Much Ado About Nothing Reading Answers

Oct 21, 2023

Much Ado About Nothing Reading Answers contains 13 questions that are to be answered in 20 minutes. IELTS topic- Much Ado About Nothing Reading Answers deals with information about the controversy surrounding genetically engineered food that can teach people involved in nanotechnology. Much Ado About Nothing Reading Answers contains two IELTS reading question types. They are writing the correct answer and identifying whether the statements can be inferred. Candidates need to skim through the passage for the best answer. They can also refer to IELTS Reading practice papers.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1

Read the Passage to Answer the Following Questions

Much Ado About Nothing Reading Answers

The controversy surrounding genetically engineered food can teach people involved in nanotechnology several important lessons.

“The time has passed for discussing the benefits and drawbacks of GM crops. The commercialization of GM crops will become an undesirable alternative due to severe and persistent economic intimidation.”
These are the kind of statements made in an article in the most recent issue of Earth First!, a radical environmental publication, that give people working to commercialise biotechnology the sweats. For the most part, those concerned, the level of public opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs) came as a shock and surprise. Some are now speculating as to whether nanotechnology, which refers to the manipulation of matter at sizes of a millionth of a millimetre, would experience a similar reaction and, if so, whether its proponents might draw any lessons from the public's opposition to biotechnology.

Gain of Doom
Jeffrey Matsuura, a law professor at the University of Dayton in Ohio, was present at a Nanotech conference held in Boston last week, but he was hidden away in a forgotten corner with his unassuming poster of his work. But everyone in attendance needed to consider his warning, especially the investors who were searching the conference for investment opportunities. And the reason for this is that nanotechnology is already influenced by a number of the reasons that led to a popular backlash against biotechnology. According to Dr. Matsuura, biotechnologists believed that the general population would recognise and value biotechnology's promise to enhance quality of life right away. Instead, the risks caught the media's and a large portion of the public's attention. Well-fed The idea of cheaper food, in particular, was regarded with skepticism by European customers. Many believed that the hazards associated with cultivating and ingesting the crops would be borne by the general public, while the benefits would go to the businesses that had produced GMOs.
According to Dr. Matsuura, the public's opinion of nanotechnology is evolving in a similar manner. The initial uses of nanotechnology, like those of biotechnology, won't have many overt advantages for consumers. Reduced applications of agricultural chemicals, which assist to keep the cost down while improving yields, are reminiscent of the "advantages" of biotech, as are better, cheaper materials and hidden production efficiencies that benefit producers initially. Consumer gains that are immediately apparent, like advancements in medicine, are further off.
This is unnecessary because consumers ultimately gain from cost savings as well. However, in combination with the perception that there are risks, a lack of instant advantages could quickly sway public opinion against nanotech. And there are possible risks. It is absurd to worry about uncontrollable, self-replicating "nanobots" that would ultimately consume and turn the entire planet into "grey goo." It is still possible for new "nanoparticles" to pose serious toxicological risks.
Nanoparticles are so tiny that they might stick to the lungs if ingested. They are theoretically tiny enough to get inside living cells and build up there. In addition, at a Royal Institution presentation in London in January, Ken Donaldson, a professor of respiratory toxicology at the University of Edinburgh, demonstrated that ultrafine carbon particles can enter the bloodstream and travel to the brain after inhalation.
Nanoparticle-based goods, including sunscreen and auto components, are already widely available. Despite the fact that all of this might sound concerning, people have always been subjected to various types of nanoparticles throughout history. For instance, carbon particulates comprise soot. Yet, nanoparticles from sources including diesel soot, photocopier toner, and welding gases are already connected to ill-health. Many people are probably concerned about the possibility of more such particles. It makes sense that several speakers at the Boston conference referred to the need to "aggressively" handle public concerns about nanotechnology.
One of them was Clayton Teague, the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office's director in America. He claims that just like any other member of the public, the American government is sensitive to any indication of a real health danger. The risks of nanotechnology to the ecosystem and to human health are currently the subject of numerous sizable and well-funded studies.
Dr. Teague adds that any choices made regarding nanotechnology will be carefully considered and supported by reliable scientific evidence. But even if science approves, one of Dr. Matsuura's lesson is that this might not always prevail and that concern over possible abuses and accidents may end up dictating the conversation.
Dr. Matsuura suggests, among other things, that everyone participating should convey the same message. A person who is worried about the hazards cannot be informed that a technology is unimportant after being told that it would transform the world by investors. Saying that anything may be both innovative and unimportant strikes the wrong tone, in his opinion. Such contradictions will increase public worry and suspicion.

