Methods of Waste Disposal IELTS Writing Task 1
Methods of Waste Disposal IELTS Writing Task 1 is an Academic Writing Task 1 topic. The main focus of Methods of Waste Disposal IELTS Writing Task 1 is testing the candidate’s response to infographics like bars, graphs, diagrams, tables, and more. The candidates are required to present a tentative answer for the same. IELTS writing task 1 requires candidates to write a summary or overview based on a diagram, a table, a line graph, or a bar graph in at least 150 words. IELTS academic writing task 1 is a writing task for 150 words. Candidates are given 20 minutes and are required to write a summary for IELTS Academic writing task 1. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Meanwhile, candidates might consider practicing from IELTS writing practice papers to help excel your writing skills.
Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now
Topic: The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.
Band 8 Answer
With the growth in urbanization and technology paving new roads every day, the type and the quantity of waste generated have also undergone a tremendous change. Thus, waste disposal has become a very important responsibility for all countries. Different countries use different methods for the disposal of their waste materials. The choice of methods depends upon various factors like- the amount of waste generated, economic condition, technological development, resources available, and others. However, of all the methods used in waste disposal the most popular are- Landfill, Incineration, recycling, and composting.
In most countries, incineration and landfill are more popular than the other two alternatives. In Toronto, the process of landfilling is used to dispose of more than 70% of the total garbage, and more than 10% by the method of Incineration. The remaining minimal amount of garbage is only recycled or used in composting, where recycling takes a little lead over the composting. Kuala Lumpur presents an almost opposite number in the case of landfilling and incineration. Here incineration takes up more than 50% of the waste, whereas landfilling takes up only a little over 10%. Though recycling here is a more popular choice than landfilling, taking more than 20% of the total waste generated, composting is still the least favorite with lesser than even 10%.
In Madrid, the figures are not so contrasting, though recycling and composting are not the priorities here too with about meager 20 percent and 10 percent. At the same time, landfilling and incineration are the choices for about 30% and 40% of the total garbage disposed of. In Amman, the figures for landfilling and incineration go hand in hand whereas the figures for recycling and composting are pretty close. The method of landfilling is used to dispose of more than 40% percent of the garbage and incineration for about another 40%. In the remaining amount, the process of recycling takes very little over 10 percent leaving composting reduced with lesser than even 5%.
Band 7 Answer
The increase in industrialisation has led to increased garbage dumps. The above-mentioned bar graph presents a comparison between 4 different cities that have their own set of methods and approach in order to ensure waste disposal. These cities as mentioned in the graph can be highlighted as; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. The data represents the percentages of the four most common approaches to waste disposal, i.e Landfill and Incineration, recycling and composting as portrayed in the above graphs.
It can be concluded from the graph that Toronto attempts to dump garbage by the means of landfills at an approximate weightage of 70%. However, Amman on the other hand adapts the process of landfills to dispose of 50% of its garbage dumps. In addition, the statistics of the usage of landfilling as a process to dump garbage falls drastically in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur. The statistics for Madrid attempting landfill as a waste disposal has fallen down to the percentage of 29%. Moreover, the statistics for Kuala Lumpur associated with the process of landfills is the lowest being 18%.
Incineration on the other hand, is a popular method and is highly attempted by Kuala Lumpur. Kuala Lumpur appoints this process of waste disposal at large and disposes of more than 50% of its waste. However, Amman and Madrid on the other hand deploy this method in order to dispose of waste with constant statistics of 38% and 40%. Recycling of wastage on the other hand is attempted to be implemented as a process at the rate of 23% in Kuala Lumpur and Madrid. Recycling, however, is adapted to dispose only 10% of the wastes in Toronto and Amman. The least used method of waste disposal is Compositing and this method is used to dispose of about 2-8% of total wastage in these four cities.
Band 6.5 Answer
With the onset of industrialisation 4.0 and increased processes of urbanisation have led to increasing in the accumulation of waste. The bar graph portrayed above showcases a potential comparison between 4 different cities and there approach to management and disposal of waste. These statistics highlight the comparison between Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. These processes of waste disposal that have been portrayed in the graph are; Landfill and Incineration, recycling and composting.
The graph indicates that Toronto makes an effort to dispose of trash in landfills, with a weighting of about 70%. On the other side, Amman modifies the landfill disposal technique to get rid of 50% of its rubbish dumps. Additionally, figures show a sharp decline in the use of landfilling as a method of rubbish disposal in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur. The data for Madrid's attempts to dispose of rubbish in landfills have decreased to a rate of 29%. Additionally, Kuala Lumpur has the lowest statistics (18%) for the process of landfills.
Incineration on the opposite side, is highly attempted by Kuala Lumpur. This is used to dispose off more than 50% of the waste that is produced in Kuala Lumpur. Incineration stands at low and is attempted least in Amman and Madrid. Recycling is attempted to dispose off 10% of the wastes in Toronoto and Amman. Composting holds the position of least use method for garbage disposal.
Check- IELTS Writing Samples
- Average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients IELTS writing task 1
- Southland’s Main Exports in 2000 and Future Projections For 2025 IELTS Writing Task 1
- Different Sources of Air Pollutants IELTS Writing Task 1
- Different Types of Crime in England and Wales From 1970 to 2005 IELTS Writing Task 1
- The Graph below shows the Total Births and the Total Deaths in a European Country from 1950 to 2050 IELTS Writing Task 1
- Line Graph Showing Percentage of Car Ownership in Great Britain IELTS Writing Task 1
- Number of Books Read by Men and Women at Burnaby Public Library IELTS Writing Task 1
- Journeys made by Different Forms of Transport in Four Countries IELTS Writing Task 1
- Population Aged 65 and Over of Three Countries IELTS Writing Task 1
- Plan A & B shows a Health Centre in 2005 and in Present Day IELTS Writing Task 1
- Automatic Photo Booth IELTS Writing Task 1
- Life Cycle of the Salmon IELTS Writing Task 1
- Water Usage in Australia IELTS Academic Writing Task 1
- Production of Potato Chips IELTS Writing Task 1
- A Table Showing Social and Economic Indicators for Four countries in 1994 IELTS Writing Task 1
- Noise Pollution IELTS Writing Task 1
- Internet Use in Six Categories by Age Group IELTS Writing Task 1
- Number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham IELTS writing task 1
- Percentage of Students Giving Good Ratings IELTS Writing Task 1
Comments