Some People Think That The Government Should Ban Dangerous Sports IELTS Writing Task 2

Some people think that the government should ban dangerous sports IELTS Writing Task 2 consists of three sample answers provided below. The task requires the candidates to provide a tentative and argumentative answer to the question. The sample answers comprise two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description of the topic. The body contains argumentative statements and tentative answers to support the test-taker's perspective.
IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Some people think that the government should ban dangerous sports, while others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport.

Model Answer 1:

Many think that the government should take an active stance of banning those sports which are life-risking while many still believe that the government should not hinder the freedom to do or to play any sport. Banning a sport can be a hugely debatable topic as banning a particular sport can put a halt to numerous people who are an expert in that particular sport. Both sides have valid arguments to take forward their notion but let’s take a tour of these arguments before concluding.

To begin with, every activity or any sport which we play in our life involves some sort of risk. The probability and the possibility of the risk may vary from sport to sport, but whatever we do may indeed involve physical risk or any other sort of risk. Many sports involve various physical injuries but banning them because of these injuries may sound weird and useless. For instance, games like football can sometimes cause foot injuries. The sport cricket can cause wrist or leg injury but we cannot simply ban these sports for the safety of the player. Moreover, every player’s ability is tested before they participate in any6 sport. They are trained physically as well as mentally to fit into a particular sport.

Simultaneously banning a sport can seem to be curtailing the right to freedom to choose. Every individual has their own choices and the government cannot simply ban their wishes until it harms any other person. Besides, banning a sport is more prudent to mitigate the risk factor and increase safety precautions to lessen the stress and burden. To conclude, I would state that banning a sport is not the only solution to decreasing the risk. There could be many ways in which you can simply decrease and minimize the risk factor.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Samples

Check: IELTS Actual Test ebooks Combo

Model Answer 2:

Health and safety have become the top-most priority in every arena, whether it is the working arena or in the sporting arena. Nowadays there is a tussle between two different notions i.e growing demands for banning dangerous sports, whereas many still believe that the government should not hinder the freedom to do any sport. So let’s first place ourselves in the position of these two-sided people and then conclude.

To begin with, it is comprehensible that dangerous sports involve or can cause injuries or even death which is the unsought result for any sport. This physical torture or severe injury can even affect the minds of the audience and bystanders. Moreover, other sports promote the behavior of violence not only among players but can also cause it among the audience.

On the other hand, we have more compelling reasons according to which the government should not hinder the freedom of players. Many players believe that some risky sports involve adventures that can give them a platform to improve. Without risking one cannot improve oneself. Thus, many people believe that these adventurous sports can improve a player to a greater level. For example, mountain climbing is a kind of adventurous sport in itself. Once accomplished it gives a sense of pride and instills the quality of persistence and patience throughout our life. Furthermore, the players are trained according to the needs of the game. They are tested physically and mentally before being allowed to participate in any dangerous game.

To crown it all, I would state that some changes regarding safety should be made in a particular sport from time to time but banning it may affect the very spirit of sport.

Model Answer 3:

There is a world of concern regarding various dangerous sports that can risk the life of an individual player. Various arguments are supporting the ban on these life-risking sports whereas there are other compelling arguments against the banning of the sport. According to my banning, a sport is not the appropriate practice as it harms the very spirit of the sport.

On one hand, there are many reasons which explicitly explain why these sports should not be banned. Firstly banning these dangerous sports is like banning the players from practicing their freedom. A government cannot hinder the freedom of an individual player. Many sports players find new zeal and enthusiasm when they play these sports. They develop themselves accordingly and enhance their quality of determination and persistence.

Additionally, these sports involve a lot of safety measures and set up which ensures that nothing could happen to the player. These safety measures should be ameliorated and changed with time and demand to ensure the full-fledged of a particular player. To summarize, instead of banning a sport, the government should invest more in the safety measures of an individual player.