Some Governments Control The Number Of Children Someone Can Have Through Taxes IELTS Writing Task 2

On the one hand, some specialists contend that birth control laws must be updated for the present day. According to this theory, a large population will add to the social, economic, and maybe administrative burdens on society. States believe that if there is increased demand from childbirth, the issue can be resolved by raising income. Thus, a greater human population results in more infrastructure development, food production, security personnel, and deforestation. Future community estimates must be taken into account by governments, who rely entirely on mechanisms like taxes and economic restraints.

Contrarily, limiting families' ability to have children by taxation and financial instruments is ineffective. According to some analysts, tight population restrictions will have a negative impact. Additionally, the law's pressure on birth rates compels people to choose the gender of their children. For instance, if we consider China, families there had favored boys over girls due to the possibility of future financial gain. If the civil unrest is not put an end to, every limit on human life could get worse.

This essay concluded by arguing that in order to regulate childbirth's impact on families. Governments must make good decisions about what they want and what they decide. These laws are occasionally required, but they frequently work against the states. My opinion is that before enacting regulations, particularly. Those that deal with a person's life or death, governments must reach a peace accord with their people.

Due to the large population, there are many issues that arise, including poverty, unemployment, crime, and illiteracy. Every nation has finite resources, and if the population grows faster than allowed, those resources are quickly depleted. Thus, I concur that a government must occasionally employ draconian measures to maintain population control. One of these harsh measures can be limiting access to a facility to people. Who have more children than allowed or imposing a high tax burden on them as a result of their huge family size.

The nations with the largest populations worldwide are China and India. Both countries' populations were expanding quickly in the 1970s. And China established a stringent one-child policy in an effort to slow this growth. As a result, their population growth rate has significantly decreased to 0.6% a year, while India proposed the 2-child policy but did not enact it. It attempted to inform the public of the advantages of small families and provide rewards for them.

To sum up, I believe it is crucial that a nation's population is proportionate to its resources and total area. In order to achieve this ideal balance, the government may occasionally need to step in and impose regulations to control the population. Such as taxing those who help the population grow even further.

First of all, taxing parents who have more children than the law allows will persuade people in the proper way. It will compel families from the lower and middle classes to have fewer kids. This decision will also have an impact on wealthy parents because they won't want to spend their money on taxes for additional children. The government can fund public welfare programs with the money thus gathered.

For instance, a couple in Nigeria is supposed to have a maximum of four children. In the case of the family mentioned above. Since their income is taxed, which lowers their monthly income, they would have to think twice before they planned to have another baby. Because the cost of raising a child from conception until the age of eighteen, when they could support themselves, can be shocking.

Taxing every second or third child will also help people understand the impact population growth is having on society. Parents will understand that having more children threatens their financial stability and the nation's economy. Additionally, this method of population control seems kinder. Campaigns to raise awareness of population issues, celebrity endorsements. And educational initiatives in schools are examples of fairly weak and ineffectual measures. However, extreme measures like forced sterilization and a rigid one child policy may anger the populace.

In conclusion, I think taxing children who are older than the legal age is a sensible and practical way to slow population increase. It will send the message that a family can only afford to have more children on their own terms.