The Burgess Shale Fossils Reading Answers is an academic reading answers topic. The Burgess Shale Fossils Reading Answers have a total of 13 IELTS questions in total. In the questions, you have to write TRUE, FALSE and NOT GIVEN as per the statements given in the passage. You have to choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS AND/OR A NUMBER and choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage.
Candidates should read the IELTS Reading passage thoroughly to recognize synonyms, identify keywords, and answer the questions below. IELTS Reading practice papers, which feature topics such as The Burgess Shale Fossils Reading Answers. Candidates can use IELTS reading practice questions and answers to enhance their performance in the reading section.
Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now
Read the Text Below and Answer Questions
Fauna vanished with a whimper, not a bang Some discoveries are so unusual it takes decades and sometimes even centuries to understand their full significance. One such discovery is the fossil bed known as the ago. It was discovered in the Canadian Rockies over a century ago and was popularized in 1989 in a book, Wonderful Life, by Stephen Jay Gould an American paleontologist. The Burgess Shale fossils were created at a time when the future Canadian land mass was situated near the Earth's equator. The creatures were preserved when an entire marine ecosystem was buried in mud that eventually hardened and became exposed hundreds of millions of years later in an outcrop of the Rocky Mountains.
American palaeontologist Charles Walcott, following reports of fabulous fossils finds by construction workers on Canadian railways who were digging in the mountains in the late 19th century, is said to have tripped over a block of shale in 1909 that revealed the area's remarkable supply of specimens. It has long been believed that the curious fauna that lived there vanished in a series of extinction because the fossil record ends abruptly, but that no longer appears to be the case.
The Burgess Shale began to form soon after a period of time known as the Cambrian explosion, when most major groups of complex animals arose over a surprisingly short period. Before 560m years ago, most living things were either individual cells or simple colonies of cells. Then, and for reasons that remain a mystery, life massively diversified and became ever more complex as the rate of evolution increased. An unusual feature of the Burgess Shale is that it is one of the earliest fossil beds to contain impressions of the soft body parts alongside the remains of bones and shells, which is highly unusual.
Although the fossil bed was discovered on a mountain, these animals originally existed below an ocean, the bed of which was later pushed up to create the Rockies. Nobody knows exactly why they were so well preserved. One possibility is that the creatures were buried quickly and in conditions that were hostile to the bacteria that cause decomposition of soft body parts. Those that first worked on the Burgess Shale, unearthing 65,000 specimens over a 14- year period up to 1924, assumed that the fossils came from extinct members of groups of animals in existence today. This turned out to be misleading because many of the creatures are so unusual that they are still difficult to classify.
One such example is Opabinia, a creature that grew to about 8cm (3 inches), had five eyes, a body that was a series of lobes, a tail in the shape of a fan and that ate using a long proboscis. The proboscis had a set of grasping claws on the end, with which it grabbed food and stuff it into its mouth. Nectocaris, meanwhile, could be mistaken for a leech, with fins and tentacles. Weirdest of all was Hallucigenia, described by paleontologist Simon Conway Morris when he re-examined Walcott's specimens in 1979. With its multiplicity of spines and tentacles, little about Hallucigenia made sense. Like an abstract painting, its orientation is a mystery at first, making it difficult to work out which way up it went, which hole food went into, and which hole food came out of.
Paleontologists had long thought that many of the Burgess Shale animals were examples of experiments in evolution. In other words, entirely new forms of life that did not survive or lead to other groups or species. Hallucigenia, ironically, turned out to be the exception that proves the rule. It is now thought to be an ancestor of the modern group of arthropods, which includes everything from flies and butterflies to centipedes and crabs. Now another misconception has been quashed. Writing in Nature, Peter Van Roy of Yale University and his colleagues suggest that the sudden absence of such crazy soft-bodied fossils does not indicate a mass extinction, but merely an end to the unusual local circumstances that caused the creatures to be preserved. In an area of the Atlas Mountains of Morocco, Van Roy's team of researchers have found another diverse (and sometimes bizarre) assemblage of soft-bodied organisms from a period after the Burgess Shale was formed. One discovery includes something that may be a stalked barnacle.
This suggests that the evolution of such complex life went on uninterrupted. For its part, the Burgess Shale continues to produce an astonishing array of indefinable creatures faster than paleontologists can examine them. The world still has plenty to learn about this wonderful life.
Solution and Explantion
Questions 1 - 5
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
In boxes 1-5 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN there is no information on this
Answer: TRUE
Supporting statement:“.......It was discovered in the Canadian Rockies over a century ago and was popularized in 1989 in a book, Wonderful Life, by Stephen Jay Gould, an American paleontologist..........”
