them are priorities if we are to remain on the planet.
Local issues exist in addition to the aforementioned global issues. The inability of a sizable portion of the populace to receive basic essential services is one of the basic problems in practically all developing countries. Additionally, significant investment is needed to guarantee that people have jobs and that appropriate opportunities are offered to them. For instance, 78 percent of people in India are unable to earn a living. Especially due to a lack of education and the intense rivalry that results from the few available work prospects.
In closing, I would restate my belief that the world is currently dealing with a number of serious crises that have a direct bearing on us, as people. In fact, resolving these issues takes precedence over the notion of satiating our interest in space.