Money for Postgraduate Research is Limited IELTS Writing Task 2

Therefore, in my opinion, this is the area that needs the most financing. The nations with the highest chances of success are those that are at the forefront of scientific advancement. The two lists will resemble each other if we rank nations first by their level of scientific advancement and then by their level of economic prosperity. Most likely, scientific advancements will lead to employment opportunities, even ones for persons without science backgrounds. It is widely known that science and technology can aid in a nation's development. The use of computer technology, which has substantially increased the effectiveness of our job and altered our way of life, serves as one notable example. The development of scientific theories and their implementations is credited for technological advancements. Science education should receive financial backing from the government. Such as creating new laboratories, investing in cutting-edge gear, and recognizing great scientists. More students would choose to focus on science if the government gave scientific disciplines more importance. Both the nation and the entire world would gain from it. However, I do not believe that all government funding should be allocated to graduate-level scientific research. Even if science is significant, it is not everything. The general public and the government should also pay attention to and promote other topics, like art. Students are encouraged to consider the meaning of life and form a positive outlook on the world through philosophy and literature. Students' horizons are widened through history and geography, which also helps to develop their wisdom and open-mindedness. As a result, we shouldn't disregard how other subjects are treated in our educational system. In conclusion, non-scientific research should be taken into account and funded by the government as well.

In this case, science components because government spending is a type of investment that must demonstrate some level of output. Whether physical or intangible and is not just a one-sided charity or donation. Furthermore, there is not even a single civilization that does not have advanced technologies. Therefore, pursuing unique and superior technical expertise would be crucial to the development of the nation. For instance, the development of advanced technology in Europe, benefited greatly from financial backing beginning in the 17th century. It led to the creation of the richest nations in the world today. However, I firmly feel that it is wrong for graduate institutions to offer subsidiaries in every discipline. First of all, graduate and doctoral students are eager to pay their tuition. Actually, they don't require financial assistance. Second, there is no justification for encouraging people to pursue their own interests as a study goal. Compared to engineering majors, literary experts are less inclined to support national interests. Finally, compared to majors in engineering and natural science at the postgraduate level, liberal arts studies are far less in demand. People are often hesitant to enrol in master's programs in philosophy or related fields of study. Because many employers and institutions typically favour applicants who are highly educated, particularly in practical academics as opposed to abstract ones. In conclusion, I believe that governments should prioritise funding for scientific research that increases national income. Rather than distributing funds fairly across the board.

Additionally, they support the wellbeing of both humans and animals as well as the survival of species. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic, which affected the world in the year 2020, had an effect on the country. Each nation, mainly Europe, had to contribute money to the scientist in order to provide a vaccine. This actually enables them to provide us a different kind of vaccination in 2021 that aids the community in battling the illness. Additionally, funding postgraduate scientists supports the field of medical and technological research for a better and simpler way of living in the future. This is the finest way for the government to advance the scientific community in order to combat current issues and enhance our quality of life. With the help of science, for instance, our ability to communicate has improved during the last ten years. Working remotely and staying in touch with one family throughout the day is possible for us to be connected at all times. As a result, communicating with one another and having a conversation is simpler. To sum up, the government ought to spend more money on scientists. Because their work improves the likelihood that future events won't have a bad impact on a person's life. Additionally, their contribution to technology has the potential to improve both our quality of life and the development of the country.