Money Spent by Governments on Space Programmes Would be Better Spent on Vital Public Services IELTS Writing Task 2

Bhaskar Das

Feb 17, 2023

Money Spent by Governments on Space Programmes Would be Better Spent on Vital Public Services IELTS Writing Task 2 sample answers have been provided below. This IELTS Writing topic brings to light the money spent by government on space programmes. The candidates have to show their agreement or disagreement with this view. A brief conclusion mentioning the main points in Money Spent by Governments on Space Programmes Would be Better Spent on Vital Public Services IELTS Writing Task 2 must be added. Three samples of this IELTS Writing Task 2 are provided for the students so that they can select from a range of answers. The body of the answers holds the supported statements of the candidates. In the conclusion, the agreement and disagreement are mentioned as per the provided tentative arguments.

IELTS Writing Task 2 evaluates candidates based on views and knowledge they have expressed in their answers. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics. These Practice papers have similar samples like Money Spent by Governments on Space Programmes Would be Better Spent on Vital Public Services IELTS Writing Task 2.

CheckGet 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
CheckRegister for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Band 8 IELTS Essay

It is sometimes argued that governments in some nations are wasting a lot of money on space programs to explore the universe rather than using those funds to provide public services. This view completely piques my interest. In this essay, I will provide my view and support it with reasons and justification.

To begin, there are a number of good reasons not to fund public services. First, we don't have a lot of money to spend. So if we spend money on public services, we'll just make better use of what we already have instead of finding new sources. Second, Earth's population is growing over time, and if we don't find a new world where we can get the food we need, there will be a famine. It takes time to train employees who provide services like teaching, medical care, police work, and so on. In addition, public servants use a wide range of resources while carrying out work that benefits society.

In contrast, I believe that space missions should continue to receive funding from governments rather than essential public services. As a result, we need to find other planets and search for essential resources without which we cannot exist. For example, oxygen for breathing, water for drinking, petroleum for energy, and food for eating. Additionally, if we discover a suitable environment for survival, we can relocate a portion of our population there and become a multi-planet species. We also know that there are a lot of galaxies and planets in them, so at least one of the planets must have another intelligent species like humans on it. Last but not least, there are a lot of planets in space, and one of them could be another source of energy.

In conclusion, I believe that space projects that will benefit all of us should continue to be funded by the country's authorities.

Band 7 IELTS Essay

I believe that governments must spend more on space research than on public services like schools and hospitals. It should be a top international priority, in my opinion. In addition to reducing global warming, this change may also lower energy resource prices. I will explain the details in this essay.

First, burning gasoline and its derivatives damages the atmosphere's ozone layer by emitting a significant amount of greenhouse gasses. Since more than 90% of the planet's energy sources are nonrenewable, global warming is accelerating. To put it another way, pollution will get worse if governments (provide) don't act quickly. Scientific reports indicate that the average global temperature is almost ten times higher now than it was in the 1980s. This is harmful not only to humans but also to the atmosphere as a whole. Pollution caused by burning fuel is directly linked to this alarming climate change.

Second, because of the extensive extraction of petroleum deposits, the prices of nonrenewable fuels have been rising. As a result, petroleum must be replaced with more cost-effective energy sources. As a result, these deposits will eventually tend to disappear, increasing the price of gasoline significantly. The European Union is accelerating advancements in solar and wind energy generation as a means of resolving this issue. For instance, the majority of Norway's energy comes from renewable sources like hydro, biomass, wind, and solar. In addition, the fact that the electricity service in Norway is by far the most affordable in the world demonstrates the economic benefits of utilizing unrestricted natural resources. The world needs a new source of energy for which the space explorations are required.

In conclusion, developing public resources like schools and hospitals will improve the lifestyle but will not help in the long run. Spending money on space explorations might provide us with something that will help the world to prevail.

Band 6 IELTS Essay

Space Programs research and development receive a significant portion of public funding each year. Some argue that the same amount of money could be better used in other public sectors like healthcare and education. In this essay, I will provide my opinion and justification behind the selection.

To a large extent, I agree with this argument. Even though I think space research is important, it doesn't always affect how people live their daily lives. In addition, the Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated that the present healthcare and educational systems are insufficiently prepared to deal with a pandemic of this magnitude. For instance, schools did not know exactly how they would conduct classes remotely, and hospitals did not have enough beds to accommodate the number of Covid patients. First and foremost, high-quality education is essential for future generations' talent development. A much greater return will be achieved by investing in high-quality faculty, curriculum development, and infrastructure. Furthermore, investing in healthcare research can keep us ahead of the curve and guarantee excellent services for residents and citizens.

Space research also improves our future in the long run but it won't affect our day to day lives. I agree that space research and exploration is required. However, that should be done only after the daily requirements of people are met.

To summarize, while space programs are important in their own right, I do not believe they are more important than the need for high-quality health and education facilities.

Check- IELTS Writing Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show