Some People Believe that Eventually All Jobs Will be Done by Artificially Intelligent Robots IELTS Writing Task 2

Artificial robots might be better candidates than humans for tasks demanding the same standard. Robots may be taught to carry out repetitive tasks, which makes them the ideal industrial task force to adhere to stringent quality standards. For instance, in the Japanese catering business, machines handle the majority of the fast food production processes. As a result, each frozen meal has the same flavour and appearance. Therefore, it is expected that many comparable tasks may eventually be performed by robots.

Jobs that require human creativity, however, might be challenging for machines to complete. The ability of a human to understand and communicate news concepts is unique; programming cannot imitate it. By studying humanity and delivering it in a story, great authors have touched the emotions of millions of people. Likewise, when artists interact with their audience through paintings or sculptures, the feeling reverberates in our hearts. Robots could not create works of art like "Crime and Punishment" or "Starry Night,". Even if we programmed them with the most extensive vocabulary or the best art-making methods. This explains why technology will never fully replace humans in some areas.

In conclusion, it is anticipated that robots would eventually dominate a number of occupations. Robots are excellent at repetitive labour; nevertheless, they may struggle with professions that call for creativity. In the end, fewer professions may still be immune to robot takeover compared to the majority of robot employment in the future.

First of all, running and maintaining robots is very expensive. This is a compelling argument for why employers should continue to favour people over machines. For instance, it took about $1 million USD to install a robot in a grocery store in Khartoum. It will take decades for the robot to provide services that are worthwhile. Companies will also need to hire qualified operators to maintain these gadgets' continual operation. Human workers will become even more necessary in the job market and their operating costs will rise as a result.

Additionally, some occupations call for a personal touch. Robots, for example, are incapable of doing well in fields like health, engineering, or social work. Because they lack the capacity to comprehend human emotions, needs, and desires. Another problem that discourages the widespread use of robots is unemployment. People would lose their jobs if robots are used in every industry. As is well known, unemployment has a negative impact on society. The government may even enact legislation requiring businesses to hire humans rather than machines in order to avoid this catastrophe.

In conclusion, while robots may become smarter, I still believe that they will never entirely replace people in the workforce. Certain industries, of course, can only use robots. Humans will continue to work in other fields.

First off, ever more machines are taking the place of people in industries like production and defence. The adoption of such robots is inevitable due to their precision, programmability, speed, and other attributes. Especially the ones that are impractical for humans to acquire. It is inevitable despite the potentially high cost of deployment. Examples can be found in the electronics assembly lines, where after each task, the equipment is reprogrammed for a different product. Robots are also more productive than people, which helps to reduce production costs and increase profitability. For instance, building a microprocessor requires both consistency in accuracy and speed. It is impossible to accomplish manually and could be quite expensive. It makes sense that as technology develops, robot capabilities will expand along with their restrictions.

Also, even though they are able to execute well, it would not be possible for robots to replace humans in occupations requiring mental abilities. Specifically, testing food things, scents, the ability to debate or conduct research, and so on. Humans will be required, for example, to conduct managerial seminars or to restore the essential parts of a hovering spacecraft. Therefore, it becomes evident that humans will still be required for some tasks in the future. But their function will be rather limited.

To sum up, despite the fact that it seems like the value of robots will improve dramatically. I think human intervention will be necessary to get over their limitations. As a result, there is no doubt that humans will continue to hold the majority of employment.