Safety Standards are Important When Building People’s Homes IELTS Writing Task 2

Others, on the other hand, think that homeowners ought to be held responsible. I think the government has a part to play in making and enforcing laws, but the people who build houses are the ones who have to make sure the safety standards have been met. I'll explain my views in the essay that follows.

To begin with, the government has a very important role to play because it is their duty to enact regulations and safety measures, and to make sure that these rules are carefully followed by those who construct homes. Even though it lacks the power to name the necessary officials or set up a monitoring system to oversee the construction, the government can still evaluate the procedure to make sure that the set procedures are being followed. Government should impose sanctions in the event of noncompliance because it is responsible for enforcing the law.

Homeowners should also make sure that their home was constructed in accordance with the minimum safety standards, governmental laws, and material requirements. By following safety regulations for things like electrical wiring specifications, foundation strength, building strength, and the use of water-resistant materials when building homes, they should try to create a safe environment. The homeowners should also get approval from higher-ups in the government and build their homes in accordance with the appropriate safety codes and permit requirements. If an accident does happen accidentally as a result of improper tool and material use, inexperienced laborers, or excessive haste, the home owner will be held accountable.

In conclusion, homeowners are required to build homes in line with these standard engineering criteria and comply with the building codes since the government is responsible for enforcing severe construction codes. This is done to ensure their personal safety. To make sure that the safety criteria are being met, the authorities should examine construction zones frequently.

Governments are responsible for enforcing the laws. Even in a cooperative or apartment building, many co-owners may be harmed if they fail to adhere to building codes. The building codes are a set of guidelines for the design, construction, materials, and other aspects of a building's design and construction. Even in earthquake-prone areas, buildings should not be too high and the design must be more earthquake-resistant. Dilatation is required for large and lengthy buildings so that only a portion of a building collapses in a strong earthquake, not the entire structure. Construction and electrical wiring, as well as the connection to gas, must meet minimal safety criteria.

Fire extinguishers are essential in establishments such as factories, halls, discos, and party centres, as are adequate entry and exit facilities. A fire-resistant paint must be applied to wood in wooden houses. There are rubber and steel fire barriers installed in major housing complexes, business buildings, halls, and hotel lobbies to keep a fire from spreading. Skylights should not be utilised in places where hailstorms occur frequently, and if they are, they should be protected by steel shutters.

As a result, people's lives are put in jeopardy by many construction companies who disregard basic safety rules in order to save money. Many private housewives aren't familiar with the specifics of these safety procedures and industry regulations. It is the government's job to communicate this crucial information and to oversee the compliance of builders, developers, and manufacturers of houses. Even if they could, the builders are ultimately responsible for their work. Governments are ultimately accountable for the safety and well-being of their citizens in our modern society. Astringent construction code also falls under the government's jurisdiction. The government shall be held liable if any government agency's incompetence endangers the lives of its citizens.

Others believe that the government bears the brunt of the burden. This write-up will cover both sides of the argument. To begin, the most cost-effective alternative is taken into consideration when building houses for persons with lower incomes. When looking for ways to save costs, they almost always look at sacrificing quality in terms of materials and construction. Ultimately, this results in subpar house construction that may not even meet the most basic safety regulations.

As an example, even a small amount of rain has resulted in houses being washed away on more than one occasion. Minor tremors have also contributed to the collapse of entire buildings in the past. It is also possible to cause a fire by cutting corners on the quality of the electrical wiring, which can have a devastating effect on the entire neighborhood. The problem can be solved, in my opinion, by establishing a regulating agency to keep an eye on the quality of construction projects. The government should be in charge of the regulating agency. It is imperative that the safety requirements for building materials, as well as the materials that can and cannot be utilised, be clearly defined.

Among these are foundation strength, construction strength, electrical wiring specification, water-resistant material, and so forth. In addition, the owner must contact the authority for approval at various stages of construction. The authorities must conduct random audits before approving such requests. As well as creating a system, this would function as a deterrent to homeowners who are tempted to cut corners on the quality of their construction. Despite the fact that current house constructions pose a serious threat to society. There is an opportunity in this challenge to develop a system that would be both robust and effective. That will ensure that building constructions of the future adhere to the specified standards and are completely safe for both the owners and the general public.