Interviews Form the Basic Selection Criteria for Most Large Companies IELTS Writing Task 2

Interviews Form The Basic Selection Criteria For Most Large Companies IELTS Writing Task 2 consists of three sample answers provided below. It focuses on the selection criteria based on the interview. Candidates are required to address their viewpoint and support it through effective arguments. The sample answers comprises two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description about the topic. The body contains argumentative statements and tentative answers to support the test-taker's perspective.
IELTS writing task 2 provides candidates an opportunity to express their knowledge and views based on the knowledge and views. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that an interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Model Answer 1

Many people are of the opinion that interviews are the best for selection. While others are of the opinion that interviews are not the best method for assessment of skills. Most companies schedule interviews to assess the employee that they will be hiring. Recruiting new employees is of course a long and tedious process. I believe that it is the right way to assess the candidates and to understand them better. Some people are however of the opposing views. Different companies have different policies. Some believe that interviews might not be a reliable method to access the candidates. Some companies also hold a written test, followed by group discussions and then a technical interview. Group discussions also serve the best purpose. Interviews enable one to get the perspective of the candidate on different things. Also confidence and other skills are seen. Nowadays, emotional intelligence is given much importance. The emotional intelligence can be seen through interviews. Also, it offers one to have a face to face conversation. Usually, companies assess the candidates on their subject knowledge, communication and interpersonal skills by conducting several rounds. Companies that hire new employees undoubtedly want the best of the candidates, which is why a thorough critiquing of the person is required. I honestly believe that interviews are a reliable method as compared to written tests or group discussions. While interviewing the interviewer can test his knowledge, and communication skills simultaneously. A few companies interview two to three candidates at the same time instead of a one-on-one interview. Interviews can tell alot about the candidate and they can make an informed decision on the spot. It also removes the unnecessary hassles of conducting written tests which adds up the hiring process. The interviewer can also assess the candidate’s conduct via interviews, thus, they are the most efficient and reliable methods to hire candidates.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Articles

Check: IELTS Actual Test ebooks Combo

Model Answer 2

Hiring and assessing new hires is undoubtedly a tedious task. I believe companies that have a long hiring process are nothing but a waste of time. A candidate’s knowledge, conduct, communication and other skills can easily be assessed via an interview, instead of assessing them via 2-3 rounds. Long hiring process adds to the complexity of the hiring process and also puts the candidates under a lot of pressure. Considering that the success of a company is majorly dependent on the skills and efforts of the employees. Being interviewed is an essential factor in getting hired for a job in a renowned organization.
During a comprehensive interview, an employer gains a first hand impression of their future employee. Interviews help the interviewer to assess the candidates on a personal level. Their communication skills and conduct are also critiqued via the same. Moreover, I believe a candidate’s subject knowledge can be analyzed in a better way via interviews. It also helps interviewees to understand how a candidate might behave under pressure. Interviews also help interviews to factually the information that the candidates have mentioned in their interviews. Thus, it helps them make an informed and quick decision. In this way, employers can avoid hiring the wrong candidate. Every job requires a candidate to possess certain skills. For example government jobs require candidates to have more theoretical knowledge of the subject which is assessed by written tests. The interview that follows is either a formality on the company’s behalf or to analyze a candidate’s communication skills. It doesn’t have relevance if it is a field job that requires the candidates to have advanced knowledge on the subject. Unless it is a job that requires both experience and skills, for instance, an interview will suffice. Thus, I prefer interviews as the most cost-effective, and efficient method of hiring.

Model Answer 3

According to some people, interviews are best for selection. While many do not consider interviews as an effective medium for selection. People are divided on whether companies must interview candidates while hiring the new employees. Some people agree to this fact while others disagree. I myself believe that interviews are the most reliable form to understand a candidate. Every company has certain requirements, and skills that they are looking for in candidate’s . For example a marketing company would require candidates to have exemplary interpersonal, communication and leadership skills. A field job would require candidates to have more theoretical knowledge or experience in the field. I believe while hiring in a marketing company interviews as the entire job role is based on the candidates communicating with the clients. A field engineer or a technician requires knowledge of the equipment thus, they can be assessed via a written test. In such cases interviews alone might not help in critiquing the candidates. Interviews offer face to face conversations. It also gives the exact information about the candidate. Also, one can check their abilities and skills. Confidence is an important factor which is determined by interviews. Also, according to psychologists, interviews increase one’s communication skills. The candidate tries their best to impress the employers. The emotional intelligence as well as IQ can be determined by interviews. Thus, there are major roles that require a candidate to pass the written as well as interview rounds. While there are others that need to be scrutinized to such an extent. The hiring process should be decided based on the respective job description. Companies shouldn’t standardize a fixed hiring process instead cut-short the hiring process to hire the best candidate. For me, interviews are the best form of hiring candidates. It gives the interviewer a thorough understanding of the candidates.