Many Countries Have Compulsory Military Service for Men after they Leave School IELTS Writing Task 2

Undoubtedly, joining the army offers a lot of benefits; arguably, one of the most advantageous aspects is its ability to maintain and enhance physical and mental fitness. To further expound: young individuals - through rigorous training guided by experts - not only undergo an intense transformation but also cultivate resilience in both body and mind. This will assist them in maintaining their bodies: a state of optimal fitness.

Moreover, individuals can earn a respectable living–one of the most esteemed occupations globally–by serving their country; it is not merely an occupation but also a noble act. A survey conducted by The Times of India revealed: 70% of students have undertaken the National Defense Agency (NDA) test –a testament to their seriousness toward enlisting in the army.

Undeniably, most countries today require special forces: robust squads dedicated to protecting both their citizens and territorial integrity from peril. A strong military force necessitates; moreover — troopers prepared to engage vigorously in battle. Teachers, therefore, ought to encourage their students to join the special forces; this will better protect our country from terrorist threats. Research evidences that among the world's most formidable active armies are those of USA and Russia: hence, there exists minimal likelihood of a terrorist attack—this is largely due to their robust detection systems.

Ultimately, every individual -- regardless of gender -- should be mandated to serve in the military post-schooling; both men and women alike. The enhanced safety measures and health benefits that result from this requirement are not just personal boons: they contribute significantly to the betterment of our nation as a whole.

Primarily, several motivations propel governments to desire youthful males for military service: their impressive physical strength and endurance—qualities frequently coveted in recruits—and the potential benefits derived from enlisting individuals with advanced education. Particularly in managing intelligent firing systems, young computer experts could fulfill a critical role; these technical positions call for expertise that this demographic can provide. Considering a significant portion of the population comprises young students, it becomes understandable: governments opt to enlist these individuals in the army – an attempt to capitalize on this valuable human resource.

However, the recommendation to implement this system on an international scale seems imprudent: it seemingly contradicts some students' desires and could potentially impede their educational growth. Essentially, we must recognize that not all students are prepared to forfeit personal objectives for military service; compelling such individuals may well be perceived as a human rights infraction. In certain developed countries such as the United States of America—where people place high importance on their freedom of choice—this system will not prove effective; furthermore, numerous individuals possess a robust desire to persist with their higher education without interruptions. Forcing them into army enlistment would unlikely elicit optimal performance. Despite boasting a sufficient number of players, significant improvement still eluded the defensive line.

I hold the view that compulsory military service may indeed reap advantages in specific regions; however, I firmly assert that its implementation should not be a mandate for every country.

Military service, I understand, can imbue individuals with distinct advantages: it teaches strength and survival skills applicable to perilous situations; hones precision and discipline; fosters improved physical stamina and health. Consider the soldiers— their priorities often underscore accuracy, cleanliness, even a meticulous focus on well-groomed presentation—all testament to the military's impact. Contrastingly, many individuals within our society might not assign as much importance to these aspects.

I assert emphatically: these positive outcomes are not exclusive to military participation; indeed, anyone can cultivate such favorable habits independently. Furthering this contention--it seems imprudent to mandate young individuals' service in the armed forces, particularly for nations that aren't engaged in war or stationed within perilous regions akin to the Middle East. Moreover, this could precipitate societal complications: not merely because the government desires their children's military service; but also due to escalating public expenditures. Maintaining an army -- a task replete with challenges -- necessitates considerable financial resources. Taxpayers may dispute the value of channeling state funds towards these expenses; they could deem it unnecessary – akin to boasting a larger arm. They might prefer their money not be spent on perceived trivialities: most, in fact, could simply view this as financial waste.

In conclusion: I concur that mandatory military service should be a requirement for certain countries; however, this stipulation ought to primarily apply—to ensure optimal preparedness and defense—specifically to nations facing potential war threats.