Some People Believe That Children Should Do What Their Parents Tell Them To Do IELTS Writing Task 2

First off, because a child's intellect is too undeveloped, parents should always be listened to. Children lack the maturity to distinguish between good and wrong, and the majority of the time they end up going against their better judgement. Since at that age, they are drawn to engaging in these activities that negatively impact their lives.

A global study team, for instance, used a few questions to administer a few exams to children between the ages of 9 and 16. 85% of the children had a history of poor decisions, it was discovered. Therefore, it is advantageous to have parents watch their children. A child's capacity to handle circumstances on their own will be destroyed if they experience this too frequently.

On the other hand, trusting one's own judgement promotes originality, a characteristic that is essential in life. Having parents involved constantly when a child is growing up may prevent them from being able to handle problems on their own as adults.

Furthermore, children who are encouraged to be unique become more self-assured, capable of defending their rights. Moreover, they are also able to scale greater heights in life. Children who advocated for themselves in the past have been shown to be more successful than those who did not. This demonstrates the value of teaching kids to listen to themselves.

To summarise, while adhering to parental orders will aid you in making the proper decisions, doing so for an extended period of time will undermine your aims. Therefore, for a brighter future, every young person should trust their own judgement.

The ideal parenting, in the eyes of parents who wish to exert rigorous control over their kids, is to do so. This approach to parenting has undoubtedly got certain advantages. The vast expertise of parents may first and foremost be advantageous to children. Parents will typically be able to make better selections since they have more knowledge than youngsters do. The disadvantages of this strategy are mixed, though. Time has changed, for one thing.

The first is that times have changed. The difficulties that our children encounter now are very different from those that we experienced when we were their age. As a result, under the current situation, it is not very likely that parents will always make the appropriate choices.

In contrast, when kids are encouraged to think for themselves, they gain self-assurance that will serve them well as they get older. When faced with a difficulty, for instance, youngsters who are capable of autonomous thought would choose to come up with a solution. They will do so on their own rather than seek assistance from others.

The opposite is also true. Youngsters who are accustomed to being told what to do are reluctant to take initiative. However, when faced with challenges at work or in their personal lives, turn to their parents for support. Which of these two groups of children will go on to succeed in life is evidently not difficult to predict.

Children who think and act autonomously have superior problem-solving abilities and confidence. This will assist them much when they encounter issues in life, compared to children who are constantly taught what to do. This is why I think it's important to foster children's independence of thought.

To begin with, a child's immaturity as an intellectual being is the main justification for paying attention to parents. Because they lack the maturity to distinguish between good and bad, children usually select the latter. Since they are naturally inclined to do so at that age, ruining their lives in the process.

85 percent of youngsters in a certain age range were found to be prone to making bad judgments after extensive study was undertaken worldwide. As a result, it is preferable for parents to watch over their children. Additionally, by methodically outlining their learning, teachers should shield these kids from making errors that they have already made. Further also restrict them from having witnessed others do. It makes sense to let parents lead their kids up to a certain age. Further, after which they will be able to judge right from wrong based on what their parents have taught them.

Others contend that acting on one's judgement encourages individualism, a virtue in life.

People who adhere to this philosophy contend that kids should be given the freedom to discover life on their own. Moreover, make mistakes along the way to learning and development. Constant parental involvement throughout a child's formative years may prevent them from later on in life being able to solve their own difficulties. To sum up, while following parental rules might help kids make the greatest choices, doing so for a long time can damage their aspirations. For the sake of a better future, every young person beyond a certain age should trust their own judgement.