Old Buildings IELTS Writing Task 2

Aug 30, 2022

Old Buildings IELTS Writing Task 2 has three sample answers provided. This is an advantage-disadvantage essay. This particular IELTS writing task 2 sample answer focuses on the reasons for more people travelling and the benefits of travelling for the traveller. Lastly, the conclusion implies the examples to support the reasons and the knowledge.

IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Too much money is wasted on repairing old buildings that should be used to knock them down and build new ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Band 8 IELTS Essay

Old buildings are the symbols of the nation’s cultural identity. There are various types of identities that are binding on different and varied sets of populations. One such identity, mainly in diverse nations like India, is cultural identity. Old architecture and the illustrations of a building not only signifies the capitalism and economic activity being held behind a monument but also depicts the nature and temperament of a particular time period in which the building has been constructed.

Generally, in the smaller cities, the preservation and conservation tactics are ignored. In fact, the notion of saving the building has no scope so far in such less – focused areas like the North - Eastern Region of India. The maintenance amount of such old buildings could be expectedly high. And the contemporary capitalist approach to view the society would not allow many individuals to invest in their restoration. The pay for the novel creation could be considered more sustainable than the restoration one. Although, restoration is not that comfortable and not at all a piece of cake. Re – building any monument would not only require the capital but also a great investment in research and development as well. The very idea behind the original construction of the buildings would have been much different than the present interpretations of modern humans.

Another and the most important aspect of viewing the old buildings shall be the purpose for which we have United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Albeit, not every old building serves the essential purpose to be preserved but most of them do. Multiple large scale international and national projects and initiatives work for the conservation of such old buildings leaving no bit of dilemma to doubt in the investment of the restoration of the buildings constructed in the history. Present is the moulded past and thus heritage is a part of history. So, to save history one must look into the strategies and basic aim to conserve the buildings that symbolizes the intricate characteristics and details of the various elements, biotic or abiotic, attached to it.

Concluding it, I would like to emphasize the phrase that “every coin has two facets”. And so do this idea of old buildings. Calling upon them as ‘useless' or restoring them with a handful of efforts to recreate the history and preserve the heritage for all the coming generations to be fortunate and proud of their lineages, is all based on different perceptions.

Band 6 IELTS Essay

Today, a lot of individuals argue that funds that could be better spent on contemporary infrastructure are instead being diverted to the maintenance of ageing structures. Old buildings are crucial cultural remnants in my opinion, despite the fact that modern ones are more practical.

A building's genuine function should take precedence, argue progressive modernity proponents logically. Cities that have experienced significant growth during the past 50 years, like Kolkata, India, are an excellent illustration of this. Sentimentality about both colonial-era and post-colonial architecture has been replaced by the country's rapid economic prosperity. Construction of hospitals, hotels, restaurants, and offices sometimes involves the bulldozing of outdated structures that don't adhere to current safety regulations. All of these new structures, unlike the ones designated for demolition, serve important purposes in a metropolis of the twenty-first century and are not just there for aesthetic purposes.

Despite the aforementioned justifications, older structures help preserve a city's unique cultural identity. Smaller cities, such as Chiang Mai in Thailand, have been able to preserve the majority of their historic structures while larger cities, such as Kolkata and Beijing, have ruthlessly swept aside the past in favour of an inevitable future. As a result, there are more than just historical buildings like old city walls and pagodas that are popular with tourists. The people of Chiang Mai and other Thai citizens can go there and be reminded of the grace and tenacity of their ancestors. Beijing's contempt for the past inspires the country as a whole to mimic the tenacious pursuit of development that is distinctive of the twenty-first century.

In conclusion, it is crucial to maintain historic structures since they contribute to a country's cultural character. A more cohesive national populace will benefit the governments that embrace this long-term, multidimensional perspective.

Band 6.5 IELTS Essay

People from different backgrounds frequently disagree over whether historical buildings should be preserved or torn down. They are significant markers in the eyes of some of them, but useless to others. Before a definitive judgement can be formed, both points of view will be examined in this essay and critically assessed. On the one hand, those who think it's important to preserve established structures acknowledge their involvement in a country's arrest epidemic. This is owing to the fact that a certain nation derives its distinctive identity solely from the cultural traditions it has inherited across the world. In order to experience distinct traditional values and historic ways of life, for instance, travellers go to various locations all over the world.

As a result, if a nation's historical treasures are lost, their special importance will become absolute.
Only a small number of people passionately dispute the preservation of traditional structures, nevertheless. Given the scarcity of resources and the quick rate of population expansion, it is likely that they are worried about the enormous growth of demands in the modern world. To provide an example, if a city is crowded and there are many abandoned buildings taking up a lot of space, it would be a sensible choice to demolish them and provide the city's residents with a new residential area. As a result, the government must not be unwilling to use a space that is superfluous when it can be made more productive for the welfare of the residents.

After carefully weighing all sides of the debate, I have come to the conclusion that while old buildings unquestionably have priceless historical significance, it may not be prudent to preserve them if doing so would interfere with society's ability to operate.

Check- IELTS Writing Samples