Marketing Practices IELTS Reading Answers

Aug 16, 2023

Marketing Practices IELTS Reading Answers is an academic reading topic which includes 13 questions. The specified Chocolate Making is Big Business IELTS Reading Answers topic generates 3 types of questions:0 true/ false/ not given, and identification of correct headings for paragraph types of questions. Candidates should read the IELTS Reading passage thoroughly in order to recognize synonyms, identify keywords, and answer the questions below. Candidates can further enhance their reading skills by going through IELTS reading practice papers available on the website. Candidates can use IELTS reading topics like Marketing Practices IELTS Reading Answers to enhance their performance in the reading section.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for FreeTrial Class Now

Section 1

Read the Passage to Answer the Following Questions

Marketing Practices IELTS Reading Answers

A. A few months ago Kim Schaefer, sales representative of a major global pharmaceutical company, walked into a medical center in New York to bring information and free samples of her company's latest products. That day she was lucky- a doctor was available to see her. 'The last rep offered me a trip to Florida. What do you have?' the physician asked. He was only half joking.

B. What was on offer that day was a pair of tickets for a New York musical. But on any given day what Schaefer can offer is typical for today's drugs rep -a car trunk full of promotional gifts and gadgets, a budget that could buy lunches and dinners for a small county hundreds of free drug samples and the freedom to give a physician $200 to prescribe her new product to the next six patients who fit the drug's profile. And she also has a few $ 1,000 honoraria to offer in exchange for doctors' attendance at her company's next educational lecture.

C. Selling Pharmaceuticals is a daily exercise in ethical judgment. Salespeople like Schaefer walk the line between the common practice of buying a prospect's time with a free meal, and bribing doctors to prescribe their drugs. They work in an industry highly criticized for its sales and marketing practices, but find themselves in the middle of the age-old chicken-or-egg question - businesses won't use strategies that don't work, so are doctors to blame for the escalating ravagance of pharmaceutical marketing? Or is the industry's responsibility to decide the boundaries?

D. The explosion in the sheer number of salespeople in the field- and the amount of funding used to promote their causes-forces close examination of the pressures, influences and relationships between drug reps and doctors. Salespeople provide much-needed information and education to physicians. In many cases the glossy brochures, article reprints and prescriptions they deliver are primary sources of drug education for healthcare givers.

With the huge investment the industry has placed in face-to-face selling, sales people have essentially become specialists in one drug or group of drugs - a tremendous advantage in getting the attention of busy doctors in need of quick information.

E. But the sales push rarely stops in the office. The flashy brochures and pamphlets left by the sales reps are often followed up with meals at expensive restaurants, meetings in warm and sunny places, and an inundation of promotional gadgets. Rarely do patients watch a doctor write with a pen that isn't emblazoned with a drug's name, or see a nurse use a tablet not bearing a pharmaceutical company's logo. Millions of dollars are spent by pharmaceutical companies on promotional products like coffee mugs, shirts, umbrellas, and golf balls.

Money well spent? It's hard to tell. I've been the recipient of golf balls from one company and I use them, but it doesn't make me prescribe their medicine, says one doctor.' I tend to think I'm not influenced by what they give me.'

F. Free samples of new and expensive drugs might be the single most effective way of getting doctors and patients to become loyal to a product. Salespeople hand out hundreds of dollars' worth of samples each week-$7.2 billion worth of them in one year. Though few

comprehensive studies have been conducted, one by the University of Washington investigated how drug sample availability affected what physicians prescribe. A total of 131 doctors self-reported their prescribing patterns-the conclusion was that the availability of samples led them to dispense and prescribe drugs that differed from their preferred drug choice.

G. The bottom line is that pharmaceutical companies as a whole invest more in marketing than they do in research and development. And patients are the ones who pay-in the form of skyrocketing prescription prices-for every pen that's handed out, every free theater ticket, and every steak dinner eaten. In the end the fact remains that pharmaceutical companies have every right to make a profit and will continue to find new ways to increase sales. But as the medical world continues to grapple with what's acceptable and what's not, it is clear that companies must continue to be heavily scrutinized for their sales and marketing strategies.

Section 2

Solution and Explanation

Questions 1-7
Reading Passage I has seven paragraphs, A-G. Choose the correct heading for each paragraph from the list of headings below.
Write the correct number, i-x, in boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet.

List of Headings

i. Not all doctors are persuaded
ii. Choosing the best offers
iii. Who is responsible for the increase in promotions?
iv. Fighting the drug companies
v. An example of what doctors expect from drug companies
vi. Gifts include financial incentives
vii. Research shows that promotion works
viii. The high costs of research
ix.The positive side of drug promotion
x. Who really pays for doctors' free gifts?

Question 1: Paragraph A

Answer: v
Supporting statement: “...Kim Schaefer, sales representative of a major global pharmaceutical company, walked into a medical center in New York to bring information and free samples of her company's latest products…”
Keywords: Kim Schaefer, sales, representative, global, pharmaceutical, company, medical centre, New York, information, free samples, latest, products
Keyword Location: para A, line 1
Explanation: According to the writer, Kim Schaefer, sales representative of a major global pharmaceutical company, walked into a medical center in New York to bring information and free samples of her company's latest products. That day she was lucky- a doctor was available to see her. 'The last rep offered me a trip to Florida. What do you have?' the physician asked.

