The Evolution of Language Reading Answer

The Evolution of Language Reading Answer comprises of 13 sets of questions which the candidates needs to attempt within the given time of 20 minutes. A variety of subjects, including science, technology, the arts, and the humanities has been included in the IELTS reading passages. The sections in the IELTS reading sample article on The Evolution Of Language include the correct answers and justifications. There are three different sorts of questions provided in the passage, like, match the headings, Yes/No/Not Given and Summary completion. A neat study and crystal undestanding of the passage is necessary for the candidates to answer the given questions. 

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers

Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Reading Passage Questions

  1. Language everywhere changes over time; it has to. A central reason that necessitates modification is to allow for developments in our world to be expressed. For example, the technological revolution alone has been responsible for the addition of a plethora of words to our vocabulary: hard drive, software, modem to name just a few. The Japanese writing script katakana, which was originally introduced in the 9th century as a means by which Buddhist monks could correctly interpret Chinese pronunciations, is now most commonly used to embrace foreign words for which there is no original Japanese character; pizza or hamburger for example. Likewise, the western world’s exposure to and familiarity with foreign cultures now means that words such as sushi, nan bread, and kebab, for example, are used by diners regularly.
  2. However, the expansion of our vocabulary is just one element involved in how and why language evolves. Given the variation of dialects or regional accents present in most language systems, it is clear that an individual’s interpretation of what is correct and commonly used will vary quite dramatically since this perception is based upon a combination of factors including the age, educational level and region of the country a person is from. As we go about our daily lives and interact with others from different backgrounds and experiences, the language we hear is often taken on board and incorporated into how we communicate ourselves. Many phrases with American origins are now commonplace in British English for example, due to the frequency with which they are heard on television and in the movies.
  3. Changes in language are often driven by the young and many such changes are commonly considered by older people to be a disintegration of standards rather than an evolution and an improvement. Let’s consider an Americanism commonly used by youngsters in all pans of the English speaking world. Used as an alternative to “Tom said…” it is now commonplace to hear “Tom goes, the pay rise was unacceptable.” or, “Tom was all, the pay rise was unacceptable.”; much to the horror of many traditionalists. However, this modification could also be considered to be adding to and not detracting from our ability to communicate effectively. To illustrate, let’s consider the original phrase “Tom said”; it is used solely to show the listener that we are reporting the words of Tom, while the modern variation, “Tom goes” has the same meaning. However, if the speaker chooses instead to use the latter phrase, “Tom was all”, they are also able to convey the message that Tom had an emotional reaction to the situation they are reporting, therefore a much more effective method of communicating information has been created, some may say. However, should the now commonly used texting abbreviations such as ‘gr8t’ (great) and ‘l8r’ (later) become permanent replacements of the original words, it is likely that even the most liberal amongst us would be horrified.
  4. Variations on the language are usually more readily accepted into informal language before being absorbed for use in formal writing. Examples of words that we now commonly use, but were once considered incorrect, are ‘pea’ and ‘hopefully’. Let’s take pea; it derived from the word ‘pease’, which is an uncountable noun that has the same form regardless of whether one or more pease were being spoken about. However, this was commonly overlooked and misunderstood, and through error, the singular form of the vegetable became ‘pea’. More recently ‘hopefully’ was considered by many to be an inappropriate alternative to ‘I hope’; at best only accepted in informal use. The word hopefully is now’ fully acceptable in both informal speech and formal writing.
  5. Some people believe that traditional usages of language are always more superior and refined than modern variations even when the reasons behind the rule were dubious in the first place. For example, it was once seriously frowned upon to split an infinitive in a sentence and even today it is considered grammatically incorrect to do so. To demonstrate, let’s consider the following sentence: ‘The examiner asked me to quietly leave the room’; this was considered incorrect as the word ‘quietly’ splits the infinitive of the verb ‘to leave’. The origins of this rule hail back to the 17th century when scholars believed that the English language should be adapted to follow the rules of Latin; then considered the perfect language. Since splitting infinitives in Latin is impossible, it was decided that splitting infinitives in English, even though possible, was not acceptable, Given those initial motivations behind the rule were questionable and the clarity of the meaning of the sentence is not compromised in the ‘incorrect’ form, it could be argued that this grammar rule is a prime example of an unnecessary sanction which is likely to be abandoned in the future.
  6. As language evolves, changes in grammar structures that would confuse the actual meaning of the sentences are unlikely; however, the meanings of words are often modified or altered beyond recognition by different generations and can be easily misinterpreted by other social groups. Take, for example, the modern version of the word ‘bad’ meaning ‘great’ when used in contemporary slang. Many slang words remain dated in the era in which they are developed, for example, words like ‘to beef, meaning to complain (introduced in the 1920s) are not only dated but may not even be understood in a modern context, while others such as ‘guy’ become absorbed into mainstream language. Who knows what future generations will add to the ever-changing environment of communication?

