Pollution And Environmental Problems Cannot Be Avoided IELTS Writing Task 2

First, using environmentally friendly methods can also make development possible. There is no doubt that most countries are embracing the cheapest sources, like fossil fuels, for their convenience. On the other hand, they can employ renewable sources of energy, like solar panels, wind turbines, etc., to generate energy. Even while such resources are expensive to develop and maintain, they are pollution-free. For instance, economically prosperous countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Dubai. Adopt cutting-edge technologies by placing a higher priority on the environment than on the newest breakthroughs.

However, despite industrialization, a significant increase in tree planting can also aid in the eradication of issues with air pollution. In other words, a strong demand for technology might occasionally cause ecological issues. Because of the chimneys of various enterprises emitting harmful compounds like nitrous oxide, methane gas, etc. A dense mass of trees should be grown to reduce these negative effects of technology and improve air quality. According to a study by The Times India. The majority of wealthy nations are at the top of the list among those that are using environmentally friendly approaches. In the study of cutting-edge advancements.

Most people believed, in conclusion, that developing nations cannot become prosperous without endangering their environment. However, people can switch to an environmentally friendly technology. Like solar power plants, to create power in order to avoid the hazardous impacts of non-renewable resources. Additionally, the best strategy to prevent environmental harm in the present industrialization era is to grow a lot of trees.

First, anyone can see that pollution and environmental issues are more prevalent in developing nations than they are in developed nations. India and Bangladesh have much worse air, sound, and water pollution than wealthy nations like Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Additionally, the quantity of factories does not correspond to the pollution they produce.

Second, economic growth does not imply that a nation would have factories and industries spread out over the entire territory. Government planning and inspection can ensure that there is a minimum amount of gas and other dangerous element emissions into the water and air. Therefore, even though industrialization is necessary for a country's development. It does not follow that there will be no way to reduce pollution and environmental problems.

The appropriate enactment and enforcement of regulations can significantly reduce pollution, which is a global problem. While the natural causes of pollution cannot be stopped, human activity is responsible for a majority of environmental degradation. While the rapid pollution we witness today in many places has little to do with a nation's progress. We should educate people, encourage them, and impose stringent rules to protect our environment.

In conclusion, I would concur that industrialization and development have a negative impact on the environment to some level. However this is not the main cause of environmental pollution. To improve the environment and make the planet a better place for the next generation, we still have plenty of time and possibilities.

As countries grow, more resources will be needed. For instance, emerging nations like China and India require more petroleum to support their economic development. Unfortunately, over use of fossil fuels increases carbon dioxide emissions and the rate of global warming. However, this does not imply that these nations should be permitted to pollute in order to advance their growth. Naturally, they must grow, but the creation of sustainable energy sources is now more important than ever.

Investments in renewable and clean energy should be made by all nations. For instance, there is a lot of potential for harvesting solar energy in countries that are on either side of the equator. Countries that create more green energy than they need can sell it to other nations. Rich countries that are more developed in science. And technology should impart their technical know-how to poor and developing countries. So that they can benefit from newer, more environmentally friendly technologies for a better future.

It is absurd to argue that only governments that pollute should take action to address environmental issues because they affect all countries equally. Soon, the developed world will also be affected by the pollution that quickly developing countries are causing.

For a better future, wealthy countries should impart newer, more environmentally friendly technologies to underdeveloped and poorer countries.

Last but not least, environmental issues are not unique to any one nation, so it is illogical to assert that only polluting nations should take action. Soon, the developed world will also be affected by the pollution that quickly developing countries are causing.

As a result, we cannot overlook environmental issues under the justification that they are a byproduct of progress because our survival depends on it. Development is undoubtedly necessary, but it's time to reject development that devastates the environment.