Park Land Should be Used for Housing IELTS Writing Task 2

Park Land Should be Used for Housing IELTS Writing Task 2 has three sample answers provided below. It requires candidates to answer a simple question with argumentative statements. The sample answers have an introduction and body. The introduction provides a brief description of the given topic. The body in each sample answer portrays argumentative statements to support the test-taker’s perspectives.
IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching- Join Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings. Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development, because this land would be better used for housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Model Answer 1

For individuals and families looking for opportunities, many large cities are tempting destinations. This has led to a housing crisis together with the growing population. Parks might be converted into apartments and homes, according to both the government and housing businesses, who believe this is a better use of the land. In my opinion, there are many other, better options available, and this misuse of the natural landscape's greenery is just unacceptable.

In large cities, parks and gardens are extremely valuable. First off, despite the fact that cities are already congested, residents should occasionally relax and appreciate the nearby outdoors. Especially given how stressful city life can be. In addition, parks are ideal places for families to interact, children to play, and local celebrations and events to take place. Additionally, green spaces are beneficial because they not only continuously offer us clean air to breathe. But also because the wide-open areas have been shown to have positive effects on our eyes and our mental health. As a result, these institutions are greatly needed and shouldn't be eliminated.

Of course, there are a lot of other pertinent considerations. Building companies and governmental plans should prioritise the urban periphery. Many of these locations have large, undeveloped grounds. As a result, more individuals will be motivated to move to rural areas where they are more likely to be required and given employment opportunities. Another excellent idea is to use more advanced engineering to construct skyscrapers, which can house more people on a given plot of land without squeezing them. It is important to make use of such advancements in technology. So, before putting the sustainability of green space in a crowded city at risk, states have a few options.

In conclusion, despite the fact that providing livable housing for urban populations is a challenging issue, governments shouldn't ban parks. I think parks provide numerous benefits, and we should protect them. There are also, in my opinion, other admirable solutions to this problem.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Articles

Check: IELTS Actual Test ebooks Combo

Model Answer 2

Many large cities are reportedly experiencing a housing crisis as a result of a lack of available land for the construction of new homes. To make room for the development of new structures, some governments are proposing a strategy in which parks will be taken out of the cities. This essay will outline my objections to this solution.

First off, parklands are an essential part of the infrastructure of large cities. Parklands supply the oxygen we need to breathe, but residential development generates vast amounts of trash during building. In addition, parklands are necessary to give large cities a good, fresh appearance. In New York City, The Central Park serves as the city's lungs; without it, the city would appear barren and green. Additionally, some people choose to live in urban settings with only trees, fountains, an abundance of grass, and animals.

Additionally, park areas have a positive impact on people's health and well-being. Parks are used by some people for physical activity, including running and yoga. Recent studies carried out in Finland have demonstrated that people who live close to public parks are healthier. Rather than those who live in large cities surrounded by buildings. In order to escape the bustle and stress of large cities, many individuals visit parks and other green spaces. Furthermore, if large cities lack green spaces and parks, the air quality could deteriorate and inhabitants' health could suffer.

To sum up, housing projects might be important in some large cities. But I believe there might be other ways to construct new housing projects than removing parkland from the cities. The government should ensure that parklands will be conserved and that they will play a critical role in ensuring people's future well-being.

Model Answer 3

Numerous issues, like the housing crisis, have been brought on by a recent economic expansion in many nations. Due to this situation, many local governments began to believe that similar issues might be solved by relocating public parks into residential areas. I vehemently disagree, though, with the viewpoint presented above. Instead, I'm confident that green spaces have a number of advantages for our society and the environment. There are two explanations for this.

First and foremost, parks provide our society with valuable leisure space. We are under more pressure than ever to maintain a healthy lifestyle due to the problem of rising obesity rates. We require wide green spaces to live such a lifestyle, for example, to go for family picnics or to exercise. Breathing clean air and lowering daily stress brought on by an urban lifestyle, leads to an improvement in the quality of life. As a result, parks serve a valuable role in our neighbourhood. And give even the poorest members of our society access to an affordable way to relax.

Second, and maybe even more crucially, colourful and vivid plants in public parks help lessen pollution brought on by the urban population. Most people agree that these trees help fight air pollution. For example, by absorbing the quantity of carbon dioxide and other dangerous gases released in the air and giving us oxygen. Furthermore, it's commonly believed that trees in parks absorb dirty pollution from the streets, preventing pollution.

I will admit that I am aware of how difficult the housing crisis is. However, city planners ought to take into account the potential advantages that parks could provide for our communities as a whole. In addition, if space is actually at a premium, government officials would better look into alternative options like shopping centres or parking lots.

To summarise, from my perspective, I vehemently oppose the use of park spaces to stop urban growth. Specifically, because of the numerous benefits that parks provide for people and the ecosystem in general.