Questions 1-4

There are six paragraphs A-F.
Write the correct numbers from i-viii in boxes 1-4 on the answer sheet.
Choose the correct heading for paragraphs B, C, E, and F from the list given below-

LIST OF HEADINGS
i Historical acceptance of change
ii The Generation Gap
iii Influences on speech
iv Ancient writing in Asia
v
vi Slang expected in the future
vii Questioning logic
viii Lifespan of vocabulary
  1. Paragraph B

Answer- iii
Supporting Sentence
- Given the variations of dialects or regional accents present in most language systems, it is clear that an individual's interpretation of what is actually correctly and commonly used will vary quite dramatically since this perception is based upon a combination of factors including the age, educational level and region of the country a person is from.
Keywords
- Variations in dialects, regional accents, interpretation, perception
Keyword Location
- Paragraph B
Explanation
- Paragraph B states that it is obvious that an individual's interpretation of what is actually correct and commonly used will vary quite dramatically given the variations of dialects or regional accents present in most language systems, as this perception is based upon a combination of factors including the person's age, educational level, and region of origin. Thus, option iii is the right choice. 

  1. Paragraph C

Answer- ii
Supporting Sentence
- Changes in language are often driven by the young and many such changes are commonly considered by older people to be a disintegration of standards rather than evolution and improvement.
Keywords
- changes, disintegration, standards, evolution, improvement
Keyword Location
- Paragraph C
Explanation
- It can be said from the paragraph C of this passage that it discusses the opposing viewpoints of the older and younger generations on language evolution, with the latter group appearing to have a pessimistic stance. Thus, option ii is the right choice.

  1. Paragraph E

Answer- vii
Supporting Sentence
- The examiner asked me to quietly leave the room’; this was considered incorrect as the word 'quietly' splits the infinitive of the verb 'to leave'.
Given that initial motivations behind the rule were questionable and the clarity of the meaning of the sentence is not compromised in the 'incorrect' form, it could be argued that this grammar rule is a prime example of an unnecessary sanction which is likely to be abandoned in the future.
Keywords
- infinitive, motivations, clarity, grammar, sanction
Keyword Location
- Paragraph E
Explanation
- In the paragraph E of the passage, it is discussed how some individuals attempt to logically analyse both conventional and contemporary linguistic usage. The sentence demonstrates how a person attempts to question the purpose of the grammar rules and seeks to understand its logic. Therefore, option vii is the correct one. 

  1. Paragraph F

Answer- viii
Supporting Sentence
- The meanings of words are often modified or altered beyond recognition by different generations and can be easily misinterpreted by other social groups
Who knows what future generations will add to the ever changing environment of communication?
Keywords
- modified, altered, recognition, generations, misinterpreted \, communication
Keyword Location
- Paragraph F
Explanation
- Language evolution and change are discussed in the paragraph F of the passage. It makes us consider how quickly sentences can change in meaning, which could lead to misunderstandings and be readily misread by various social groupings. Thus, option viii is an appropriate answer here. 

Questions 5-10

Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer?
In boxes 5-10 on your answer sheet write-

Yes, if the statement agrees with the passage
No, if the statement is contradictory to the passage
Not Given, if no information regarding the topic is mentioned in the passage.