Product Placement
Donald Reed is a senior consultant with Ecos in Sydney, Australia-based company that serves as a middleman between businesses and activists. Mr. Reed even advises businesses to consider the early commodities they decide to develop, namely whether they can show the "societal value" of these products. One early application of nanotechnology, for instance, might be the development of inexpensive, effective photovoltaic materials, which are used to produce power from sunlight.

Section 2

Solution and Explanation

Questions 1-4

Take a look at the following people with the list of statements below. Choose the appropriate statement for each individual.

Clayton Teague
Ken Donaldson
Donald Reed
Jeffrey Matsuura

List of statements:

Factors that led to resistance to biotechnology are having an impact on nanotechnology.
The majority of the benefits of nanotechnology growth will go to Europeans.
Any decisions regarding nanotechnology will be made on the basis of reliable scientific evidence.
Governments are powerless to influence the advancement of nanotechnology.
There's no need to be alarmed about nanotechnology.
When inhaled, carbon nanoparticles can travel to the blood flow and brain.
Companies should demonstrate the social benefits of their early nanotechnology items.

Question: 1

Answer: C
Supporting Sentence: Dr. Teague adds that any choices made regarding nanotechnology will be carefully considered and supported by reliable scientific evidence
Keywords: nanotechnology, scientific evidence
Keyword Location: Paragraph 9, Line 1.
Explanation: "Dr. Teague adds that any decisions regarding nanotechnology will be … by reliable scientific evidence," says the first sentence. As a result, Clayton Teague remarked, "Any decisions regarding… on the basis of reliable scientific evidence."

Question: 2

Answer: F
Supporting Sentence: At a Royal Institution presentation in London in January, Ken Donaldson, a professor of respiratory toxicology at the University of Edinburgh, demonstrated that ultrafine carbon particles can enter the bloodstream and travel to the brain after inhalation.
Keywords: ultrafine carbon particles
Keyword Location: Paragraph 6, Line 2.
Explanation: The next sentence in the paragraph reads: "At a Royal Institution presentation in London in January, Ken Donaldson,... carbon particles can enter the bloodstream and travel to the brain after inhalation." As a result, Ken Donaldson noted, "When inhaled, carbon nanoparticles can travel to the blood flow and brain."

Question: 3

Answer: G
Supporting Sentence: Mr. Reed even advises businesses to consider the early commodities they decide to develop, namely whether they can show the "societal value" of these products.
Keywords: societal value
Keyword Location: Paragraph 11, Line 2.
Explanation: According to the statement, "Mr. Reed even advises businesses to consider the … show the "societal value" of these products." Thus, Donald Reed observed, "Companies should demonstrate the social benefits of their early nanotechnology items."

Question: 4

Answer: A
Supporting Sentence: Nanotechnology is already influenced by a number of the reasons that led to a popular backlash against biotechnology.
Keywords: popular backlash
Keyword Location: Paragraph 3, Line 5.
Explanation: In the fifth sentence of the paragraph, it says, "And the reason for this is that …of the reasons that led to a popular backlash against biotechnology." As a result, Jeffrey Matsuura observed, "Factors that led to resistance to biotechnology are having an impact on nanotechnology."

Questions 5-8

Complete the sentences given below.
For each answer, choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the paragraph.
Fill in boxes 5 - 8 on your answer sheet with your responses.

Those who were employed there were shocked to learn that the general public strongly disapproved of __________.
Europeans responded to the suggestion of cheaper food with __________.
Nanobots, which could one day alter the Earth is _____________, are causing people anxiety.
Photocopier toner nanoparticles have already been tied to _________.

Question: 5

Answer: genetically modified organism/ GMOs
Supporting Sentence: For the most part, those concerned, the level of public opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs) came as a shock and surprise.
Keywords: genetically modified organisms
Keyword Location: Paragraph 2, Line 3.
Explanation: This line states unequivocally, "For the most part, those concerned, the level of public opposition to … surprise." Those who worked there were astonished to hear that the general populace was highly opposed to GMOs.

Question: 6

Answer: skepticism
Supporting Sentence: Well-fed The idea of cheaper food, in particular, was regarded with skepticism by European customers
Keywords: European customers
Keyword Location: Paragraph 3, Line 10.
Explanation: The phrase "well-fed" "The idea of cheaper food, in particular, was met with scepticism by European customers" indicates that Europeans were sceptical of the suggestion of cheaper food.

