Supermarkets are Selling Products That are Imported from other Countries IELTS Writing Task 2

People are now demonstrating a higher interest in consuming imported foods as a result of rising consumerism and exposure to foreign cuisine. For instance, despite the fact that the US does not have the ideal temperature for cultivating this fruit, pomegranates are incredibly popular among US customers. As a result, America imports massive amounts of pomegranates from tropical nations. These items are kept in stock at supermarkets because they draw customers looking to try something new and exotic. Fortunately, the movement toward globalisation has given customers the opportunity to get interested in trying foods from other cultures. For farmers in emerging nations, having stable markets for their produced fruits and vegetables is a desirable development. For instance, Europeans can consume sweet and fresh mangoes at any time from tropical regions. However, purchasing imported items could be detrimental to the domestic economy. However, importing food items can help each country's food security and counteract price volatility.

Foods that are cultivated locally, on the other hand, don't have the same attraction because people are already too familiar with them.

Imported food can make it harder for local farmers to make a living. Food imports occasionally cost less than food that is readily accessible locally. In this situation, the consumer will undoubtedly favour the imported product. Local farmers' livelihoods are impacted by this. The need to apply preservatives to imported foods in order to extend their shelf life is another drawback. People may have a variety of health issues as a result of eating certain meals frequently. The environment is also affected by imports. In order to transport food thousands of miles, enormous amounts of fossil fuels are burned.

In other words, stores sell imported food because customers want to experience new flavours and textures. I feel that the practice of importing food can be detrimental to regional producers. It is harmful to both the environment and human health.

To begin with, with advancements in the contemporary period, importation and exportation of products proliferated. As a result, supermarkets sell items that are imported from abroad and avoid local producers for a variety of reasons. The primary factor is globalisation, which encourages trade between different countries.

Such imported goods meet this criteria because of their greater quality, quantity, and wide range of options. Because of this, people's tastes evolve and they advocate for such things. For instance, genetically modified crops are foreign substances that offer several advantages to farmers. Aspects such as increased yield, disease resistance, and so forth. Another significant worry is the growth of the industrial and corporate sectors. Such sections are maximised according to this theory. This causes foreign industries to be established in each other's countries, resulting in the importation and creation of novel goods. This leads to an increase in the quality and quantity of services offered to the public.

It is important to keep in mind that this creates a bad impression overall. Because these commodities are traded without using local suppliers. Therefore, this could result in the destruction of agricultural expertise and have a negative influence on farmers' revenue. Because if people start promoting foreign goods, local sources that are made by local employees would be minimised. As a result, employment and income decline. Additionally, this results in the burning of fossil fuels during transportation, which destroys natural resources. because there are many forms of transportation that rely on fossil fuels. This causes the atmosphere to produce hazardous gases, which causes global warming.

To summarise, from my perspective, supermarkets used to sell foreign items rather than local ones in the past. Despite the fact that there are significant reasons for this. However, this also encourages a downward spiral for the general people and the environment.

One of the main causes of this predicament is. First and foremost, the abundance of imported goods due to social media's influence and to globalisation. This is where people are constantly connected to one another through technology.

For instance, data from Harvard University indicates that over 87% of all nations worldwide have some impact from American culture. Whether it is through the cuisine or the music.

Another factor contributing to this setback is the volume and diversity of imported goods. These are far more plentiful and diverse than locally produced goods in terms of uniqueness and allure. Additionally, some imported products provide both better costs and higher-quality products. Take The New York Times' study as an example, which found that the same cell phone could be purchased for three times less when purchased elsewhere. In other words, while buyers might save money, the competition among items may result in superior results.

Finally, the lack of investment in regional and small businesses makes the current situation a negative advancement. Additionally, the lack of stimulus could force small businesses into insolvency. The economy of small cities suffers the most when there is a greater investment in foreign goods. For instance, in some towns, the epidemic forced the closure of about 73% of local services.

In conclusion, imported commodities can advance society by expanding people's horizons in some areas. But there are more complex negative effects since they can jeopardise local services. Therefore, in order to prevent further drawbacks, a precise equilibrium is required.