Some People Think If A Country Is Already Rich IELTS Writing Task 2

Some People Think If A Country Is Already Rich IELTS Writing Task 2 consists of three sample answers provided below. The task requires the candidates to provide a tentative and argumentative answer to the question. The sample answers comprise two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description of the topic. The body contains argumentative statements and tentative answers to support the test-taker's perspective.
IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Some people think that if a country is already rich, any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Model Answer 1:

This topic talks about how some people think that if a country is already rich, any additional amount of economic wealth will not make the citizens happier. I agree with this view and place my reasons and views below to explain the same.

The main reason behind my agreeing with this view is, the more money the economy will get, it will automatically tend to make people stay in their comfort zone. Since they do not engage in any exercise or sporting activities, the vast majority of employees may suffer from health issues. Workers' major concern nowadays is being unable to keep track of time.

Many of them choose to spend their leisure time with friends or family. In many firms, working hours are generally from 9 a.m. to 17 p.m., with a lunch break between 12 and 13 p.m. Workers were required to get up early in order to begin their work at the time, and they might stay the entire day at the same location. Even if the task is not difficult, a boring day may be exhausting and drain a lot of energy throughout the day. These factors make employees feel compelled to take a break as soon as they get home. As a result, many of them spend their leisure time in front of the television or on the internet. As a result, full-time employees eventually grow lethargic.

As a first step, large corporations might organise intra-company or intercompany sporting events at the common sports field. Basketball, volleyball, and football, for example, are the most popular team sports that allow employees to socialize. Furthermore, some firms may arrange some personal exercise classes, such as yoga, Pilates, and fitness, for a fee. Employees will be able to access their sports facility during working hours or shortly after work, reducing idleness.

To summarise, the health issues that employees have as a result of not participating in sports might be addressed with more company assistance. They encourage employees to exercise in order to reduce health concerns.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Articles

Model Answer 2:

The ever-increasing affluence of elite nations has piqued the interest of social theorists who want to know how happy their citizens are. Some people believe that the scale of happiness has reached a plateau and that no additional progress can raise it, while others disagree.

Economies that have achieved significant progress throughout time, as evidenced by facts and statistics from recent surveys, are now approaching a saturation point, as economic prosperity has hit a plateau from which no further growth is conceivable. 

As a result, I believe that an increase in rich nations' prosperity does not always imply an increase in their level of happiness. People used to be ecstatic about every new improvement in economic conditions, but that emotion has faded now, as people's expectations have climbed to levels that will never be met by indulgence in shopping. Furthermore, higher income levels may not always imply an increase in one's sense of well-being. Rising inflation, shifting focus of home-grown businesses to outsourcing cheap labour and other resources, and other factors have made life more difficult in such countries. This has resulted in an increase in unemployment and a loss in economic possibilities in the local area.

Even if individuals receive sufficient and adequate assistance from governments, citizens' lack of meaningful involvement leads to increased dissatisfaction. However, it is readily argued that growing affluence fosters optimism since residents of affluent nations are considerably more confident in their own, as well as their children's and siblings', futures. They also have a sense of eternity since they are able to fulfill their responsibility to mankind by assisting the needy in other areas of the world.

Model Answer 3:

Economic conditions have improved in all countries throughout the world in recent years. However, it appears that emerging nations have done better than industrialized ones in improving their happiness metric. I agree with this assertion, and in this article, I will attempt to explain why this occurs.

The first reason why people in industrialized countries are not as happy as they once were is competition. Companies compete with one another as a result of economic expansion. Workers are subjected to new rules as a result of this condition. Employees are being pushed to work harder than ever before in order to keep up with the competition in terms of technology, quality, and quantity.

Consider the case of mobile phone providers. To entice customers, they compete to create innovative technologies. People in developing nations, on the other hand, are more focused on growing their businesses than competing with one another, as many of the firms are classified as small to medium businesses. Furthermore, people in developed countries already have enough wealth to enjoy a higher standard of living, so more wealth will not bring them any happiness. On the other hand, people in developing countries can enjoy a higher standard of living as a result of economic growth, which makes them happier. Another reason is the amount of time spent. When there is a lot of competition among firms, the workers have more work to perform. This will result in their spending more time at work rather than in their personal lives. Unconsciously, these businesses raise employee stress levels, implying that individuals in industrialized nations are not as happy as they once were. People in developing nations, on the other hand, are happy since they can make more money for their families than they could before, despite having to spend more time at work. It helps them feel less stressed.

From the arguments stated above, it is apparent that economic progress may provide riches to both nations, which is the positive side of it, but the work pressure and time spent are not worth it for certain individuals, particularly in developed countries, which is the negative side of it. It also demonstrates that being affluent is not the only factor that contributes to people's pleasure in life; spending time with friends and family is equally important.