Mobile Phones And Driving Reading Answers

Dec 19, 2022

Mobile Phones And Driving Reading Answers is the topic discussing about the harmful effects of using mobile phones while driving. The given IELTS topic has been taken from the book called “Practice Tests for Ielts 2 Volume 2”. There are 16 total wide range of questions in the topic called Mobile Phones And Driving Reading Answers, which should be answered within the time span of 20 minutes by the candidates. The topic includes three questions types, which are, choose the correct heading, choose the correct option, and True/False/Not Given. The candidates should read thoroughly the IELTS reading passage in order to recognize the synonyms and identify the keywords and for answering the questions below. Similar kinds of topics like Mobile Phones And Driving Reading Answers are included in the IELTS reading practice papers, which the candidates can take into their consideration for performing a good score in this section.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1

Read the Passage to Answer the Following Questions

Mobile Phones And Driving Reading Answers

Though once perceived a luxury cell phones have become a common possession over the last ten years or so. Due to modern day technology and public demand cell phones have been made affordable to most. However, one of the most controversial topics of today is whether or not we should be using our cell phones whilst driving, Does it pose a danger to ourselves and other drivers? Or doesn’t it make any difference to the likelihood of an accident.
Several countries around the world have already imposed a national Jaw with heavy infringements. More recently the UK, Australia and Finland have joined the ranks of countries opposing this very hazardous act, with Ireland imposing the harshest penalties on the continent (a third offence can mean 3 months imprisonment). Also in Europe, the Netherlands is fining offenders 2000 Euros and 2 weeks in jail.
This dangerous distraction contributes largely to motor vehicle accidents and the statistics are Increasing daily as we continue to take our eyes off the road to call or even more dangerously text. Research by road safety groups suggests speaking on a phone whilst driving increases your chances of an accident, increasing to nine times more likely when texting. Time and again, in study after study replicated across the world, the use of a cell phone by the driver has been proven, beyond any sense of reasonable doubt, to dramatically increase the probability of a motor vehicle crash.
In New Zealand, a proposal made by a previous Labour led Government suggests a $50 fine and 27 demerit points for any person using a cell phone whilst driving, although the Ministry of Transport is still preparing a report based on public consultation. Although this is only a pending idea, the government knows this will be a difficult infringement to police but a start needs to be made and people need to understand the consequences of what potentially could happen. It is a common misconception that hands free kits are safe to use, but research conducted by Waikato University has proven that these can be equally as dangerous as hand held phones.
On one hand, using a cell phone whilst driving has become an integral part of our lives and is going to be a hard habit to kick. But it has been proven that our reaction time is never fast enough when confronted with a road hazard, but if you are having a conversation at the same time it will slow your reaction time by even more. Most people find It takes 2 and a half seconds to react in a dangerous situation but if you are on the phone you can add another 2 seconds onto that. Your attention is divided; part of you concentrates on your conversation, the other on driving. The demands of die conversation and the road are competing, therefore making it a cognitive distraction as well as physical as you are removing one hand from the steering wheel to hold the phone. On the other hand, an American radio host suggested that banning cell phones whist driving was taking it a step too far, “if we ban cell phones, what’s next? No billboards, coffee drinking, or CD players?” The host agreed that texting whilst driving was a danger but phoning was not.
Many people agreed with him in saying that texting was a definite hazard as the act of looking down would lead your eyes off the road. However, doesn’t holding a conversation while driving seems just as distracting as eating food or reaching for a CD? Accidents were happening decades before the cell phone was introduced so should we be taking this matter so seriously?
Obviously opinions will differ on this matter, and it will always remain a debatable issue. A long list of countries seems to be following the trend and imposing a law against cell phones on the road, but there is still and even longer list yet to follow. Lack of data leaves uncertain results but it seems research is ongoing and surveys and tests are being carried out on a regular basis to reach some kind of conclusion as to just how dangerous and potentially fatal this habit may be.

Section 2

Solution and Explanation
Questions 1 – 6

Reading Passage has seven paragraphs A – G.
Choose the correct heading for paragraphs B – G from the list of headings below.
Write the correct number i-x on your answer sheet.

