In the IELTS reading test candidates' reading abilities are assessed. It runs for 60 minutes and there are a total of 40 questions to answer. The IELTS Reading section gives students a passage and questions. Candidates must answer the questions, each of which is unique. The IELTS Reading tests students' reading, accessing and answering skills. In this IELTS Reading Answers, there are two types of questions for the passage The Dinosaurs Footprints and Extinction
Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching- Join for Free Trial Class Now
Read the Passage to Answer the Following Questions
Solution and Explanation
Questions 1-6
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage? In boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet, write
YES if the statement agrees with the information
NO if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this passage
Answer: YES
Supporting sentence: That is the thesis proposed by Paul Olsen, of Columbia University, and his colleagues in this week’s Science.
Keywords: Paul Olsen, Colleagues
Keyword Location: Paragraph A, last line
Explanation: It was proposed by Dr. Paul Olsen and his colleagues said that something big (asteroid) hit the earth which was the reason behind the extinction of the great reptiles.
Read More IELTS Reading Related Samples
Answer: NOT GIVEN
Answer: YES
Supporting sentence: Dinosaur skeletons are rare. Dinosaur footprints are, however, surprisingly abundant.
Keywords: Skeletons, footprints
Keyword Location: Paragraph C, 1st line
Explanation: Dr. Olsen and his colleagues focused on the prints, not bones as the sizes of the prints are as good as an indication of the sizes of the beasts as are the skeletons. On the other hand, dinosaur skeletons are also very rare.
Answer: NOT GIVEN
Answer: NO
Supporting sentence: The researchers looked at 18 so-called ‘ichnotaxa’. These are recognizable types of footprint that cannot be matched precisely with the species of animal that left them.
Keywords: ichnotaxa, matched
Keyword Location: Paragraph E, 1st line
Explanation: Ichnotaxa contrasting to the statement showed that footprints of dinosaurs do not offer exact information of the trace left by an individual species. They can only be matched with a general sort of animal, and thus only act as an indicator of the fate of that group.
Answer: NO
Supporting sentence: Iridium is normally rare at the earth’s surface, but it is more abundant in meteorites.
Keywords: Iridium, meteorites
Keyword Location: Paragraph F, 3rd line
Explanation: As per the information provided in the passage, iridium is generally rare at the earth’s surface and is more abundant in meteorites. Therefore, the statement clearly contradicts the information mentioned in the passage.
Questions 7-13
Write your answers in boxes 7-13 on your answer sheet.
Dr. Olsen and his colleagues applied a phenomenon named_______(7) to explain the large size of the Eubrontes, which is a similar case to that nowadays reptiles invade a place where there are no______(8); for example, on an island called Komodo, indigenous huge lizards grow so big that people even regarding them as_____(9). However, there were no old impact traces being found? The answer may be that we have_____(10) the evidence. Old craters are difficult to spot or it is probably_____(11) due to the effect of the earth moving. Even a crater formed in Ocean had been_____(12) under the impact of crust movement. Beside the third hypothesis is that the potential evidence - some craters may be_____(13).
7.
Answer: Ecological release
Supporting sentence: Dr. Olsen and his colleagues suggest that the explanation for this rapid increase in size may be a phenomenon called ecological release.
Keywords: phenomenon, Dr. Olsen
Keyword Location: Paragraph I, first line
Explanation: Dr. Olsen and his colleagues applied a phenomenon named ‘ecological release’.
8.
Answer: Competitors
Supporting sentence: This is seen today when reptiles (which, in modern times, tend to be small creatures) reach islands where they face no competitors.
Keywords: reptiles, invade
Keyword Location: Paragraph I, 2nd line
Explanation: The ecological release is seen when reptiles reach islands where they face no competitors.
9.
Answer: Dragon
Supporting sentence: The most spectacular example is on the Indonesian island of Komodo, where local lizards have grown so large that they are often referred to as dragons.
Keywords: example, Komodo
Keyword Location: Paragraph I, 3rd line
Explanation: In the indigenous islands of Komodo, a particular species of lizards have grown so big in size that locals there often refer to them as dragons.
10.
Answer: Overlooked
Supporting sentence: That leaves the question of where the impact happened. No large hole in the earth’s crust seems to be 202m years old. It may, of course, have been overlooked.
Keywords: question, impact
Keyword Location: Paragraph J, 1st line
Explanation: As a reason for overlooking the pieces of evidence, there was no old impact trace being found. As not a single large hole in the earth’s crust seems to be 202m years old.
11.
Answer: (have) Vanished
Supporting sentence: Old craters are eroded and buried, and not always easy to find. Alternatively, it may have vanished.
Keywords: old craters, eroded
Keyword Location: Paragraph J, line 4
Explanation: Old craters are difficult to spot or they probably vanished due to the effect of the earth moving.
12.
Answer: Swallowed up
Supporting sentence: There is no ocean floor left that is more than 200m years old, so a crater that formed in the ocean would have been swallowed up by now.
Keywords: crater, ocean
Keyword Location: Paragraph J, line 6
Explanation: As there is no ocean floor left that dates more than 200m years old, even a crater formed in the ocean had been swallowed up under the impact of crush movement.
13.
Answer: Misdated
Supporting sentence: There is a third possibility, however. This is because the crater is known, but has been misdated.
Keywords: third, possibility
Keyword Location: Paragraph K, 1st line.
Explanation: Apart from the two possibilities (thesis) already proposed, a third possibility may be that the potential shreds of evidence- some craters may be misdated.
Comments