Reasearch Committed a Crime IELTS Reading Answers

Sep 15, 2023

At Many Institutions IELTS Reading Answers is a general reading subject that explores Reasearch Committed a Crime.Reasearch Committed a Crime IELTS reading answers, have a total of thirteen questions. The specified topic generates a single type of question: True/False/Not Given. Candidates should read the IELTS Reading passage thoroughly in order to recognize synonyms, identify keywords, and answer the questions below. IELTS reading practice papers, which feature topics such as Research Committed a Crime IELTS Reading Answers. Candidates can use IELTS reading answers to enhance their performance in the reading section.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1

Read the Passage to Answer the Following Questions

RESEARCH COMMITTED A CRIME

At the start of the 20th century, Scotland Yard's fingerprint bureau began a quiet revolution in policing. A hundred years on, detectives have a new tool at their disposal in the form of DNA matching. In 1995 the government set up a national database recording the DNA of everyone who was convicted of a crime, hoping that it would make future cases easier to crack. Since then the England and Wales database has swollen to 5.5m entries, covering 4.8m citizens, some profiles are duplicates, or some 9% of the population. It is thought to be the biggest DNA database in the world. Despite plans announced this week to limit its growth, it looks likely to stay that way.
The reason for the database's size is that since 2004 it has included not just those convicted of crimes but those who have been merely arrested. As far as police are concerned, the bigger the pool, the more chance of a match with their next crime scene. But the inclusion of people who have never committed a crime has been controversial. Up to a million of those in the database do not have a conviction. Chief constables have the discretion to remove profiles if they choose, but that seldom happens. One MP, Diane Abbott, is running surgeries to show her constituents how to appeal. Still, only a few hundred profiles are deleted each year.
Last December the European Court of Human Rights ruled that holding so many innocent people's DNA records "could not be regarded as necessary in a democratic society". On November 11th the Home Office released plans to trim the number of people being included, a bit. People arrested and released will still have their DNA held, but only for six years. Under-18s in the same situation will stay on the database for three years.
As is now customary, the plans include tougher rules on terrorism: those cleared of terror offences could still have their DNA held indefinitely, subject to regular reviews. And the Home Office proposes to give the police the power to take DNA from people who have convictions pre-dating the database. No one knows how many are in this group, but the back catalog could inflate the database dramatically. Chris Sims, the chief constable with responsibility for the database, expects forces to use the power "proactively"
Whether the European Court will be satisfied with these tweaks remains to be seen. The opposition Conservatives say that if they win power at the approaching general election they will copy the Scottish system, in which people who are not convicted usually have their DNA removed from the database as soon as the case against them is dropped. Keeping the records of those who have done nothing wrong undermines the traditional presumption of innocence, the Tories say.
The government argues that shrinking the pool of people on the database means that fewer crimes will be solved. The Association of Chief Police Officers examined a set of homicide and rape cases from last ear in which a DNA match had been made with a profile on the national database. In about a tenth of these cases, the match was with someone who was on the database despite not having a conviction.
Home Office boffins justify the six-year retention of innocents' DNA with research showing that people who are let off after an arrest are more likely than the general public to be rearrested. Their likelihood of rearrest only drops back to average levels after six years, the number-crunchers found. Interestingly, juveniles take longer to return to a 'normal' risk profile than adults, leading Home Office scientists to note that there is a case for retaining their DNA for longer than that of adults, not shorter, as the government has decided.
High profile cases have made even liberal-minded folk think twice about limiting the size of the database. Last year Mark Dixie was jailed for a rape and murder that might never have been solved had he not had a DNA sample taken following his arrest, and subsequent release, over a pub brawl a few months later. The prospect of even a handful of killers evading justice will make it hard for any government to cut the database back much more.

Section 2

Questions 28 - 35
The text has eight paragraphs, A - H.
Choose the correct heading for each paragraph from the list of headings below.

28. i. Records of non-convicts helps

Answer: H
Supporting statement: “....had he not had a DNA sample taken following his arrest, and subsequent release, over a pub brawl a few months later.....”
Keywords:sample, brawl
Keyword location: para H
Explanation: It is clearly given that the DNA sample was the only way to get the criminal arrested. Hence we can assign it the title mentioning that the record of non convicts helps.

29. ii. On record without conviction

Answer: B
Supporting statement: “...Up to a million of those in the database do not have a conviction....”
Keywords: database, conviction
Keyword location: para B
Explanation: It is clearly mentioned in the B paragraph that the database contains names that don’t have a conviction. This clearly indicates that the above given title will be an appropriate one.