Question 2: Paragraph B

Answer: vi
Supporting statement: “...she also has a few $ 1,000 honoraria to offer in exchange for doctors' attendance at her company's next educational lecture…”
Keywords: $ 1,000, honoraria, exchange, doctors, attendance, educational, lecture
Keyword Location: para B, line 3
Explanation: According to the writer, she also has a few $ 1,000 honoraria to offer in exchange for doctors' attendance at her company's next educational lecture.

Question 3: Paragraph C

Answer: iii
Supporting statement: “...Selling Pharmaceuticals is a daily exercise in ethical judgment…”
Keywords: Selling, Pharmaceuticals, exercise, ethical, judgment
Keyword Location: para C, line 1
Explanation: According to the writer, Selling Pharmaceuticals is a daily exercise in ethical judgment. Salespeople like Schaefer walk the line between the common practice of buying a prospect's time with a free meal, and bribing doctors to prescribe their drugs.

Question 4: Paragraph D

Answer: ix
Supporting statement: “...With the huge investment the industry has placed in face-to-face selling, sales people have essentially become specialists in one drug…”
Keywords: investment, industry, face-to-face, selling, sales people, specialists, one drug
Keyword Location: para D, line 4
Explanation: According to the writer, with the huge investment the industry has placed in face-to-face selling, sales people have essentially become specialists in one drug or group of drugs - a tremendous advantage in getting the attention of busy doctors in need of quick information.

Question 5: Paragraph E

Answer: i
Supporting statement: “...Rarely do patients watch a doctor write with a pen that isn't emblazoned with a drug's name, or see a nurse use a tablet not bearing a pharmaceutical company's logo…”
Keywords: patients, doctor, emblazoned, drug's name, nurse, tablet, pharmaceutical, company's, logo
Keyword Location: para E, line 3
Explanation: According to the writer, rarely do patients watch a doctor write with a pen that isn't emblazoned with a drug's name, or see a nurse use a tablet not bearing a pharmaceutical company's logo.

Question 6: Paragraph F

Answer: vii
Supporting statement: “...few comprehensive studies have been conducted, one by the University of Washington investigated how drug sample availability affected what physicians prescribe…”
Keywords: comprehensive, studies, University of Washington, drug sample, availability, physicians, prescribe
Keyword Location: para F, line 3
Explanation: According to the writer, few comprehensive studies have been conducted, one by the University of Washington investigated how drug sample availability affected what physicians prescribe. A total of 131 doctors self-reported their prescribing patterns-the conclusion was that the availability of samples led them to dispense and prescribe drugs that differed from their preferred drug choice.

Question 7: Paragraph G

Answer: x
Supporting statement: “...patients are the ones who pay-in the form of skyrocketing prescription prices-for every pen that's handed out, every free theater ticket, and every steak dinner eaten…”
Keywords: patients, skyrocketing, prescription, free theater ticket
Keyword Location: para G, line 1
Explanation: According to the writer, patients are the ones who pay-in the form of skyrocketing prescription prices-for every pen that's handed out, every free theater ticket, and every steak dinner eaten. In the end the fact remains that pharmaceutical companies have every right to make a profit and will continue to find new ways to increase sales.

Questions 8-13
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage 1? In boxes 8-13 on your answer sheet, write

YES - if the statement agrees with the views of the writer
NO - if the statement contradicts the views of the writer
NOT GIVEN - if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

Question 8: Sales representatives like Kim Schaefer work to a very limited budget.

Answer: no

Question 9: Kim Schaefer's marketing technique may be open to criticism on moral grounds.

Answer: yes
Supporting statement: “...Salespeople like Schaefer walk the line between the common practice of buying a prospect's time with a free meal, and bribing doctors to prescribe their drugs…”
Keywords: Salespeople, Schaefer, bribing, doctor, prescribe, drugs
Keyword Location: para C, line 2
Explanation: According to the writer, salespeople like Schaefer walk the line between the common practice of buying a prospect's time with a free meal, and bribing doctors to prescribe their drugs. They work in an industry highly criticized for its sales and marketing practices, but find themselves in the middle of the age-old chicken-or-egg question

Question 10: The information provided by drug companies is of little use to doctors.

Answer: no
Supporting statement: “...A total of 131 doctors self-reported their prescribing patterns-the conclusion was that the availability of samples led them to dispense…”
Keywords: 131 doctors, self-reported, patterns, prescribing, conclusion, availability, samples, dispense, drugs, prefered
Keyword Location: para F, line 4
Explanation: According to the writer, a total of 131 doctors self-reported their prescribing patterns-the conclusion was that the availability of samples led them to dispense and prescribe drugs that differed from their preferred drug choice.

Question 11: Evidence of drug promotion is clearly visible in the healthcare environment.

Answer: yes

Question 12: The drug companies may give free drug samples to patients without doctors' prescriptions.

Answer: not given
Explanation: No relevant information has been provided in the passage in order to support the said statement. Therefore, we can clearly conclude the statement as an invalid one.

Question 13: It is legitimate for drug companies to make money.

Answer: yes
Supporting statement: “...the fact remains that pharmaceutical companies have every right to make a profit and will continue to find new ways to increase sales…”
Keywords: pharmaceutical, companies, profit, increase, sales
Keyword Location: para G, line 3
Explanation: According to the writer, the fact remains that pharmaceutical companies have every right to make a profit and will continue to find new ways to increase sales. But as the medical world continues to grapple with what's acceptable and what's not, it is clear that companies must continue to be heavily scrutinized for their sales and marketing strategies.