Intelligent Students Should Be Grouped Together And Taught Separately IELTS Writing Task 2

Although some people think that separating students is a good idea. Others think that this approach not only spreads hopelessness among normal students. But it also refers to the importance of nurture in education. A stimulating learning environment at school is what makes a student successful, and it is made possible by the instruction of both gifted and average kids.

Despite the fact that young students can benefit much from interacting with peers their own age. It is generally accepted that this type of interaction is not necessary for a positive educational experience. The case for intellectual segregation has several significant benefits. First off, high achievers have the chance to succeed in a way that they couldn't in a regular class. Because students are placed in classes according to their cognitive levels. Students can succeed with intellectual freedom since they can be placed in an unconstrained educational environment.

Second, there is a compelling case for preventing children from excelling intellectually above their classmates even when their mental capacity allows it. Why should we restrict the brainpower of our next generation? For instance, many of the very successful artists. And business people of today came from unconstrained educational backgrounds. And were given the freedom to fully explore their minds and careers.

A more liberal environment that improves the learning capacities of intellectually talented youngsters will. In my opinion, help both individual careers and future society as a whole. Even if I feel that an educational setting for young learners should encourage equitable opportunity.

Why should intellectual learners receive different instruction is the first point of discussion. The initial goal is to incite healthy rivalry among intelligent students, just enough to push them above their comfort zones and maximize their potential. Additionally, if all of the pupils are of the same caliber, it will be simpler for the teacher to deliver the lesson with complete focus. For instance, there are many formulae and theorems in the study of mathematics. Undoubtedly, a quick learner recalls the formulas and can solve the problems with ease. While weak children require further instruction to comprehend the equation. As a result, those with quick minds begin to feel that their productive time is being squandered. Because they answered the issue in a matter of seconds while those with lower intelligence are still working on it. As a result, it makes them feel inferior to one another.

Each student has the right to learn without facing prejudice. And when they are treated equally, their knowledge and learning capacity are enhanced. There are those who are extraordinarily brilliant in academics, yet everyone has a distinct level of knowledge. Some students, however, excel in academic activity. such as athletics, dance, music, and social skills. For instance, bookworms who only engage in academic activity can become socially isolated.

To sum it all, both teaching approaches have advantages and disadvantages. However, in my opinion, teaching everyone equally would be a superior strategy. Because it improves the child's general wellbeing. They will eventually become more competitive. Additionally, the pupils' morale was damaged, which made them behave horribly instead of wisely.

Why some individuals argue that brilliant students should be taught separately is understandable. They can advance more quickly because they pick up concepts more quickly. They can even study a lot more than what is taught in the regular curriculum thanks to this. For instance, brilliant pupils in some schools might begin receiving medical and admission counseling as early as the seventh or eighth grade. This gives them a competitive advantage over their counterparts in today's environment of intense competition.

However, I don't believe that this strategy of dividing students will actually provide any significant advantages. First off, when clever kids are taught alongside mediocre students, their performance is unaffected. Although the teacher may take longer to complete the lectures when the class contains inferior kids.The typical curriculum is set up to account for these delays. On the other hand, dividing kids may cause typical students' grades to drop even worse. They become unmotivated to work harder when all the other pupils in the class are average. Additionally, teaching poor or average pupils individually will make them feel inferior and have an impact on their performance. Nobody wants to be regarded as average or less intelligent, after all.

The kids' potential to be labeled and associated with stigma is one evident problem. This is due to the possibility that they might be injured and let their morals slip. Over time, they lose focus and do poorly on tests.

In conclusion, classifying kids according to their academic aptitude is not particularly advantageous. Although it is unlikely that this practice will boost the performance of top performers. It will undoubtedly have an impact on the grades of average students.