List of Headings

Impact of mobile phones in hazards
Texting statistics
International reactions
Further research required
Evidence from around the globe
Challenges of enforcement
Global agreement on penalties
Contradictory data
Risks of talking to passengers
Balancing the risks

1) Paragraph B
2) Paragraph C
3) Paragraph D
4) Paragraph E
5) Paragraph F
6) Paragraph G

(Guide: Candidates need to match the paragraphs with the correct headings)

Answers:

Question 1:

Answer: III
Supporting Sentence: Several countries around the world have already imposed a national Jaw with heavy infringements.
Keyword: several countries, around the world
Keyword Location: Paragraph B
Explanation: The passage's author has described the various sanctions that have been adopted by various nations for those who are discovered using cell phones while driving in paragraph B. This may be considered a response on a global scale against cell phone use while driving.

Question 2:

Answer: V
Supporting Sentence: Time and again, in study after study replicated across the world, the use of a cell phone by the driver has been proven, beyond any sense of reasonable doubt, to dramatically increase the probability of a motor vehicle crash.
Keyword: across the world
Keyword location: Paragraph C
Explanation: The sentence "Time and again, in research after study duplicated across the world, the use of a mobile phone by the driver has been demonstrated, without any sense of reasonable doubt, to greatly raise the probability of a motor vehicle crash" (paragraph C) indicates that there are instances of people getting into accidents while using cell phones while driving.

Question 3:

Answer: VI
Supporting Sentence: the government knows this will be a difficult infringement to police
Keyword: infringement
Keyword location: Paragraph D
Explanation: The passage in paragraph D that reads, "Although this is simply a pending notion, the government realises this will be a tough violation to police but a start needs to be made and people need to understand the ramifications of what potentially could happen. It is a common misconception that hands-free kits are safe to use, but Waikato University research has shown that these can be just as dangerous as hand-held phones. These difficulties the government has had enforcing suggested laws to prevent people from using cell phones while driving indicate that these rules have not always been successful.

Question 4:

Answer: I
Supporting Sentence: Most people find It takes 2 and a half seconds to react in a dangerous situation but if you are on the phone you can add another 2 seconds onto that
Keyword: dangerous situation
Keyword location: Paragraph E
Explanation: The opening sentences of paragraph E: "On the one hand, using a cell phone while driving has permeated our daily lives and will be difficult to break. However, it has been demonstrated that when faced with a hazard on the road, our reaction times are never quick enough. If you are conversing with someone else at the same time, your reaction time will be considerably slower. The author, who is attempting to explain how mobile phones affect dangers, comes to the conclusion that "Your attention is divided; part of you concentrates on your chat, while the other is on driving."

Question 5:

Answer: X
Supporting Sentence: However, doesn’t holding a conversation while driving seems just as distracting as eating food or reaching for a CD? Accidents were happening decades before the cell phone was introduced so should we be taking this matter so seriously?
Keyword: distracting, accidents
Keyword location: Paragraph f
Explanation: The words "However, doesn't carrying on a conversation while driving seem just as distracting as eating food or grabbing for a CD? " appear in paragraph F. Should we be taking this subject so seriously when accidents occurred for decades before the invention of the cell phone? is a clear attempt to balance the risk of accidents caused by cell phone use while driving.

Question 6:

Answer: IV
Supporting Sentence: Lack of data leaves uncertain results but it seems research is ongoing and surveys and tests are being carried out on a regular basis to reach some kind of conclusion as to just how dangerous and potentially fatal this habit may be.
Keyword: data, research, surveys
Keyword location: Paragraph G
Explanation: The passage's sentences in paragraph G, "Lack of data leaves uncertain outcomes, but it seems study is ongoing and surveys and tests are being conducted on a regular basis to reach some kind of conclusion as to just how harmful and potentially lethal this habit may be," suggest that more research is needed before drawing a definite decision.

Questions 7 – 11:

Look at the following list of the statement (questions 7-11) based on ‘Mobile phones and driving’
Match the statement with the correct person or department A-E.

Ministry of Transport
Road safety groups
Waikato University
American radio host
The New Zealand government

7) is currently putting together feedback from the general public.
8) proposed specific penalties for mobile phone use while driving.
9) statistically proven the higher likelihood of an accident.
10)believes any use of a phone while driving has potential risks.
11)speaking on the phone is an overrated risk.

(Guide: Candidates need to answer questions by selecting the statements from A to E)

Answers:

Question 7:

Answer: A. Ministry of Transport
Supporting Sentence: “ Ministry of Transport is still preparing a report based on public consultation.”
Keyword: public consultation
Keyword location: Para D Lines 3-4
Explanation: The ministry of transportation is putting together a report based on public feedback, as shown by the above line in lines 3-4 of paragraph D.

