Significant Increase in Number of Oil Drilling Operations in Remote Locations IELTS Writing Task 2

Sayantani Barman

Apr 12, 2024

Significant Increase in Number of Oil Drilling Operations in Remote Locations IELTS Writing Task 2 is an essay topic that has 3 sample answers. The topic of the IELTS Writing Task 2 discusses a significant Increase in the Number of Oil Drilling Operations in Remote Locations. The candidate has to talk about both views. So, to support the point, proper sentence structure, a grammatically correct approach, and reasonable explanations are necessary.

IELTS Writing Task 2 includes an introduction, body, & conclusion to assist applicants in achieving a good score in the writing section. Candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a wide range of themes. In Globalization Studying Abroad is the Best Way to AttainWell Paid Job IELTS Writing Task 2 because the topics are broad.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of oil drilling operations in remote locations around the world. This has brought economic benefits to some countries, though it has also raised concerns about the environmental impact of these operations.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Band 8 IELTS Essay

There's continuous talk about whether or not countries ought to bore for oil in inaccessible areas. Whereas a few contend that it is fundamental to meet our ever-increasing vitality requests, I would side with those who fight that the potential natural harm to nearby communities exceeds any financial benefits.

On the one hand, penetrating oil in farther areas can encourage vitality generation. For example, the Cold National Natural life Asylum in Gold country is assessed to contain up to 12 billion barrels of oil, which seem to offer assistance to diminish America's reliance on remote oil. Other countries have comparable saves that can meet squeezing requests for the normal individual. The boring operations in these farther areas will at the same time make employment and stimulate economic development within the encompassing zone. As financial conditions progress, vitality needs will concomitantly rise and expanded penetrating can possibly make a cycle that benefits both local people and a given nation at huge.

On the other hand, drilling for oil in remote locations has critical natural results. The method of extracting oil can lead to the discharge of nursery gasses and other harmful toxins into the climate, contributing to climate change. For example, the Canadian oil sands, which are found in uninhabited zones of Alberta, are one of the biggest sources of nursery gas emanations within the world. Relatedly, boredom can have negative impacts on the wellbeing and prosperity of adjacent communities, particularly innate populaces. Within the above-mentioned illustration, a few of the oil has been extricated through the questionable home of fracking which sullies neighborhood water supplies where local populace rates are tall. 

In conclusion, whereas penetrating for oil in inaccessible areas may give brief financial benefits, the long-term costs to the environment and nearby communities are as well critical. Instep, governments ought to prioritize the advancement of maintainable vitality sources that will offer assistance to guarantee a cleaner, more advantageous future for all. 

Band 7.5 IELTS Essay

It is certainly genuine that a part of nations within the world right presently are doing oil drilling operations, in spite of the fact that it may be profitable the potential peril can't be neglected. In this exposition, I'll examine both sides of the contention in detail and give proof as to why the moment's conclusion is predominant.

On one hand, it is well-known that the wealthiest nations within the world are oil makers; in this manner, in the event that a nation finds oil saves interior its surface, that would be great news for it since the money picked up from offering oil and gas would offer assistance this specific nation pay its obligations as well as overhaul its framework. As a result, the nation would thrive with financial development, for occurrence, the quality of life in Qatar was so much after the disclosure of gas there. Besides, another pick up is the enhancement of job prospects for the reason that such operations would certainly make tons of work openings; hence, the rate of unemployment within the country will diminish.

On the other hand, it would hinder the environment in the long run, as the sum of gas outflows and carbon dioxide within the discussion will increase significantly, putting the lives of the citizens in great danger. Besides, such operations do not put into thought the security of wildlife, for example, in Algeria, most of the Sahara creatures are terminated when the operation of oil boring starts. I completely bolster this side, I would contend that the expected threats are more noteworthy than the potential benefits.

To conclude, there are persuading contentions both for and against oil penetrating; in any case, I accept that the negative result exceeds the positive one 

Band 7 IELTS Essay

The created nations have endeavored to set up oil industry zones that can get a colossal sum of cash over the world. In spite of the fact that the coordinates of oil operations can improve the economy by collaboration with enabled countries, it may lead to a negative effect on the environment. I will investigate both sides of the sea and my position in advance passages.

On the one side, the staying industry makes a gigantic sum of job opportunities for innate individuals that will lead to a rising work rate within the nation. Due to the rise of government income, remote companies have contributed to this viewpoint. Moreover, by holding the nearby generation of the oil industry, citizens seem to reduce tax rates on it and utilize a bounty of amounts without stressing around costs instead of other countries, for occurrence. This way can posture the adjustment between the destitution and wealthy groups as a result of applying fuel with cheap costs for their trade and day by day commute vehicles.

On the other side, senator and huge organizations ought to consider natural debasement as a need issue, particularly, climate change, contamination, and contaminants of ozone layers. Oil plants make a controlling sum of benefits for developing society sectors, such as free instructive materials, open wellbeing centers, and modernized transportation framework, discharging chemical substances as a gigantic smoke into the climate. Subsequently, dry season, deforestation, less drinkable water, and overwhelming snow conditions are being confronted gravely in all countries over the globe. In this way, downsides of natural results that can be postured by diesel, gas, and fuel plants ought to be forced, like setting restrain rules to become a sound planet for the next generations.

In conclusion, most developing countries rely on oil operations as an imperative trade so that it gives open needs. Be that as it may, the world of human living significance ought to be considered a need issue to subsist long-term with a solid life on the planet which I wholeheartedly concur. 

Check – IELTS Writing Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show