Some Say You Should Always Marry For Love IELTS Writing Task 2

Undoubtedly, money is important in our life. Accepting a spouse who doesn't have wealth or at minimum a job to support their family is difficult for anyone. If considere to an extent, marriage for money is accepted and allowed. If they do not have access to money, they will not be able to meet even their most basic demands. Which are shared by all residents, for an extended period of time.

In addition, love ought to be the foundation of every marriage. First of all, love is a powerful connection that unites two people with separate lives into one. So that they can work through difficulties that arise in their lives together, they can express their emotions, including joy and grief. In addition, love makes a person accountable to their partner as well as to themselves. Love-based marriage is always recommended.

Some believe that since many societies are facing welfare uncertainty, new couples profit from marriage based on money. In other words, newlyweds have significantly fewer responsibilities when they can depend on strong foundations. For example, for a husband and wife with stable assets, purchasing or renting a home. And paying taxes or tuition for children is considerably less of a hardship. Both love and money, in my opinion, are crucial. A financially dependent marriage that would end when the money ran out. A marriage that is based solely on love, on the other hand. Would end if the couple was unable to make enough money to take care of their family's needs. Including paying the rent or mortgage and other payments. Therefore, despite the possibility of an imbalance in their contributions, love and money should stand together.

To sum up, a marriage that lacked both resources and love would fail miserably. So I think they each contribute in their own unique way to a happy life.

First of all, getting married to the person you love allows you to live with someone you already share a specific level of understanding with. Knowing your spouse makes adjusting to a new family situation much simpler. For instance, a husband's wife can change her cooking style by being aware of his eating patterns. Because of this, choosing love over marriage makes it easier for the couple to communicate with one another.

Second, a long-term connection built on respect and care is developed when adoring couples have their sentiments tied to one another. Giving flowers to one's wife, for instance, truly conveys a close emotional bond. For these reasons, many people decide to get married for reasons other than love.

Contrarily, choosing a spouse based solely on riches only results in fleeting happiness. The reason is that it's impossible for one person to keep a specific level of wealth, and highs and lows are inevitable. For instance, if a relationship is founded on money, suffering a big business loss can cause problems. This makes a wedding that is dependent on money little more than a momentary delight.

Similar to this, avarice is a rising trend. A partner cannot constantly satisfy increasing demands, which eventually erodes a materialistic relationship. Because of these factors, wealth shouldn't ever come first in a marriage.

In conclusion, some individuals place a high importance on previous knowledge and emotional ties, supporting love while making marriage-related decisions. On the other hand, some people put money before temporary happiness and unquenchable wants. According to me, the best option for a successful, long-lasting partnership is love.

People who are against weddings formed out of love contend that marriages cannot succeed if the pair is financially insecure. If people can't live comfortably, money takes precedence and love takes flight. This idea's detractors also contend that love is merely an emotion that can grow even after marriage. People often fall in love while on a wonderful trip or while spending opulent holidays together. In the past, parents would select a life partner for their children. Based on their intelligence and a number of other qualities, with money being one of the key determining factors. Even at that time, marriages were successful. Divorce cases are rarely reported.

Directly in opposition, selecting a mate exclusively on the basis of wealth only leads to momentary contentment. The rationale is that highs and lows in wealth are unavoidable; no one can maintain a constant level of wealth. For illustration, if a marriage is financially based, a significant business loss may be problematic. This reduces a wedding that depends on money to nothing more than passing pleasure.

Advocates of love marriages claim that even under challenging life circumstances, spouses can communicate with one another. They can work together to overcome obstacles and find solutions. Second, a person's financial situation may change as they progress through life. The shift in the economy won't have an impact on these marriages. And finally, because the couple knows they are compatible before being married, love marriages are very successful.

To sum up, choosing to be married for money or love is a personal choice that may also be influenced by culture and custom. According to me, love is a key component of a healthy and fulfilling marriage, and people should be married out of love, not out of need.