Question: 7

Answer: absurd
Supporting Sentence: It is absurd to worry about uncontrollable, self-replicating "nanobots" that would ultimately consume and turn the entire planet into grey goo
Keywords: self-replicating, grey goo
Keyword Location: Paragraph 5, line 4.
Explanation: The line "It is absurd to worry about uncontrollable, self-replicating "nanobots" …turn the entire planet into grey goo" suggests that nanobots, which could one day alter the Earth, are absurd and are causing people distress.

Question: 8

Answer: ill- Health
Supporting Sentence: For instance, carbon particulates comprise soot. Yet, nanoparticles from sources including diesel soot, photocopier toner, and welding gases are already connected to ill-health
Keywords: diesel soot, photocopier toner
Keyword Location: Paragraph 7, Line 4.
Explanation: The phrase "for example, carbon particulates comprise soot." However, nanoparticles … and welding fumes have already been linked to illness." Photocopier toner nanoparticles have already been linked to illness.

Questions 9-13

Using the letters from A-L listed below, complete the summary.

Some individuals think that nanotechnology might have the same 9. ____________fate as biotechnology. Rather than celebrating the 10. _____________, the media and a lot of the general public concentrate on the 11. _______________of biotechnology. Therefore, it is crucial to underline the immediate 12. __________ of nanotechnology; otherwise, the public may develop a 13. _______________ towards nanotech. Hence, it's critical that everyone involved maintain consistency.

A. Worse	B. Greater	C. Devices	D. Particles
E. Costs	F. Latter	G. Dangers	H. Thoughts
I. Advantage	J. Former	K. Attitude	L. Comparable

Question: 9

Answer: L
Supporting Sentence: According to Dr. Matsuura, the public's opinion of nanotechnology is evolving in a similar manner.
Keywords: opinion of nanotechnology
Keyword Location: Paragraph 4, Line 1.
Explanation: This paragraph states, "According to Dr. Matsuura, the … in a similar manner." The earliest applications of nanotechnology, … benefits for consumers." It suggests that some people believe nanotechnology will follow in the footsteps of biotechnology.

Question: 10

Answer: F
Supporting Sentence: According to Dr. Matsuura, biotechnologists believed that the general population would recognise and value biotechnology's …
Keywords: value biotechnology
Keyword Location: Paragraph 3, Line 7.
Explanation: According to Dr. Matsuura, biotechnologists felt that the general populace … to improve quality of life straight away." Instead, the hazards drew the attention of the media and a substantial percentage of the population." This implies that, rather than praising the latter, the media and a large portion of the public focus on the risks of biotechnology.

Question: 11

Answer: G
Supporting Sentence: According to Dr. Matsuura, biotechnologists believed that the general population would recognise and value biotechnology's promise to enhance quality of life right away.
Keywords: hazards drew the attention
Keyword Location: Paragraph 3, Line 9.
Explanation: This paragraph also reveals that "according to Dr. Matsuura, biotechnologists … to improve quality of life." Instead, the hazards drew the attention of the media and a substantial percentage of the population." This implies that, rather than praising the latter, the media and a large portion of the public focus on the risks of biotechnology.

Question: 12

Answer: I
Supporting Sentence: However, in combination with the perception that there are risks, a lack of instant advantages could quickly sway public opinion against nanotech
Keywords: risks, a lack of instant advantages
Keyword Location: Paragraph 5, Line 2.
Explanation: The line plainly states, "However, in combination with the perception that there are risks, a lack of immediate benefits could quickly sway public opinion against nanotech." As a result, it emphasises the importance of emphasising the immediate benefits of nanotechnology; otherwise, the public may develop a negative attitude towards nanotechnology. As a result, everyone concerned must maintain consistency.

Question: 13

Answer: K
Supporting Sentence: However, in combination with the perception that there are risks, a lack of instant advantages could quickly sway public opinion against nanotech
Keywords: public opinion against nanotech
Keyword Location: Paragraph 5, Line 3.
Explanation: Furthermore, the line states, "However, combined with the perception that there are risks, a lack of immediate benefits could quickly sway public opinion against nanotech." As a result, it emphasises the importance of emphasising the immediate benefits of nanotechnology; otherwise, the public may develop a negative attitude towards nanotechnology. As a result, everyone concerned must maintain consistency.