Rapid Police Response IELTS Reading Answers
In the IELTS exam, reading skills play a vital role in scoring a high band. The IELTS Reading skills are checked with 40 questions of different types such as matching heading, sentence formation, true false not given and so on for 60 minutes. The IELTS Reading section would assess students’ effectiveness in reading skills focusing on their grammar and vocabulary. IELTS Academic reading requires students to focus on a given passage based on which they need to respond to the corresponding questions. Students need to consider IELTS Reading practice papers as part of their preparation for this section. The solutions and explanations for Rapid Police Response IELTS Reading answers are discussed in this post. The type of questions asked in this passage is:
- True/False/Not Given Questions
Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now
Section 1
Read the Passage to Answer the Following Questions
Rapid Police Response IELTS Reading Answers
- Police departments in the United States and Canada see it as central to their role that they respond to calls for help as quickly as possible. This ability to react fast has been greatly improved with the aid of technology. The telephone and police radio, already long in use, assist greatly in the reduction of police response time. In more recent times there has been the introduction of the '911' emergency system, which allows the public easier and faster contact with police, and the use of police computer systems, which assist police in planning patrols and assigning emergency requests to the police officers nearest to the scene of the emergency.
- An important part of police strategy, rapid police response is seen by police officers and the public alike as offering tremendous benefits. The more obvious ones are the ability of police to apply first-aid life-saving techniques quickly and the greater likelihood of arresting people who may have participated in a crime. It aids in identifying those who witnessed an emergency or crime, as well as in collecting evidence. The overall reputation of a police department, too, is enhanced if a rapid response is consistent, and this in itself promotes the prevention of crime. Needless to say, rapid response offers the public some degree of satisfaction in its police force.
- While these may be the desired consequences of rapid police response, actual research has not shown it to be quite so beneficial. For example, it has been demonstrated that rapid response leads to a greater likelihood of arrest only if responses are in the order of 1-2 minutes after a call is received by the police. When response times increase to 3-4 minutes — still quite a rapid response — the likelihood of an arrest is substantially reduced. Similarly, in identifying witnesses to emergencies or crimes, police are far more likely to be successful if they arrive at the scene no more than four minutes, on average, after receiving a call for help. Yet both police officers and the public define 'rapid response' as responding up to 10-12 minutes after calling the police for help.
- Should police assume all the responsibility for ensuring a rapid response? Studies have shown that people tend to delay after an incident occurs before contacting the police. A crime victim may be injured and thus unable to call for help, for example, or no telephone may be available at the scene of the incident. Often, however, there is no such physical barrier to calling the police. Indeed, it is very common for crime victims to call their parents, their minister, or even their insurance company first. When the police are finally called in such cases, the effectiveness of even the most rapid of responses is greatly diminished.
- The effectiveness of rapid response also needs to be seen in the light of the nature of the crime. For example, when someone rings the police after discovering their television set has been stolen from their home, there is little point, in terms of identifying those responsible for the crime, in ensuring a very rapid response. It is common in such burglary or theft cases that the victim discovers the crime hours, days, even weeks after it has occurred. When the victim is directly involved in the crime, however, as in the case of a robbery, rapid response, provided the victim was quickly able to contact the police, is more likely to be advantageous. Based on statistics comparing crimes that are discovered and those in which the victim is directly involved, Spelman and Brown (1981) suggest that three in four calls to police need not be met with rapid response.
- It becomes clear that the importance of response time in collecting evidence or catching criminals after a crime must be weighed against a variety of factors. Yet because police department officials assume the public strongly demands a rapid response, they believe that every call to the police should be met with it. Studies have shown, however, that while the public wants a quick response, more important is the information given by the police to the person asking for help. If a caller is told the police will arrive in five minutes but in fact, it takes ten minutes or more, waiting the extra time can be extremely frustrating. But if a caller is told he or she will have to wait 10 minutes and the police indeed arrive within that time, the caller is normally satisfied. Thus, rather than emphasising rapid response, the focus of energies should be on establishing realistic expectations in the caller and making every effort to meet them.
Section 2
Solution and Explanation
Question 1-7:
Do the statements given reflect what the writer is trying to say in the passage? In boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet, write:
TRUE if the statement agrees with the given information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the given information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information given on statement
- Police believe there is a better chance of finding witnesses to a crime if the response is rapid.
Answer: TRUE
Supporting Sentence: It aids in identifying those who witnessed an emergency or crime, as well as in collecting evidence.
Keywords: Police, believe, finding, witnesses, crime, response, rapid
Keyword Location: Para 2, Line 4
Explanation: The passage mentions that if the response is fast, then the police find it much easier to find witnesses as well as evidence related to the crime. Therefore, the given statement is true.
Read More IELTS Reading Related Samples
- A response delay of 1-2 minutes may have a substantial influence on whether or not a suspected criminal is caught.
Answer: TRUE
Supporting Sentence: When response times increase to 3-4 minutes — still quite a rapid response — the likelihood of an arrest is substantially reduced.
Keywords: response, delay, 1-2minutes, substantial, influence, suspected, criminal, caught
Keyword Location: Para 3, Line 5
Explanation: The passage mentions that if the response time is delayed by even a few minutes, it becomes difficult to catch the criminal. Therefore, the given statement is true.
- The public and the police generally agree on the amount of time normally taken for a rapid response.
Answer: TRUE
Supporting Sentence: Yet both police officers and the public define 'rapid response' as responding up to 10-12 minutes after calling the police for help.
Keywords: Public, police, agree, amount, time, taken, rapid, response
Keyword Location: Para 3, Last 2 lines
Explanation: The passage mentions that no matter how many minutes police take to respond to emergency help calls, there is a stipulated time limit of 10-12minutes agreed upon by both the police and public as the rapid response. Hence, the given statement is true.
- Physical barriers are the greatest cause of delay in contacting the police.
Answer: FALSE
Supporting Sentence: Often, however, there is no such physical barrier to calling the police.
Keywords: Physical, barriers, greatest, cause, delay, contacting, police
Keyword Location: Para 4, Line 4
Explanation: The passage mentions that there are no physical barriers that cause the delay in contacting police such as an injured person being unable to call the police or there is a lack of telephone at the crime spot. Therefore, the given statement is false.
- Rapid response is considered desirable in handling cases of burglary.
Answer: FALSE
Supporting Sentence: For example, when someone rings the police after discovering their television set has been stolen from their home, there is little point, in terms of identifying those responsible for the crime, in ensuring a very rapid response.
Keywords: Rapid, response, considered, desirable, handling, cases, burglary
Keyword Location: Para 5, Line 5
Explanation: The passage mentions that rapid response is considered advantageous only when the victim informs the police quickly as in the cases of robbery, not burglary as mostly in such cases, victims themselves become aware very late. Therefore the given statement is false.
- Research shows that some 75% of crimes are discovered by victims after they have been committed.
Answer: TRUE
Supporting Sentence: Based on statistics comparing crimes that are discovered and those in which the victim is directly involved, Spelman and Brown (1981) suggest that three in four calls to police need not be met with rapid response.
Keywords: Research, 75% of crimes, discovered, victims, after, committed
Keyword Location: Para 5,
Explanation: The passage suggests that three in four calls need not be met with a rapid response as they are mostly the calls that are made much later than the time when the crime was committed. This gives us data that approximately 75% of the crimes are discovered after the crime has already taken place. Therefore, the given statement is true.
- Police departments are usually successful in providing a rapid response regardless of the circumstances of the crime or emergency.
Answer: NOT GIVEN
Comments