Some People Think that Universities should not Provide so much Theoretical Knowledge IELTS Writing Task 2

Starting off, attending universities is the ideal approach to get information. Because they frequently teach theoretical material. And because those who wish to succeed in the future can only do so if they have strong academic credentials. Additionally, students that enroll in university courses read books, are knowledgeable about history and culture, and work to preserve such cultures. Other than that, people who attend colleges can develop their writing abilities. Because they spend the majority of their time reading books, which may result in improved reading abilities.

Giving practical training has the primary benefit of exposing youth to the real world. Which will help them develop their interpersonal skills and enable them to thrive in today's cutthroat environment. For example, extensive research has consistently found that youth working in customer service positions. Such as those in banks, need to complete at least 2 months of vocational skills in their respective branches.

On the other hand, classroom practice training is important in colleges since most students prefer practical work over theoretical study. If theory work is continued, they may lose interest and receive a poor grade. In addition, many students prefer doing practical work. Because they find it easier to understand than other types of work. This is because some students struggle academically, so if they engage in other types of practical work. Like sports or developing a skill, they may find success in the long run.

In conclusion, both concepts are sound, and university staff members ought to give them equal weight. Because success depends on ways for people to improve their futures.

On the one extreme, the primary benefit of the traditional learning technique is that it helps students by providing a fundamental foundation. That supports their skills later. The learning techniques that support the subject's operational system is the basic foundation, to be more precise. For instance, it stands to reason that in order to implement successful marketing tactics, one needs to be able to conceptualize the 4Cs and 4Ps models. Students, intellectuals, and academics could also understand these professors' critical thinking. And apply it to their professional lives by reading the academic study done by professional professionals.

However, I fully believe that it is important to provide intellectuals with opportunities for hands-on learning. One of the most compelling arguments for doing so is the fact that, once students graduate, these abilities will be more useful in the long term. For instance, institutions could enhance students' internship-only abilities in risk or management of human resources. As a result, the intellectuals' experience will be greatly improved, enabling them to effectively handle problems at work. Additionally, it is advised that educational institutions give students opportunities for teamwork. So they can develop into successful, thorough, and desirable teammates.

Additionally, a significant benefit of technical experience is that it helps students develop interpersonal skills. They need to thrive in today's cutthroat world. If they have performed experiments, they may create engaging resumes that will increase their value and competitiveness compared to non-experimenters. Nowadays, practically all businesses often hire individuals with real-world experience. To Conclude, Despite the significant advantages of having a wealth of academic information. I continue to believe that practical advice is indispensable in the university education system. Additionally, it is anticipated that every academic setting would eventually adopt the trend of increased practical sessions.

First, studying from theory in pertinent scholarly circles to identify existing knowledge allows us to obtain a professional insight. Despite being the most traditional educational technique. Students, for instance, may quickly recognize facts and viewpoints from previous discussions. Additionally, when provided relevant theoretical examples to draw upon, pupils learn more quickly. For instance, using textbook examples to help students understand complex academic theories in history or sociology enables them to build on such theories. On the other hand, there are some drawbacks for students.

Students will learn good lessons and gain some experience from their mistakes through practical instruction. They practice in the real world and put what they learn into practice. If they lose, they will recognize the step they made and learn from their mistakes. For instance, several French majors mandate that students complete a few minor assignments and submit a commentary each semester. As a result, more students are being accepted by large corporations.

On the other extreme, it is undeniable that students may end up reading tiresome and boring academic articles. For example, university degrees that require examination of multiple "long-winded" academic discourses. Only inspire pupils a bit while dampening their excitement. Evidently, conducting empirical research in the classroom can pique students' interests. This refers to the idea that "the human mind remembers best by action." Making mistakes and learning from them takes time, but there is no replacement for it.

Finally, even if both strategies in our dynamic academic environment have advantages and disadvantages. I genuinely think that a more pragmatic strategy encourages a stronger assimilation of academic knowledge. Despite the potential for comprehensiveness in theoretical instruction, practical learning results in more beneficial education for future generations.