Keywords: popularized, book
Keyword Location: para 1, Line 3
Explanation: The passage clearly states that the Burgess Shale was popularized by Stephen Jay Gould's book, making it widely known to the public.
Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation: The para does not mention anything about Walcott needing or obtaining permission from authorities, so we cannot conclude this from the passage.
Answer: TRUE
Supporting statement:“........it is one of the earliest fossil beds to contain impressions of the soft body parts alongside the remains of bones and shells.........”
Keywords: parts, bones
Keyword Location: para 3, Line 5
Explanation: The passage mentions that the Burgess Shale contains both soft body parts and hard body parts like bones and shells, confirming the statement.
Answer: FALSE
Supporting statement:“.........these animals originally existed below an ocean.........”
Keywords: animals, ocean
Keyword Location: para 3, Line 1
Explanation: The para clearly mentions that the creatures were marine animals that existed below the ocean, not land animals.
Answer: FALSE
Supporting statement:“........Hallucigenia...is now thought to be an ancestor of the modern group of arthropods..........”
Keywords: Hallucigenia, ancestor
Keyword Location: para
Explanation: The passage states that Hallucigenia is believed to be an ancestor of modern arthropods, contradicting the statement that it is unrelated to any modern creature.
Questions 6 - 9
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS AND/OR A NUMBER from the passage for each answer.
Burgess Shale
Formation:
- Burgess Shale was formed following a time called the (6)....
Answer: CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION
Supporting statement:“.........soon after a period of time known as the Cambrian explosion........”
Keywords: explosion, period
Keyword Location: para 2, Line 1
Explanation: The formation period of the Burgess Shale is known as the Cambrian explosion.
Discovery and Investigation in the twentieth century:
- discovered in 1909
- Charles Walcott learned of the fossil finds from people building a (7)..
Answer: RAILWAY
Supporting statement:“.......fabulous fossil finds by construction workers on Canadian railways who were digging in the mountains..........”
Keywords: finds, railways
Keyword Location: para 2, Line 2
Explanation: The passage states that Walcott learned about the fossils from railway construction workers.
- the first work on Burgess Shale was undertaken at the start of the century
- a researcher looked at Burgess Shale findings again in (8).....
Answer: 1979
Supporting statement:“........described by palaeontologist Simon Conway Morris when he re-examined Walcott's specimens in 1979..........”
Keywords: re-examined, 1979
Keyword Location: para 4, Line 3
Explanation: It is given about a re-examination of the specimens in 1979.
Recent theories:
- Peter Van Roy
- believes that discoveries in Morocco show that the (9)................ of complex life forms continued
Answer: EVOLUTION
Supporting statement:“.........suggests that the evolution of such complex life went on uninterrupted.........”
Keywords: evolution, uninterrupted
Keyword Location: para 6, Line 3
Explanation: The para indicates the continuation of the evolution of complex life forms.
Questions 10 -13
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
Burgess Shale Creatures
Name | Feature |
Opabinia | - five eyes - tail resembling a (10)............•... - claws used to hold (11)................. |
Nectocaris | - looked like a (12)................. - fins - tentacles |
Hallucigenia | - spines used to (13)................. - tentacles |
Q.10
Answer: FAN
Supporting statement:“........had five eyes, a body that was a series of lobes, a tail in the shape of a fan.........”
Keywords: tail, fan
Keyword Location: para 4, Line 4
Explanation: The passage describes the tail of Opabinia as a fan-shape.
Q.11
Answer: FOOD
Supporting statement:“.......proboscis had a set of grasping claws on the end, with which it grabbed food and stuffed it into its mouth..........”
Keywords: claws, food
Keyword Location: para 4, Line 6
Explanation: The claws were used to hold food.
Q.12
Answer: LEECH
Supporting statement:“........Nectocaris, meanwhile, could be mistaken for a leech, with fins and tentacles.........”
Keywords: leech, fins
Keyword Location: para 4, Line 8
Explanation: Nectocaris is compared to a leech. Hence leech is the correct answer.
Q.13
Answer: MOVE
Supporting statement:“.........Although the passage does not explicitly state the purpose of the spines, the context suggests that the spines were likely used for protection.........”
Keywords: spines, protect
Keyword Location: para 5 line 6
Explanation: Given the nature of spines in general and the description of Hallucigenia as having a multiplicity of spines, it's reasonable to infer they served a protective function.
Read More IELTS Reading Related Samples
Comments