Some People Prefer One-On-One Lessons, While Others Prefer Groups IELTS Writing Task 2

First and foremost, it is essential and critical to have a solid comprehension of the subject as it is listed on the syllabus. One teacher to one student was seen as the best way of instruction in the conventional schooling system. And this technique might help students feel more at ease when learning a particular subject. An 80% success rate in exam performance was reported by schools with a one-to-one student-to-teacher ratio. According to a study from Harvard University published in 2019. Therefore, it is crucial for pupils to receive face-to-face instruction with the committed teacher.

On the other hand, economically unstable nations cannot afford one teacher for every pupil. As a result, the schools must adhere to a system of group debates and common deliberation. Despite the fact that classes fill up quickly, there are still many advantages. Including the possibility of helping introverted students who are reluctant to express questions. Because they all have unique problems to tackle. Additionally, it saves time, money, and space and allows candidates to develop their social and emotional stability. As well as learn more about teamwork and friendship. According to a recent survey published in The Times of India, 90% of pupils who learned in interpersonal group settings with common faculties are social. And are better able to handle obstacles later in life than the lone student. Additionally, solitary students are much more likely to consider suicide due to exam stress than are students who are more socially active. Because of this, the combined educational system has a clear benefit over the individual course.

The common study facility is an effective way to deal with the economic crisis. And it also greatly aids the candidate's social, emotional, and intellectual development.

On the one hand, some people like to learn in groups since it encourages communication, group learning, and peer motivation for achievement. In other words, these people think that talking to one other in a group setting in class helps them learn more about topics they might not be familiar with. For instance, before entering college, my brother struggled with mathematics. However, as soon as he began taking college courses, his grasp of the topic significantly improved. He attributed this improvement to discussing ideas with peers who were more knowledgeable than he was. Additionally, business education encourages peer competitiveness, which has a favorable effect on students' motivation to succeed.

However, some people prefer one-on-one instruction since there are fewer distractions involved. To be clear, the effect of noise pollution from classmates makes it difficult for persons with short attention spans. Or those who have Attention Deficit Syndrome (ADH) to stay focused. By the sound of a vocal note coming from any direction, these persons are readily distracted. For example, research has shown that personal lecturing improves academic performance or learning for 99 percent of patients with such illnesses. Furthermore, in order to maintain concentration throughout a learning period and achieve great performance, face-to-face instruction is essential.

In conclusion, I believe that people may have different preferences. They would have a higher chance of succeeding in school if they worked with others and learned in groups.

On the one hand, individual sessions greatly accelerate students' growth. The teacher gives each student in these classes his or her undivided attention. They are able to ask as many questions as they like and receive prompt, in-depth responses as a result. Student tried to understand a particular typing by developing his\her own perspective. Each individual has a different mode of information processing senses. Some might be able to learn better through auditory information while others might feel comfortable with visual information. In individual sessions a person tries to use a method suitable for him\he according to preferences. In contrast, because the teacher must attend to each student individually in group sessions. Which frequently have at least a dozen students, such possibilities are uncommon for each student.

Additionally, in one-on-one sessions, teachers can pinpoint students' unique strengths and weaknesses and create a lesson plan that works for them. Group sessions don't really lend themselves to this.

It is however clear why some students favor group classes. One-on-one tutoring is commonly considered to be extremely expensive, and only a small number of students can afford it. Group sessions, however, cost less. Additionally, there are some distinct benefits to taking a class alongside other students. This makes it possible for each student to assess how they are doing in relation to their peers. In this manner, when kids lag behind their peers, they will be inspired to work more.

Both of these educational approaches, in my opinion, have their own intrinsic benefits. And students should base their decisions on their personal circumstances. Rather than mindlessly following others. Since I am on a tight budget, I choose group classes.