Nowadays, it is Possible to Move Sea Creatures from their Natural Habitat at Sea IELTS Writing Task 2

On the one extreme, not everyone is capable of venturing out into the ocean to observe the aquatic environment. One can fulfill their wish to see a vast variety of water species in an aquarium. The ability of some aqua parks to breed species that are in danger of going extinct is another factor. A rare species thought to have gone extinct hundreds of years ago. The coelacanth was successfully fed by the Blue Coral Aquarium of Malaysia after being caught off the coast of Kuala Lumpur. At the same time, illnesses of unknown origin claimed the lives of 50% of all aquatic creatures in the same aquarium.

This condition needs to be changed because it is unfair to the creatures. Even though the employees and veterinarians take good care of the animals. They are nonetheless confined to tiny tanks. Big creatures like whales are beginning to act more aggressively or despondent as a result. Another issue with retaining those animals is that these parks' primary objective is to generate revenue from marine wildlife. And the animals are not granted the right to miss any performances. Additionally, the only time the animals eat is during the performance.

On the other extreme, marine wildlife prefers to roam free and finds discomfort in any enclosed area. Additionally, because the caregivers will be feeding them frequently, they will lose their innate desire to hunt. In conclusion, while raising rare species and providing entertainment are benefits of keeping marine animals in captivity. There are also drawbacks that point to the fact that these animals are healthier in the ocean, where they belong.

Critics of this viewpoint contend that it is preferable for people to enjoy themselves by maintaining marine mammals in amusement parks. First of all, members of the public of all ages can learn about unusual creatures and their behaviors and traits. Second, kids are probably going to feel a connection to nature itself. Children, for instance, may be the most helpful age group since they can quickly recall and recognize these animals by seeing them in settings. Rather than by viewing them in books. Consequently, some support the inclusion of aquatic life in parks.

Others, on the other hand, disagree with this assertion. Because not all amusement areas are sufficiently developed to be regarded as an advantageous habitat for marine wildlife. They might also be maintained in captivity. As a result, it can impair their development and wellbeing. Moving marine life will likely lead to an imbalance in the cycle of life in the ecosystem. For instance, a new study reveals that the quantity of salmon fish has drastically reduced in the Pacific Ocean. Affecting the food chain of other marine organisms. As a result, some believe that this movement may have more drawbacks than advantages.

In conclusion, although ocean wildlife in theme parks can be enjoyed by visitors. It may disrupt the cycle of life in the environment and worsen the health of animals kept in cages. According to me, it is the responsibility of the government to set rigorous regulations on park officials. So that they maintain animals in an appropriate environment, supply them with wholesome food. And restrict the amount of time that they are transported from the sea to parks.

On the one hand, bringing sea creatures out of their natural habitat and into amusement parks offers some advantages. For instance, by conducting significant research on a particular marine animal, scientists can help save the species from extinction. Any organism that is being removed from the ocean must first undergo a thorough investigation of its natural habitat. In other instances, oceanographers have also forecast the extinction of specific marine animals. And have taken action to create conditions that will allow the organisms to flourish in the future. Obviously, human activity and ocean warming are causing many ocean creatures to go extinct, thus it is necessary to relocate them to safer waters.

Every animal, without exception, ought to have the freedom to roam. Because, in my opinion, it is unfair to confine a living creature to a small space of water. Or an aquarium that is incomparable to the natural world. And forces it to depend on a human who suppresses all of its natural instincts because doing so could be dangerous to him. This animal used to swim through the seas, eat natural foods, and hunt for food.

On the other extreme, their inability to adapt to life in man-made habitats is their greatest drawback. They risk dying because of this. There is no danger in attempting to preserve them in artificial water bodies if they are endangered in their native habitat. However, transporting healthy and secure animals out of their natural habitat and into aquariums for human enjoyment is undoubtedly immoral.

Marine life will be healthier in their own wild areas rather than in man-made ponds. I would suggest a conclusion. The mortality rate is low in the amusement parks. Despite the fact that the artificial ecosystem is effectively mimicked for the species to live.