Scientists say that in the Future Humanity will Speak the Same Language IELTS Writing Task 2

Scientists say that in the Future Humanity will Speak the Same Language IELTS Writing Task 2 consists of three sample answers provided below. The task requires the candidates to provide a tentative and argumentative answer to the question. The sample answers comprise two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description of the topic. The body contains argumentative statements and tentative answers to support the test-taker's perspective.
IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers

Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?

Model Answer 1:

The omnipresence of a few languages throughout the world has led to the expectation that in the future, everyone would speak the same language. Although this tendency has certain advantages, I feel the disadvantages are considerable.

On the one hand, a universal vernacular may aid in the elimination of linguistic barriers, allowing people from all over the world to communicate more effectively and efficiently. Many sectors, including corporate transactions, international collaboration, and tourism expansion, have benefited from this progress. Entrepreneurs, for example, may successfully market their products and solutions directly to local people without the need for a third party, resulting in the quick expansion of their firm, and more precisely, the profit.

Furthermore, without any linguistic barriers, countries may collaborate with one another, transforming the globe into a global community with a plethora of previously unimaginable options.

The single dialect system, on the other hand, has negative consequences all across the world. Several global local languages are dwindling as a result of over-reliance on a single vernacular, which might lead to the extinction of many cultures and national identities.

Many Vietnamese local customs, for example, are on the verge of extinction; the introduction of a standard communication method hastens the process, resulting in the obliteration of an entire culture. As a result, people may recognise that their first languages are obsolete and that there is no need to conserve or transmit them to future generations.

A language defines a culture. It inherently makes a person understand their heritage. A person’s culture should never be let go. It is necessary to bring it forward so that we understand our history and our roots. A country like India is home to over 30+ languages. We must keep languages and traditions alive and pass them on to our future generations. It is always good to learn new languages even in terms of employment. It helps in a person’s growth both personally and professionally.

To summarise, the universal speaking system requires nations to grow their economies and equalize their inhabitants; nevertheless, the negative consequences of this strategy may result in a slew of difficulties, including the destruction of countries' traditions and cultural variety. A country's essential identity, in my opinion, should not be jeopardized.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Articles

Check: IELTS Actual Test ebooks Combo

Model Answer 2:

Globalization is advancing on our planet. With so many factors in mind, academics predict that in the next age, everyone on the planet will speak the same mother tongue, regardless of their ethnic or religious views. This, in my opinion, is critical to globalize the globe. To show points and substantiate assertions, this article will use examples from an Oxford University study and a Time Magazine poll to discuss this scenario.

To begin with, the unification of mother tongues will facilitate communication. Some research publications are currently particularly tough to grasp due to their complex wording. Furthermore, to qualify for a certain institution in a specific country, students must complete a variety of language courses. For example, Oxford University performed a study on global education systems in 2016 and discovered that the majority of students dropped out of academic institutions because they were unable to bridge the communication gap between instructors and students due to their poor command of the language.

As can be seen from the above, a single language system is a pressing requirement.

Second, proponents of a cultural language system argue that unifying the world's speaking system and forcing everyone to speak in the same way will undermine a society's cultural values. However, this is only an assumption; in actuality, it will allow the world to learn more about other cultures. Furthermore, we will have a better understanding of the world's lost civilizations, which we are unable to learn about since they are of local importance.

Similarly, a 2016 study by Time Magazine demonstrates that 60% of people reject the concept that a single language system will undermine society's standards if it is implemented globally. People are in favor of a worldwide speaking system, as seen by this example.

To summarise, linguistic globalization undoubtedly generates skepticism among those who are ignorant of the system's benefits. And I am pleased with the current state of linguistic globalization. When individuals grasp the necessity of globalization, we will see significant advantages in the future.

Model Answer 3:

Many people have discussed the problem of having such a huge number of languages all across the world. As a result, experts make a variety of forecasts and assumptions regarding the emergence of a universal language that people will want to use in the future. It is, in my opinion, a beneficial trend that will lead to fewer international disputes and simpler educational applications.

One significant benefit of this development is that it will minimize the number of global misconceptions, reducing disputes and war across continents. To put it another way, by speaking the same language, the representatives of the nations will attempt to explain the situation to their colleagues rather than making snap decisions. For example, rather than communicating through interpreters, direct conversation amongst leaders will lead to a range of alternative solutions.

Another advantage is that the process of foreign schooling will be less complex than ever before. It effectively means that, as a result of the international language, higher education applications will no longer require mastery of a single language. As a result, due to the lack of the need to pass expensive tests, it may be a more inexpensive option for students all over the world.

On the other hand global-local, this evolution may have a significant negative influence on national cultures. It is self-evident that most countries are attempting to preserve their forefathers' legacy through speaking local languages and maintaining customs and traditions. As a result of establishing a single language, each country will become more similar to one another, understanding that they have nothing to maintain their individuality.

To summarise the aforementioned points, while one global language may result in continents losing significant cultures that represent their experiences, I believe it is beneficial to promote this idea because people from all countries will be able to find compromise in specific areas and will be able to easily enter universities abroad.