30. iii. Database is too large

Answer: D
Supporting statement: “...No one knows how many are in this group, but the back catalog could inflate the database dramatically....”
Keywords: catalog, inflate
Keyword location: para D
Explanation: It can be seen in the passage D that no one actually knows how many people are in the database. It clearly indicates that the database is very large and could not be read manually.

31. iv. Hardly democratic

Answer: E
Supporting statement: “...The opposition Conservatives say that if they win power at the approaching general election they will copy the Scottish system....”
Keywords: win, scottish
Keyword location: para E
Explanation: The opposition people made a statement that they will win power at the approaching general election. They will implement the Scottish system which is hardly democratic government.

32.v. Previous offenders included

Answer: H
Supporting statement: “...Last year Mark Dixie was jailed for a rape and murder that might never have been solved had he not had a DNA sample taken following his arrest....”
Keywords: jailed, rape
Keyword location: para H
Explanation: It is clearly mentioned that Mark Dixie was a convict and he was jailed because of rape and murder case. He was jailed in the previous year because of the DNA samples.

33.vi. Database unlikely to be cut by much

Answer: A
Supporting statement: “....It is thought to be the biggest DNA database in the world. Despite plans announced this week to limit its growth, it looks likely to stay that way....”
Keywords: database, limit
Keyword location: para A
Explanation: It is mentioned that the database is the biggest DNA database in the world. It is also said that the database is going to be that way for a while.

34.vii. Against the idea of innocence

Answer: C
Supporting statement: “....Human Rights ruled that holding so many innocent people's DNA records "could not be regarded as necessary in a democratic society"....”
Keywords: innocent, democratic
Keyword location: para C
Explanation: It was a logical statement that the innocent people’s DNA record should not be stored. It is not a good idea in a democratic society. Hence this idea could be regarded against the idea of innocence.

35.vili. The largest of its kind

Answer: F
Supporting statement: “....The government argues that shrinking the pool of people on the database means that fewer crimes will be solved....”
Keywords: shrinking, crimes
Keyword location: para F
Explanation: The database was the largest database of the country. And the government claimed that shrinking the database will not be a good sign for catching criminals.

36.ix. Higher chance of being arrested again

Answer: G
Supporting statement: “... Home Office boffins justify the six-year retention of innocents' DNA with research showing that people who are let off after an arrest are more likely than the general public to be rearrested....”
Keywords: research, arrest
Keyword location: para G
Explanation: It is said that the people who committed crimes are more likely to repeat the crime than the general public. So it can be said that the guy who is already convicted for a crime has a chance of being arrested again.

Questions 36 - 40
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS for each answer.

The European Court of Human Rights believes that having non convicts on the database is ......
Chris Sims thinks that the ................ should have a proactive approach to using the database.
In Scotland, innocent people's DNA records are removed when the case ............
The time needed for young people to return to normal risk profile is .................. for adults.
Mark Dixie was convicted as a result if a DNA sample taken after a …………

36.

Answer: Not Necessary
Supporting statement: “... Human Rights ruled that holding so many innocent people's DNA records "could not be regarded as necessary in a democratic society"....”
Keywords: innocent, regarded
Keyword location: para C
Explanation: It is mentioned in the para C that storing innocent people DNA record could not be regarded as necessary.

37.

Answer: Forces
Supporting statement: “...Chris Sims, the chief constable with responsibility for the database, expects forces to use the power "proactively"....”
Keywords: constable, forces
Keyword location: para D, line 4
Explanation: It is written in the paragraph D.

38.

Answer: Is Dropped
Supporting statement: “...people who are not convicted usually have their DNA removed from the database as soon as the case against them is dropped.....”
Keywords:
Keyword location: para E, line 3-4
Explanation: It is written in paragraph E and line 3

39.

Answer: Longer Than
Supporting statement: “..Interestingly, juveniles take longer to return to a 'normal' risk profile than adults,....”
Keywords: juveniles, adults
Keyword location: para G, line 3-4
Explanation: It is given in para G that the young people take longer time to return to normal risk.

40.

Answer: Pub Brawl
Supporting statement: “.... jailed for a rape and murder that might never have been solved had he not had a DNA sample taken following his arrest, and subsequent release, over a pub brawl a few months later...”
Keywords: arrest, brawl
Keyword location: para H, line 2-3
Explanation: He was arrested in a pub brawl for the murder and rape case.

Check IELTS reading samples