Question 8:

Answer: E. The New Zealand government
Supporting Sentence: “In New Zealand, a proposal made by a previous Labour led Government suggests a $50 fine and 27 demerit points for any person using a cell phone whilst driving, ”
Keyword: NEw Zealand, government
Keyword location: Para D Lines 1-2
Explanation: Lines 1-2 of paragraph D suggests that for anyone found using a cell phone while driving, the New Zealand government has proposed a $50 punishment.

Question 9:

Answer: B. Road safety groups
Supporting Sentence: “Research by road safety groups suggests speaking on a phone whilst driving increases your chances of an accident, increasing to nine times more likely when texting.”
Keyword: Research by road safety groups suggests speaking on a phone whilst driving increases your chances of an accident
Keyword location: Paragraph C
Explanation: As per paragraph C in the passage, speaking on a cell phone while driving is likely to increase the likelihood of accidents, claims study by organisations dedicated to road safety.

Question 10:

Answer: C. Waikato University
Supporting Sentence: “It is a common misconception that hands free kits are safe to use, but research conducted by Waikato University has proven that these can be equally as dangerous as hand held phones.”
Keyword: Waikato University
Keyword location: Para D Lines 6-9
Explanation: Lines 6-9 of paragraph D implies that Waikato University has concluded from its research that even using hands-free devices while driving increases the probability of accidents, indicating that using a phone while driving carries some danger.

Question 11:

Answer: D. American radio host
Supporting Sentence: “On the other hand, an American radio host suggested that banning cell phones whilst driving was taking it a step too far, “if we ban cell phones, what’s next? No billboards, coffee drinking, or CD players?” The host agreed that texting whilst driving was a danger but phoning was not.”
Keyword: American radio host
Keyword location: Para E Lines 10-13
Explanation: Lines 10-13 of paragraph E describes that an American radio personality said that prohibiting cell phones while driving was going too far, asking, "If we ban cell phones, what's next? There are no billboards, coffee shops, or CD players? The host acknowledged that texting while driving posed a risk, but talking on the phone did not.

Questions 12 – 16:

Do the following statements agree with the information given in the reading passage?
Write your answers for questions 12-16 on your answer sheet.

TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts with the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this

12) The law in Ireland regarding mobile phone use while driving is the world’s most serious.
13) According to research conducted by road safety groups, speaking on a phone makes an accident nine times more likely.
14) Reaction times in an emergency are doubled if the driver is using a mobile.
15) Eating while driving is statistically as dangerous as using a mobile.
16) More research is required to form a clearer conclusion.

(Guide: Candidates need to answer the questions by identifying the questions as True or False or Not Given)

Answers:

Question 12:

Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation: No available information has been provided in the passage to support this sentence.

Question 13:

Answer: FALSE
Supporting Sentence: “Research by road safety groups suggests speaking on a phone whilst driving increases your chances of an accident, increasing to nine times more likely when texting. ”
Keyword: research, safety groups
Keyword location: Para C Lines 3-5
Explanation: The third to fifth lines of paragraph C enhances that speaking on the phone while driving raises the risk of an accident, and texting while driving boosts that risk to nine times higher, according to research by road safety organisations. Thus, the statement is a FALSE one.

Question 14:

Answer: FALSE
Supporting Sentence: Most people find it takes 2 and a half seconds to react in a dangerous situation but if you are on the phone you can add another 2 seconds onto that.
Keyword: reaction times
Keyword location: Para E Lines 2-5
Explanation: The second to fifth lines of paragraph E describes that it would only take an additional two seconds, not two and a half, to react in an emergency while the driver is on his phone.

Question 15:

Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation: No pertinent information to justify the validation of this statement has been provided in the passage.

Question 16:

Answer: TRUE
Supporting Sentence: Lack of data leaves uncertain results but it seems research is ongoing and surveys and tests are being carried out on a regular basis to reach some kind of conclusion as to just how dangerous and potentially fatal this habit may be.
Keyword: conclusion
Keyword location: Para G Lines 2-5
Explanation: Lines 2-5 of paragraph G states that there is a long list of nations that appear to be following the trend and enacting laws prohibiting cell phones while driving, but there are still many more that have yet to do so. There isn't enough information to draw firm conclusions, but it appears that studies, exams, and polls are regularly conducted to determine precisely how risky and possibly fatal this habit may be.