It is Impossible to Help All People in the World IELTS Writing Task 2

It is impossible to help all people in the world IELTS Writing Task 2 consists of three sample answers provided below. The task requires the candidates to provide a tentative and argumentative answer to the question. The sample answers comprise two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description of the topic. The body contains argumentative statements and tentative answers to support the test-taker's perspective.
IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. The areas that candidates are assessed on are grammar, vocabulary, and style. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Model Answer 1:

Many people believe that governments should only support their own inhabitants and not assist residents from other countries. While it is true that the government must prioritise its own citizens, I believe it is also possible to provide assistance to others around the world.

To begin, there are several reasons why governments should assist citizens in their own countries. To begin, because there are an increasing number of homeless persons in local communities, such as people who do not have their own homes and live under bridges or metro stations, authorities should prioritise assisting impoverished people who cannot afford shelters. The government, for example, may provide public housing and free meals. Second, as a result of the transitional economy, the unemployment rate has skyrocketed.

For example, in Vietnam, the labor-intensive economy has evolved into a knowledge-based economy requiring a large number of educated workers. As a result, policymakers must prioritise the issue of unemployment. Governments, for example, might provide employment training to unemployed people. This may help to minimise the number of unemployed persons.

However, I believe that we can also assist civilians from other regions of the world. First, because there are many undeveloped countries with low living standards, such as Haiti and Ethiopia, governments in wealthier countries must assist these poorer countries. This could assist them in overcoming adversity. For example, when individuals in African countries die of curable diseases, wealthy countries might give drugs and provide medical assistance. Furthermore, diplomacy is critical to economic development. Japan, for example, typically provides untied loans to several developing countries. This could strengthen diplomatic relations between states and ensure countries' long-term development. In conclusion, while governments can aid their population, I believe it is equally feasible to help individuals all around the world.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Articles

Check: IELTS Actual Test ebooks Combo

Model Answer 2:

Countries are classified into three types: developed, developing, and underdeveloped. So the governments in the countries I listed provide a different type of welfare benefit to their citizens. I feel that such affluent countries have the ability to assist countries that are experiencing challenges, but they cannot assist all people on the planet. As a result, I agree that governments should prioritise residents in their own countries before attempting to assist other countries, as described in the following paragraph of this article.

Nowadays, technology has advanced to the point that many things are faster and easier than they were in the past. As a result, the effect of this development has been felt by all countries throughout the world, and it is the responsibility of governments to increase domestic money circulation. Because in today's world, people can utilise their money anywhere and at any time. For example, we can buy an ebook from an online store or conduct numerous financial activities without having to go to the bank.

On the other side, in the present, countries that lack authority, whether developed or emerging, are unable to reap the greatest benefits from technology. As a result, some countries face challenges that their governments are unable to address. People, for example, did not receive assistance when a natural disaster struck, and governments did not provide compulsory education for their inhabitants. As a result, some developing countries must seek assistance from other countries.

To summarise, I agree that the government should prioritise its people, but if their people have a decent quality of life, they can come to aid other countries in need. So, while we can assist others by collaborating with other governments or countries, it is impossible to assist everyone on the planet.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers

Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Model Answer 3:

The subject of nations attempting to provide overseas aid has recently captured the public's attention. Many people say that it is difficult to support all of the world's citizens, and that countries should prioritise domestic happiness over foreign aid to other societies. Although I agree that it is hard to assist all of the world's residents, I believe that governments should focus primarily on local concerns. In this essay, I shall elaborate on my point of view.

On the one hand, the world's governments' reluctance to provide international help to underdeveloped regions is understandable. It is unrealistic to expect government assistance to reach all of the impoverished because their numbers are large and they exist in different parts of the world. Furthermore, communities have a wide range of demands, which can create a slew of problems when it comes to assisting them. Due to poor transportation and extreme weather conditions, developed communities, for example, may face several challenges while sending food and medical aid to destitute regions in Africa. Because of such concerns, governments spend money to help other countries while struggling to care for their own citizens due to local budgetary constraints. In other words, leaders should prioritise the well-being of their citizens before spending large sums of money on global assistance, which could have a significant impact on their economy.

Officials, on the other hand, should assist as many societies as possible, regardless of the notion of assisting all people on the earth. Rich countries should help poor countries in critical humanitarian sectors such as health, nutrition, and education. Nations such as Yemen, which face the domestic threat of famine or contagions caused by war and terrorism, should get assistance from wealthy communities. This humanitarian cause of help will have a significant psychological impact on residents of both rich and impoverished areas. This is evident as they discourage any sense of alienation, fragmentation, or loss in favour of the enjoyment of charity and belonging to the global public. As a result, assisting people overseas not only assists the poor in living properly, but it also promotes the idea of self-devotion and belonging to achieve a better world among wealthy audiences.

Finally, I believe that world leaders should provide a helping hand to their struggling neighbours in order to support those in need. In addition to achieving political rivalry among nations, governments should provide their citizens' domestic needs and assist others in promoting good humanitarian ties.