People Have to Pay a Fee when they Drive their Cars into the City Centre IELTS Writing Task 2

Sep 29, 2023

People can live & work anywhere they want to choose because of improved. IELTS Writing Task 2 is an IELTS writing task 2 question in which candidates must express their opinion. As candidates are requested to express their opinions, the topic People can live & work anywhere they want to choose because of improved IELTS Writing Task 2 must be handled with proper explanations & justifications. Thus, in order to support their point of view, adequate phrase structure, a grammatically correct approach, & logical explanations are required. People can live & work anywhere they want to choose because of improved. IELTS Writing Task 2 includes an introduction, body, & conclusion to assist applicants in achieving a strong IELTS writing score.

IELTS Writing Task 2 allows applicants to demonstrate their knowledge & opinions on the topic. The IELTS writing score is calculated using b& scores. The b& ratings vary from 0 to 9. Candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a wide range of themes because the topics are so broad.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city center, in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.

Band 8 IELTS Essay

Most major cities across the world experience substantial traffic congestion, which often congests city centers and key areas. This congestion gives birth to a slew of new issues: problems that continue to grow. To demonstrate their commitment to solving this growing problem, the government implements a policy that taxes automobiles during specific hours when they enter these congested areas of the city. In this essay, we promise to examine both the positive and negative aspects; additionally, we will express our opinion: a balanced viewpoint based on rigorous investigation.

Implementing congestion charges will encourage people to use public transportation, resulting in fewer vehicles on the road, significantly lowering traffic congestion. Notably, this approach has a large positive impact: it helps cities reduce pollution and improve environmental health. Furthermore, the proceeds from these fees help to subsidize alternate modes of public transit; they also help to widen possibilities beyond driving.

An overemphasis on public transportation, on the other hand, could exacerbate the strain on our already overburdened infrastructure, potentially leading to fatalities. Congestion charges, which are enforced to reduce traffic and enhance environmental sustainability, may drive people to suburban shopping malls, potentially causing major financial loss for urban firms.

While the congestion charge is an admirable endeavor, it falls short of perfection. Rather than putting fees on vehicles entering the city, the government should shift its policy, initiating campaigns to promote carpooling or alternate modes of transportation, such as cycling.

Band 7.5 IELTS Essay

It is general knowledge that drivers in many cities must pay a fee to enter the city core. Because the basic goal of such charges is to reduce motor traffic on city streets, implementing regulations to achieve this effect remains mostly debatable—a decisive mix of pros and negatives affecting everyone in different ways. I'll explain my point of view by listing the reasons that support it as well as those that contradict it.

To begin, there are numerous well-known benefits to owning a car in the city; however, if cities implemented driving-related policies or rules - such as emission limits and parking restrictions - they could effectively mitigate widespread issues such as air pollution and traffic jams. A program like this would not only solve these difficulties, but it would also encourage more people to use public transit, which would help the government's attempts to use resources more efficiently. The public transportation industry is rapidly expanding; for example, in Tokyo, the city has developed a policy encouraging residents to drive personal vehicles into the city center. This policy stimulated Tokyo's substantial expansion, establishing it as one of the smartest cities; this accomplishment is important, as it boasts not just the lowest percentage of air pollution but also the least amount of traffic congestion. The city's public transportation expansion offers a clear picture: an advanced and sophisticated trend propelling urban progress. This example indicates clearly that policies provide several benefits to a community; they improve overall development and stimulate expansion in the public transportation business.

However, implementing fees has major consequences for a city: it has a significant impact on the car industry in various nations. With fewer automobiles being purchased nowadays--a trend that is producing income declines and stifling business development within the sector--this regulation exacerbates these negative consequences on the automotive industry. A situation persists in South Africa: persons must either pay a charge or meet particular tasks in order to drive their cars inside the city center. Approximately 65% of Cape Town residents choose not to purchase autos because they believe that owning a car is superfluous. This case has resulted in the failure of various automobile industries in South Africa, which has had a significant impact on market trends and economic development.

Finally, the adoption of car ownership rules inside cities is critical; nevertheless, both advantages and downsides must be considered. The government, along with public sector institutions and commercial sectors in the transportation industry, must actively work to build arrangements that allow for mutually beneficial policy development. In this scenario, three crucial components are involved: the government, the people, and, last, but equally important, businessmen.

Band 7 IELTS Essay

In our contemporary era, developed towns grapple with the colossal problem of traffic jams: an unfortunate byproduct of excessive automobile presence. Thus, certain cities have resorted to a notable solution - implementing fees for cars entering city centers; this strategy is employed as a means to regulate congestion and manage urban transportation infrastructure effectively.

Without a doubt, this policy will engender positive effects on traffic: it is evident that increased costs for city-center driving prompts drivers to cogitate thoroughly whether their commutes are necessary. Moreover, the ripple effect of our incentive-based approach encourages behaviors such as carpooling; simultaneously— and significantly —it boosts usage of public transportation. Consequently, a significant transformation in traffic flow would ensue: less delay would lead to more efficient movement.

I assert, however, that the negatives of this approach decidedly surpass the positives. Primarily: implementing necessary tools would prove insurmountable for the government due to exorbitant costs; furthermore—this strategy could escalate difficulties for individuals in settling their bills. Indeed, certain individuals constantly navigate the city due to their professional demands; despite its potential non-effect on high-earning drivers, this strategy would undeniably impact workers earning an average income.

Conclusively, we deem the aforementioned approach excessively perfect for utilization. Conversely, during rush hours--when accessibility is vital--it falls on the government's shoulders to enforce cost-effective or complimentary public transportation into the city center; this would inevitably encourage higher usage among commuters.

Check IELTS Writing Task 2 Samples