  1. If language were static, it would negatively affect our ability to incorporate other cultures into our own way of life.

Answer- Yes
Supporting Sentence
- Language everywhere changes over time; it has to.
Keywords
- modification, developments, exposure, familiarity
Keyword Location
- Paragraph A
Explanation
- According to the paragraph A, if the language doesn't change, we will lose our ability to interact with the outside world. The development and blending of many civilizations is facilitated by linguistic changes. Thus, the above statement is correct. 

  1. The language we grow up knowing and that we adopt through new experiences have equal effects on the way we speak.

Answer- NOT GIVEN
Explanation
- No particular information with this sentences is availaible in the passage, hence the above sentence stands as an invalid one.

  1. English used in Britain has changed more than American English over recent years.

Answer- NOT GIVEN
Explanation
- No pertinent information regarding the above context is given in the passage, and thus, the sentence is invalid. 

  1. Some older variations of language are more expressive than more modern forms.

Answer- NOT GIVEN
Explanation
- The section of the passage has no relevant information about the preceding context, hence the assertion is invalid.

  1. All modern adaptations of language are suitable for mainstream use.

Answer- No
Supporting Sentence
- As language evolves, changes in grammar structures which would result in confusion of the actual meaning of the sentences are unlikely; however, the meanings of words are often modified or altered beyond recognition by different generations and can easily be misinterpreted by other social groups.
Keywords
- Grammar structure, confusion, meaning, modified, altered.
Keyword Location
- Paragraph F
Explanation
- It is stated explicitly in paragraph F that language enhancement may result in misunderstandings and misunderstandings. Hence, the answer is incorrect.

  1. All word usage has changed over time due to misunderstandings of meaning.

Answer- No
Supporting Sentence
- while others such as ‘guy’ become absorbed into mainstream language. Who knows what future generations will add to the ever changing environment of communication?
Keywords
- future generations, ever changing
Keyword Location
- Paragraph F, last 2-3 lines
Explanation
- The last 2-3 lines of paragraph F in the passages do not mention that every word usage will change through time. Therefore, the above said statement is an incorrect one.

Questions 11-13

Complete the summary of paragraphs E and F with the list of words A-H below.

On your answer sheet, write the correct answer A-H in boxes 11-13.

A Slang
B Split infinitives
C Grammatically incorrect
D Meaning
E Recognition
F Disregarded
G Misinterpreted
H Confusion
  1. Some grammar rules such as avoiding­­­ ­_______ are deeply entrenched in history and were created by academics who wished to perfect the English language.

Answer- B
Supporting Sentence
- it was once seriously frowned upon to split an infinitive in a sentence and even today it is considered grammatically incorrect to do so.
Keywords
- frowned upon, infinitive, grammatically incorrect.
Keyword Location
- Paragraph E
Explanation
- Paragraph E suggests that some principles have remained constant over time, and those who adhere to more traditional grammar usage may not approve of its modification. However, dividing an infinitive is still incorrect linguistically even now. Thus, option B is an appropriate choice here. 

  1. It is likely, however, since they do not impact on the _______of the sentence

Answer- D
Supporting Sentence
- the clarity of the meaning of the sentence is not compromised in the "incorrect" form.
Keywords
- clarity, compromised
Keyword Location
- Paragraph E
Explanation
- The paragraph E explains that the wrong or contemporary norms have no effect on the sentence's true meaning. Thus, option D is the right answer here.

  1. that such rules are likely to be _______ in the future.

Answer- F
Supporting Sentence
- This grammar rule is a prime example of an unnecessary sanction which is likely to be abandoned in the future.
Keywords
- prime example, sanction, abandoned
Keyword Location
- Paragraph E
Explanation
- "Disregarded," the term "abandoned" is used in the text of paragraph E. The sentence implies that this pointless punishment will probably be dropped or ignored in the future. Thus, option F will be an applicable answer for the question.

Read more IELTS Reading Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show