Some People think that Media Should not Report Detail of Crimes to the Public IELTS Writing Task 2

First of all, kids will become aware of illicit activity and avoid it. Depending on the circumstance, individuals may be subject to a severe fine or perhaps years in prison if they fail to abide by the regulation. Second, through gaining knowledge about situations that result in crimes being committed or places where illegal behaviour is common. The general population will become more cautious about their own security and take steps to avoid becoming the next victim. People would typically avoid visiting a place where robberies and thefts were common, for instance. Although detailed reports of illegal acts have the benefits indicated above, they also have certain disadvantages. The main justification for this is that victims' psychological health may be irreparably traumatised by comprehensive accounts of horrible crimes. Without the victim's permission, blatantly vivid and graphic descriptions of heinous acts may give the victims of these crimes recurring nightmares. Additionally, the media will offer highly useful educational resources for criminals, letting them know what the police know and don't know. In order to avoid being discovered or apprehended, the criminal may be able to modify his or her behaviour as a result. One example is the bank heist that occurred in Vietnam last year. Bank robbers successfully carried out the robbery. And significantly harmed the nation's budget by gathering information about prior illicit operations over the Internet. At the end of the day, I think the disadvantages of detailed crime reports outweigh the advantages, despite the fact that they do have some advantages.

People will be more aware of their own safety and strive to avoid becoming the next victim if crimes are detailed, therefore this is beneficial. People would typically stay away from a place if they thought robberies and thefts were common there, for instance. Additionally, generally speaking, the specifics of the crime are disclosed together with the verdict. For some potential lawbreakers, this might serve as a deterrent. In light of the negative effects of committing crimes, some people may decide to abandon their illegal schemes. Though there are more issues with crime report details. First, comprehensive crime records have a detrimental impact on social security. The deep information on crimes that are released in the media might instruct people who wish to break the law but lack the requisite knowledge and abilities. As a result, there would be an increase in the number of crimes as they learned how to plan and carry out crimes. Moreover, by studying the experiences of previous offenders, some criminals may be inspired on how to avoid being apprehended by the authorities. If a potential criminal watched a report about how a criminal was apprehended by police as a result of his fingerprints being revealed. For example, he could realise the need of concealing his prints. Additionally, certain crime-related data are excessively gruesome and inspire fear in people about their surroundings. Some people may even come to despise governments, which would undermine societal stability. As was mentioned above, governments should limit the publication of crime-related information because it has more negative effects than positive ones.

I want to use the arguments I present in this essay to back up my points of view. I believe that rather than focusing on the specifics of the crimes, news organisations should focus more on the events themselves. Beginning with the fact that youngsters and teenagers who are interested in how crimes are carried out. And are prone to copy them unquestioningly are misled by the details of crimes, which are oftentimes inaccurate. Additionally, pornographic and excessively violent media can encourage criminal behaviour in adults. To put it another way, in-depth crime news can fuel people's perspective of criminal urges and cause a host of social issues. Furthermore, a thorough investigation report on a crime does not sufficiently respect the victims and their families. The privacy of those people is completely compromised, for instance, if a murder or robbery occurs in someone's home and is displayed in detail on television. The fact that occasionally this thorough explanation might really aid criminals is another extremely compelling argument in favour of media censorship. For instance, when terrorists targeted the Taj Hotel in Mumbai, information about the commandos' whereabouts was broadcast on TV. The terrorists who were hiding in the hotel saw this as well. In line with this, they adjusted their positions. Opponents, on the other hand, contend that because we have a right to know all the facts, the media must cover them all. I continue to believe that it would result in additional issues. I believe it is the responsibility of the media to point the public in the correct way. Instead of focusing on the specifics of the crime, it should present news in an impartial manner. In a word, while it is the media's responsibility to inform us, crime scene information should not be displayed.