Some People Say that Government Should Break and Replace Historic Buildings with Modern Buildings IELTS Writing Task 2

Sayantani Barman

Sep 28, 2023

People can live & work anywhere they want to choose because of improved. IELTS Writing Task 2 is an IELTS writing task 2 question in which candidates must express their opinion. As candidates are requested to express their opinions, the topic People can live & work anywhere they want to choose because of improved IELTS Writing Task 2 must be handled with proper explanations & justifications. Thus, in order to support their point of view, adequate phrase structure, a grammatically correct approach, & logical explanations are required. People can live & work anywhere they want to choose because of improved. IELTS Writing Task 2 includes an introduction, body, & conclusion to assist applicants in achieving a strong IELTS writing score.

IELTS Writing Task 2 allows applicants to demonstrate their knowledge & opinions on the topic. The IELTS writing score is calculated using b& scores. The b& ratings vary from 0 to 9. Candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a wide range of themes because the topics are so broad.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Some people say that Government should break down all the historic building and replace them with modern buildings. Do you agree or disagree?

Band 8 IELTS Essay

Every country's monuments and historic places are undeniably their history.

Surprisingly, some people believe it is undervalued and want the government to demolish it. These, in my opinion, are the most valuable assets of any country and should be treated with respect by residents.

To begin, in support of my hypothesis, each country has its own cultural history that demonstrates ancient civilization. These historical sites are invaluable and irreplaceable. This is the only way to educate future generations about our forefathers and their sacrifices.

Furthermore, visiting these areas will allow us to learn from our forefathers' mistakes and suggest a better path of action.

Furthermore, these areas represent the government's primary source of revenue.

Tourists visit many locations, and their spending helps the government enhance the country's infrastructure. Furthermore, tourists exhibit an interest in acquiring handcraft, which leads to the creation of a small-scale economy. It boosts the flow of foreign funds. Above all, it is obvious that tourists' visits lead to excellent connection among people all over the world.

Finally, I believe that protecting historical sites means saving the country's history. It is crucial because of the numerous benefits it provides to current and future generations.

Band 7.5 IELTS Essay

Many people have advocated that monumental constructions should be dismantled to make place for the construction of new ones. I completely disagree with this notion since I consider conserving famous structures as both evidence of our cultural heritage and a source of cash for the government.

One reason I oppose the idea of establishing new buildings in place of old is that historic structures represent evidence of our varied cultures. The stories that surround their existence help us remember our roots. Furthermore, these stories have been passed down from generation to generation, assisting in the reflection, preservation, and maintenance of our legacy. However, eliminating these historical landmarks will only contribute to the potential of faded history. In Nigeria, for example, the famed slave home has been retained over the years, and this house has legends and myths concerning the slave trade that are repeated to people.

Another argument for disagreeing with the viewpoint is that old constructions can provide the government with additional cash. This is accomplished by transforming these historical sites into tourist destinations that will undoubtedly attract visitors from all over the world who will be more than eager to pay any admission fees. For example, the iconic Egyptian pyramid, which has been standing for generations, attracts millions of visitors each year. Tourist entry ticket sales contribute significantly to Egypt's national income.

To summarize, the benefits of preserving historic structures, such as increased public revenue and evidence of cultural existence, are reasons why I vehemently oppose their replacement with modern structures.

Band 7 IELTS Essay

Our ancestors' excellent effort is reflected in historic architecture. It's proof of their existence and the enormous human architectural capacity. Recently, there have been discussions on how the government should demolish all of the ancestral structures and replace them with a new city plan. This essay will examine why classic constructions should be preserved with other modern structures throughout the metropolis and native towns.

Though the grandeur of the antique constructions is appealing to the eye, some experts say that demolishing these houses will greatly benefit the city. This is because it interferes with the current town planning. For example, if Delhi's ancient sites were reconstructed with a new city plan, the city's horrible traffic would be reduced. Also, because the upkeep of these wonder towers is expensive, it is advisable to bulldoze them. The upkeep of these national treasures would cost a fortune in terms of staff salary, human resource management, cleaning, and so on. Though some people believe that preserving these structures would be beneficial, the benefits of doing so outweigh the disadvantages.

Aged buildings add a lot of value to the areas where they were created. Many people are opposed to destroying such legacy. The reason for this is that they enhance the beauty of the city. I.e., many tourists appear to be mesmerized just by the global heritages established across the city. One such example is people traveling from all over India to visit the tall towers of Mumbai's Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus Railway Station, which is a UNESCO World Heritage site, as opposed to observing the landscape of modern art, which isn't for everyone. Furthermore, the brilliance in loving our forefathers' creative abilities is fulfilling for the public to enjoy for future generations. Another example is the carvings in India's southern state temples, where each sculpture defines our creators' artistic ability. When compared to the cost of constructing modern buildings, this is incomparable. Because these monuments will never be replicated in human history, it is prudent to conserve them.

To summarize, ancient infrastructure should be saved and preserved for future generations to study and appreciate the components of splendor that our forefathers left behind as a gift to us. This demonstrates how strongly I oppose allowing the government to demolish all ancient structures in order to rebuild them with new generation towers.

Check IELTS Writing Task 2 Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show