Movement Away From Written Exams to More Practical Assessment IELTS Writing Task 2

Jan 24, 2023

Movement Away From Written Exams to More Practical Assessment IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answers have been provided below. Movement Away From Written Exams to More Practical Assessment IELTS Writing Task 2 dwells on recent shift from traditional examinations to practical examinations. The candidates are required to discuss the importance of both the modes of examinations. Candidates have to discuss both the viewpoints negative and positive regarding the different modes of examination. A brief conclusion mentioning the main points must be added. The body of the answers holds the supported statements of the candidates. In the conclusion of Movement Away From Written Exams to More Practical Assessment IELTS Writing Task 2 the summary of the main points must be added. Three samples of this IELTS Writing Task 2 are provided for the students so that they can select from a range of answers.

Movement Away From Written Exams to More Practical Assessment IELTS Writing Task 2 evaluates candidates based on views and knowledge they have expressed in their answers. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Title: In the modern world there is a movement away from written exams to more practical assessments. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend.

Band 6 IELTS Essay

A practical assessment has replaced written tests as the preferred technique of evaluation in recent years. Both advantages and disadvantages might be associated with this inclination. There are many benefits that a practical test could provide, on the one hand. First off, it reflects the level of effort put forth by students to finish their projects, this kind of test will be able to gauge students' true abilities. On the other hand, it is quite easy for pupils to cheat on examinations that use paper and pencil. They are able to receive a flying colour grade as a result without studying. Second, a system of assessment that includes group projects, presentations, and interviews allows students to dramatically improve their soft skills. For instance, giving a presentation might boost someone's confidence when speaking in front of an audience. On the other hand, this inclination could have some negative effects. An enough household budget is needed to purchase a number of necessary pieces of equipment for the practical exam. For example, it completely requires a huge expenditure for a nation to buy a large number of computers. It implies that conducting this kind of test in developing nations is almost impossible. This trend's requirement for highly qualified teachers is another drawback. Unlike regular tests, which have a clear criteria to make it easier for the examiner to mark the pupils, this exam does not. Giving applicants a precise band score for their performance may be more challenging for the teacher. In conclusion, taking a practical exam can be advantageous. This is because it accurately assesses a student's aptitude and gives them more chances to improve their fundamental abilities. But it can also be detrimental because it calls for highly qualified instructors and a lot of funding.

Band 6.5 IELTS Essay

The right way to evaluate students using practical assessments rather than conventional written ones is one of the pressing challenges in today's society. In this essay, I'll cover both the positive and bad effects of this trend. While also addressing some of the controversies surrounding which method is more effective and precise. First of all, it is generally acknowledged that technology has significantly altered how we educate and assess pupils. Therefore, we need fresh teaching strategies in order to keep up with new and better advancements and methodologies. So that the outdated methods of evaluation can no longer gauge how well students have understood their courses, new methods of evaluation are required. Written tests take a lot of time, and there is solid evidence that they do not accurately reflect students' knowledge. As some students memorise information very quickly, but then forget it much more quickly later. Having said that, it should not be forgotten, even when the practical approach to grading is used. It can be challenging to assign grades to pupils based solely on their performance. Additionally, it depends on how examiners interpret the results, and finding experienced professors for our educational institutions is a challenge. Additionally, more time and money must be spent on practical exams with set grading standards. It follows that this is the apparent explanation for why traditional approaches have maintained their appeal to this day. Additionally, there aren't enough standards for practical evaluation in various subjects, including history and others. Because of this, classic estimation methods can be used appropriately, and a combined exam system should be in place in such areas. In general, practical examinations have gained popularity recently as one of the primary methods of grading pupils despite significant limitations. However written exams are also widely used all over the world. Both forms of exams, in my opinion, are necessary for evaluating students' talents and aptitudes.

Band 7 IELTS Essay

The only available evaluation method in the past was the written exam. But today there are many additional ways to evaluate a student's academic achievement thanks to technology improvements. It is pretty evident that schools and other educational and training institutions are choosing to combine multiple evaluation methodologies. And this change has both benefits and drawbacks, which I will discuss in this essay. The benefits of practical techniques to evaluating pupils are that they take into account a student's accuracy and depth of information. This in addition to their overall learning and understanding. For example, a student can quickly memorise the answers and do well on a written exam if the exam is conducted on paper. The capacity to memorise and respond, however, might be somewhat helpful to him if he were required to demonstrate his knowledge in a lab. Students who have truly internalised the material would perform exceedingly well in practical assessments. Additionally, these evaluation techniques help students get ready for the demands of the working world. Such as interviews, group projects, presentations, and lab experiments. Those that put a little more effort into their studies can often pass the exam by manipulating the evaluation process. It brings us to the drawbacks of practical assessment. As an illustration, a recent survey of students from five different universities gave an idea what people preferred. Survey found that they preferred lab experiments, online presentations, and group projects to written exams because the latter required more preparation. In addition, teachers occasionally favour certain students and mark some students poorly. Due to personal reasons, the authority has limited control over re-evaluating this marking method in the future. As a result, a combination of evaluation procedures should be used to implement a real assessment of a student, which is a duty that schools must do. Students are better prepared for future problems in both the academic and professional worlds due to the various advantages that come with practical evaluation.

Check- IELTS Writing Samples